When I see how hot is now, and every year is worse, with lots of weather disasters, I really think that our climate changing very quickly.
It is a long time for politicians to agree on this issue, and to do something.
Topic: Is global warming a scam? (Read 13396 times)
Global warming is TRUE! I can see and feel it. Extreme kind of heat and cold are being experienced by people around the world. 10 years ago, climate was different, and now? It is getting worse every year!
No, it's really true, the Internet is full of evidence.
^^^ Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Global warming is the reason why the northern USA and Canada had one of the harshest, coldest winters on record last winter, right?
Wake up! You GW enthusiasts don't know what you are talking about. If GW IS real, there isn't really any way to tell it for sure.
Wake up! You GW enthusiasts don't know what you are talking about. If GW IS real, there isn't really any way to tell it for sure.
global warming is not a scam. there is scientific evidence that shows its effects on not only the land and the air but also people. foolish for people to think it's a scam
i dont think so, some other places in our planet is scorching hot
You know that's funny, nobody really say global warming or cooling, they say climate change. And you know that - climate change is real, but it's happening every few hundred years, so this is ok
GW... complete scam.
Everyone should look into the grand solar minimum and solar cycles.
Its not a scam. Its really a very serious issue and people should be aware about this. Temperature of earth increasing day by day and Himalaya's glacier melt very fast. In the next 5-7 years temperature increase 2 degree and oceans water level increase approx 5 feet. Lower part will be affected by flood. Its not a joke. Plant tree as much as we can. Otherwise condition will go from bad to worst.
It's very much a scam. We can actually do something about it too but global warming scammers won't talk about nuclear power
how can it be scam ^^ ?
did the earth promise you anything and delivered something different .. so it can be a scam ?
did the earth promise you anything and delivered something different .. so it can be a scam ?
The more fear the general public has, the more control the world's elite has over them.
Do you think that the global warming/climate change controversy is one of these instances?
I think it is arrogant to think we can affect climate change. The earth goes through various cycles which alter conditions. We do have some affect on what happens, but I the extent of our contribution is likely very limited.
I'm not saying something it's something that we shouldn't worry about. We have to come up with alternate living solutions to minimize deaths and other catastrophes, but I don't think it's all our fault.
Thoughts?
Do you think that the global warming/climate change controversy is one of these instances?
I think it is arrogant to think we can affect climate change. The earth goes through various cycles which alter conditions. We do have some affect on what happens, but I the extent of our contribution is likely very limited.
I'm not saying something it's something that we shouldn't worry about. We have to come up with alternate living solutions to minimize deaths and other catastrophes, but I don't think it's all our fault.
Thoughts?
What do you mean its not all our fault, even it its not you the occurrence of global is still man-made which is our own species. Their fault, our fault.
4 Letters : NOPE
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
Global warming of any significance, or that humanity can or should do anything about, is a complete and absolute scam. Remember the harsh winter the American Midwest had this last winter and spring? Now look.
90-degree heat stifles Anchorage for first time in its history as sweltering heat wave grips Alaska
The previous record of 85 degrees Fahrenheit was set in 1969. It also shattered the daily record of 77 degrees for the Fouth of July, which had stood since 1999. Records in Anchorage date back to 1952.
Several other places in Alaska set all-time or daily records on Thursday.
While it was well above normal in Anchorage, the 90-degree temperature is not a first for the state of Alaska.
According to records kept by the National Weather Service (NWS), Alaska is no stranger to the 90s. In fact, way back on July 28, 1919, Fairbanks made a run at 100 when the mercury topped out at 99. Fairbanks has experienced 90-degree heat on several other occasions, most recently on Aug. 5, 1994, when it recorded a 93-degree temperature.
Several other places in Alaska set all-time or daily records on Thursday.
While it was well above normal in Anchorage, the 90-degree temperature is not a first for the state of Alaska.
According to records kept by the National Weather Service (NWS), Alaska is no stranger to the 90s. In fact, way back on July 28, 1919, Fairbanks made a run at 100 when the mercury topped out at 99. Fairbanks has experienced 90-degree heat on several other occasions, most recently on Aug. 5, 1994, when it recorded a 93-degree temperature.
Check the links in the article. And consider that with all the chemtrail spraying being done to fight global warming, you can expect nature to push back like in the article, above. I just hope we haven't messed with nature so badly, that in the resulting push-back she destroys us all with heat way beyond our A/C control. Of course, the one-worlders want to reduce the population, anyway.
4 Letters : NOPE
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
It definitely is not a scam, it was a plan to melt the arctic ice for more oil etc. but the whole idea backfired..
Humans are dying, climate change is real and this will destroy human life.
damage to nature occurs in almost all parts of the earth, due to human greed.
God will punish us all !!!!
damage to nature occurs in almost all parts of the earth, due to human greed.
God will punish us all !!!!
Our nature is so fragile that the slightest change can cause a tsunami of change
What do see where you live or go ?? What is the climate and temperature where you live and travel ?? Those MBAs and CAs are scammers.
Well said, friend.
Yes, global warming is a scam. Not because it isn't happening (barely), but because of the way it is presented.
25 Simple Bullet Points Proving CO2 Does Not Cause Global Warming
Check article for the rest of the 25, and for the links that back it all up.
25 Simple Bullet Points Proving CO2 Does Not Cause Global Warming
‘Bullet points’ proving CO2’s innocence.
Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022. Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective.
– Geologist Dr. Roger Higgs
___________________
25 simple bullet points proving CO2 does not cause global warming: by a geologist for a change
Dr Roger Higgs,
Geoclastica Ltd, Technical Note 2019-11,
6th April 2019, on ResearchGate
Not by Fire but by Ice... Robert W. Felix Best Price: $12.95 Buy New $89.71 (as of 09:15 EDT - Details)
We urgently need to expose the ‘CO2 = pollutant’ fallacy being forced upon your children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces by schools, universities, governments and mainstream media worldwide, and to denounce it in scrupulously truthful terms easily understood by the public, including those youngsters themselves.
Here are the 25 bullet points proving CO2’s innocence:
1) Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022 (see my Technical Note 2019-10). Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective.
2) IPCC’s very existence relies on public belief in manmade or ‘anthropogenic’ global warming (AGW) by CO2 emissions. Moreover its appointed authors, mostly government and university researchers, are nearly all biased by strong vested interests in AGW, i.e. reputations (publications, lectures) & continuance of salaries & research grants. Similarly, major universities have abandoned their scientific impartiality & integrity by hosting research institutes mandated to confirm & act on AGW, e.g. Grantham Institute (Imperial College), Tyndall Centre.
3) The often-repeated ‘97% consensus among scientists that global warming is man’s fault’ (CO2 emissions) is untrue. It refers in fact to surveys of just a relatively small group of ‘climate scientists’ (a fairly new type of scientist, with strong incentives for bias; see Bullets 2 & 15), moreover only those who are ‘actively publishing’.
4) ‘Climate change denier’ & ‘global warming denier’ are despicable & dishonest terms for ‘AGW doubters’. No educated person disputes global warming, as thermometers measured 1°C rise from 1850 to 2016 (with pauses).
5) The ‘Greenhouse Hypothesis’, on which IPCC’s belief in AGW is based, is that atmospheric gases trap heat. But this old (19th century) notion is merely an idea, not a hypothesis, because it is untestable, impossible to prove in a laboratory as no experimental container can imitate Earth’s uncontained, well-mixed atmosphere.
6) IPCC computer models are so full of assumptions as to be extremely unreliable, e.g. forecast warming for 1995 to 2015 turned out to be 2-3 times too high ! A likely reason is that the greenhouse idea is nonsense, as explained in recent publications by several scientists. See Bullet 19 for an equally drastic failure of IPCC models. See also here and here.
Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022. Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective.
– Geologist Dr. Roger Higgs
___________________
25 simple bullet points proving CO2 does not cause global warming: by a geologist for a change
Dr Roger Higgs,
Geoclastica Ltd, Technical Note 2019-11,
6th April 2019, on ResearchGate
Not by Fire but by Ice... Robert W. Felix Best Price: $12.95 Buy New $89.71 (as of 09:15 EDT - Details)
We urgently need to expose the ‘CO2 = pollutant’ fallacy being forced upon your children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces by schools, universities, governments and mainstream media worldwide, and to denounce it in scrupulously truthful terms easily understood by the public, including those youngsters themselves.
Here are the 25 bullet points proving CO2’s innocence:
1) Geologists know climate change unrelated to atmospheric CO2 occurred throughout Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history. Yet the IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has no geologists among the hundreds of appointed authors of its Fifth Assessment Report of 2014 and its Sixth Report due in 2022 (see my Technical Note 2019-10). Thus IPCC incredibly lacks both geological input and long-term perspective.
2) IPCC’s very existence relies on public belief in manmade or ‘anthropogenic’ global warming (AGW) by CO2 emissions. Moreover its appointed authors, mostly government and university researchers, are nearly all biased by strong vested interests in AGW, i.e. reputations (publications, lectures) & continuance of salaries & research grants. Similarly, major universities have abandoned their scientific impartiality & integrity by hosting research institutes mandated to confirm & act on AGW, e.g. Grantham Institute (Imperial College), Tyndall Centre.
3) The often-repeated ‘97% consensus among scientists that global warming is man’s fault’ (CO2 emissions) is untrue. It refers in fact to surveys of just a relatively small group of ‘climate scientists’ (a fairly new type of scientist, with strong incentives for bias; see Bullets 2 & 15), moreover only those who are ‘actively publishing’.
4) ‘Climate change denier’ & ‘global warming denier’ are despicable & dishonest terms for ‘AGW doubters’. No educated person disputes global warming, as thermometers measured 1°C rise from 1850 to 2016 (with pauses).
5) The ‘Greenhouse Hypothesis’, on which IPCC’s belief in AGW is based, is that atmospheric gases trap heat. But this old (19th century) notion is merely an idea, not a hypothesis, because it is untestable, impossible to prove in a laboratory as no experimental container can imitate Earth’s uncontained, well-mixed atmosphere.
6) IPCC computer models are so full of assumptions as to be extremely unreliable, e.g. forecast warming for 1995 to 2015 turned out to be 2-3 times too high ! A likely reason is that the greenhouse idea is nonsense, as explained in recent publications by several scientists. See Bullet 19 for an equally drastic failure of IPCC models. See also here and here.
Check article for the rest of the 25, and for the links that back it all up.
Jump to: