No to what? You don't point to which part you don't agree with.
I would be careful of posting one sentence posts. Mods normally don't like it....
yes mom /jk lol
i guess you need to look up about a quarter of an inch from my reply to see the OP's question.
I was just not sure which one you didn't agree. I will say... I'm sure your not my son . And double sure I cannot be a mom.
But in future please quote what you don't agree it makes it much easier. I was up like 5 from your post, so I just wanted to make sure you did not mean me.
Ahh a bit paranoid.
But his answer of no while 1 word would be legit if it was his first post to the thread. not so sure. as I am a bit lazy to go back and look. give me a minute. Was his first Post to the thread so 'no' would be a legit answer.
I have thought about this quite a bit and I think no might be correct.
Yeah a do see a need for BTC. But I am not sure demand will be high enough.
3 big asic build self mining companies with 60% of the network have 0 incentive to grow hashrate. They merely need lower power costs every 9 months to 18 months time and maintain the same hash rate. I think this forces price downwards. little by little.
Unless a few speculators do a pump and pump and pump scheme. Since all the coins in the world 14 mill = 3.3 bill usd.
Bill Gates Warren Buffet and an arab shiek or two could easily drive prices higher and higher and higher.. This factor does not vanish until BTC is worth 600bill or so.
which is 4300 a coin not sure if this happens. but you never know.
which mean, btc can rises to what ever price which its backer think reasonable.
i dont know why you think 4300 is a limit ?
i thought that limit is 50000 per btc