Topic: Is Charlie Lee just lazy? - page 3. (Read 3013 times)
He is lazy? Maybe, he got plenty of money because he is the creator of LTC. He has earned a lot in Bay Area. LTC has no future because of poor development.
It works.. what more do you want ? (i have said for years)
Change for the sake of change for the sake of profits ?
Change for the sake of change for the sake of profits ?
Charlie Lee is not lazy, his Litecoin was created by a joke, you know he just modified a little code, like total supply, block time. He has proven his competency to be a reliable altcoin dev, but he is not an innovative dev like Vitalik Buterin, he is not a top developer. He is just a lucky guy who works in Coinbase, otherwise Coinbase would never list Litecoin.
Look at eth dash and really every other alt and what they have to offer compared to LTC. LTC is the new doge. Why do you act so clueless as to what I am talking about? LTC is 6 year old tech. The point of alts is to improve upon the tech of btc and to compete. The dev has a duty to the coin holders to stay competitive.
LTC is a lack of the innovation. The competition on alt is really strict right now. Charlie lee is a lazy person, and I don't think if he will be adding SegWit on the litecoin if it hasn't caused by his brother Bobby lee(BTCC is SegWit supporter).https://bit.news/eng/bobby-lee-chief-btcc-bitcoin-pool-urges-community-act-responsibly/
Just waiting for the SegWit activation it same means waiting for the ltc like dogecoin.
Look at eth dash and really every other alt and what they have to offer compared to LTC. LTC is the new doge. Why do you act so clueless as to what I am talking about? LTC is 6 year old tech. The point of alts is to improve upon the tech of btc and to compete. The dev has a duty to the coin holders to stay competitive.
What kind of development would you like to see?
Why has the development been so lazy? They had the golden goose at one time. One of the fairest launches in crytpto and the number 2 spot to bitcoin. Just to see it all slip away as the competition continued to innovate. There has been nothing done to improve the coin and as it slips and slips down the charts you hear nothing other then Segwit implementation that nobody wants apparently. Its a shame. Eth had the fork problem which presented the perfect opportunity for Litecoin to return to the top. Dash was smart and did what should be done. But with the premine in the beginning.......
I don't know what do you expect what else should be done when you have perfectly working coin? Litecoin is a good place to test Segwit and not Charlie Lee decides accept it or not. However, I can understand your complains regarding the price. I'm not sure if any development could help here. But in my opinion - Bitcoin is for "store of value" and Litecoin for "everyday transactions". Win win situation.
Why has the development been so lazy? They had the golden goose at one time. One of the fairest launches in crytpto and the number 2 spot to bitcoin. Just to see it all slip away as the competition continued to innovate. There has been nothing done to improve the coin and as it slips and slips down the charts you hear nothing other then Segwit implementation that nobody wants apparently. Its a shame. Eth had the fork problem which presented the perfect opportunity for Litecoin to return to the top. Dash was smart and did what should be done. But with the premine in the beginning.......
Jump to: