I don't see anything biased in your statement and as a matter of truth, you nailed the entire point
While I do know that I'm right (heh
), let's be honest: we both wear advertising for mixers and this means that for anybody looking at this we may be considered biased, no matter how correct are our statements and how valid are our points. That's why I preferred to just say it.
What triggers my question here is because of an incident that happen to someone around my place some time ago, he traded some bitcoin with an unknown scammer on a decentralized exchange got the bitcoin converted into fiat and transferred it to his bank account.
But a few days later his bank account was flagged by the authority and he was ultimately arrested and upon investigation that was when they discovered that the Bitcoin he bought from the exchange in a tented Bitcoin and the proceeds of a scam that have been under investigation.
Now the young trader who is also an undergraduate is forced to face punishment for unknowingly trading with a scammer, we have many of such incidents in the p2p marketplace, so to be at a safe side, one will need to be extra careful by mixing the coins to avoid possible trace and link to your bank account.
Sad story. I think that one safe approach is to use a completely different bank's services when doing crypto. And it's best if that bank is crypto friendly and has a bit of knowledge on the matter.
I guess that the arresting part is overkill and they don't have anything real for pressing charges, still unpleasant.
On the other hand there are services that don't like mixed coins, which one will have to learn to avoid if he has mixed money (or, actually, even if he didn't mix; those services do deserve a boycott).