I wasn't sure if I should throw this in the economics sub-board. I mean well, it's just that I'm trying to understand more about Bitcoin and its future.
Of something I've studied today is called "purchasing power parity." I also studied some stuff about exchange rates.
Although I could not find someone saying it's true, am I right to understand that it's stupid easy to get a hold of drugs once you buy (or, otherwise said, are in possession of) Bitcoin, as if people just start advertising drugs to you once Bitcoin is in your possession?
I guess that's to say that Bitcoin has a lot of buying power when it comes to drugs relative to the US Dollar. So, it's "cheaper"/easier to buy drugs with Bitcoin than the US Dollar?
PPP does not relate to Bitcoin in the sense that it becomes easier to buy things using one medium or another. It's referring to the ability to buy things (purchase) based on the amount of work put in, something much, much different than the question you're putting forward. Are you sure you learned about PPP in the correct manner? Look up the big mac index if you want to get a better idea of how it all works.
No, Bitcoin does not have a stronger purchasing power for illicit material.
That's untrue, it's easier when the transaction goes on in the dark web or remotely but physically I think the US dollar is often used to perpetuate these activities than any other currency.
Well, if Bitcoin is the currency of the Internet, then it would appear that drugs, guns, and child pornography have been tightly linked with the Internet's purchasing power parity, whereby more of these illicit materials can be bought with BTC than USD (BTC has more value than USD in relation to drugs?). I can understand drugs and guns, but I don't see how a person trying to create his or her own independent government would need child pornography.
I've been looking at this as how a person might be creating a self-autonomous government with various funds and resources while considering purchasing power parity. I assume the BTC purchasing power has been in it's ability to be somewhat anonymous (if you mined for it and/or cover tracks).
I saw the Big Mac index aspect. With a particular currency you can either buy more or less Big Macs with that particular kind of currency. It just seemed like there was some kind of pattern related to drugs and illegal material that I wanted to understand. I guess there was an "easiness" factor in relation to getting materials that I found odd. When you're using the money of the Internet, "Bitcoin," it just gets easier to get certain things. I took a look at some Silk Road prices, and it appears that it was just cheaper to buy stuff on Silk Road than "the street." It appeared that was very much so if a person was using Bitcoin rather than USD, thus the process of shorting USD and using BTC created financial incentive for reduced prices.