He doesn't sound like satoshi to me. Too many mistakes in his writing..
"Because he can not sign through the genesis, neither he has the PGP key 0x5EC948A1. People seems to forget some important issues in regards my identity. And trust me, when the time is right, I digitally sign and come forward. So may this be a warning to all wanna bees. Bitcoin, blockchain is partly based on the asymmetric key mechanism, that is why I have PGP keys. The Bitcoin Foundation was very well aware of that as my public key was shared and signed by other core developers of Bitcoin. Until some people did feel the need to try to impersonate me, steal my identity, just because some professor did suggest to provide a noble price for my invention."
https://www.quora.com/profile/Satoshi-Nakamoto-31
Nah..
Topic: "Is it true that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi as he claims?" - page 2. (Read 399 times)
TL;DR
"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!! not to mention that we don't really need another CSW topic feeding this attention whore.
Maybe just another clown that claims to be Satoshi?"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!! not to mention that we don't really need another CSW topic feeding this attention whore.
OP stated it clearly that Craig isn't the real Satoshi and made his point but could he prove it?
As long as the OP couldn't give any solid proof he is just lile Craig that is seeking attention and giving us an entertainment by making a fool out of theirselves.
TL;DR
"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!!
"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!!
Correct indeed, although why 'shoot the messenger' ?!?
- https://youtu.be/VoOG7LEyUJ0 *Shrugs*
TL;DR
"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!! not to mention that we don't really need another CSW topic feeding this attention whore.
"Craig Wright is not Satoshi because he didn't provide any proof. I [the author OP is quoting] claim to be satoshi but I also don't provide any proof".
so my question is why did you think it is even worth the time to read or post here?!! not to mention that we don't really need another CSW topic feeding this attention whore.
To clarify, the below post is not written by me.
"Is it true that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi as he claims?"
- https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-Craig-Wright-is-the-real-Satoshi-as-he-claims/answer/Satoshi-Nakamoto-31
"Craig Wright has no single proof he is me, Satoshi Nakamoto.
The man has a track record of lies and derail.
He does not own the private key of the genesis block, he does not know how it is composed, he can not create from scratch the genesisblock to form the final hash, embedded in the source code of bitcoin.
He does not have the private key of pgp key 0x5ec948a1, known as my pgp key.
He is unable to transact one bitcoin of the whale wallets of the early coins.
He tricked the public using the wrong vistomail account.
He did try to sign and proof in front of Gavin Andresen and the BBC, he did fail.
He was part of the setup to create bitcoin unlimited to enlarge the blocksize, so it would be more difficult for the common man to run a fullnode blockchain on their own hardware, so it would only be for the big players, such as mining farms.
Finally he did launch his own altcoin Bitcoin cash. On websites such as Bitcoin.com ( do notice I registered and transferred bitcoin.org at that time. They did try to derail again, to sell the altcoin as a new bitcoin version or the 'right' bitcoin as intended. Abusing the term bitcoin for their altcoin. Promoting, buy bitcoin, but it was bitcoin cash or bitcoin unlimited, two altcoins.
A hardfork did happen where his altcoin did lose and in the process it was clear, bitcoin cash was prone to the 51 percent attack. More. Only a few miners did play the game.
In the process he did tweet in despair the community to convert bitcoin (core) to his altcoin, bitcoinSV or bsv. Known that it is estimated, I have a whale wallet of 1M btc, you would directly convert yourself, if Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, right?
Also our style and attitude is totally different. I, Satoshin, was NEVER into the play to be a dictator, to patent, to control or lead the project. I always proposed solutions, as my work was given to the public. For sure, there is copyright on the white paper, but this is assigned at creation to the author by international law.
His last steps recently are to claim patents, including an US copyright on my white paper. For that he did pay a small amount of 35 dollar or something, to do an electronic depot of the very well known white paper, bitcoin.pdf However, the office does not verify if the claimant of the copyright does match with the pen name of the author. So they registered the claim for copyright, however.
I, Satoshi Nakamoto, did register the white paper long before the release on the internet in the period 2008–2009 at a Belgian notary office, just in case, this would happen, so in a court case, he would be busted.
Additionally it seems, to my limited knowledge in the matter, you need to file in the 5 years after creation and the paper may not be published to the public. The white paper was published to the public about 10 years ago.
So no doubt, Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
In fact, the community can check this. If all investors in his altcoin bitcoinSV or bsv do convert their coins to the original bitcoin core, btc, you will see for sure, there will be no single bitcoin from the whale wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto, that will be converted to rescue the altcoin.
Of course I can hijack his coin with my whale wallet, but I try to avoid this as long as possible, so I can stay in the grey zone. The reason for this is clear. When I come forward in public, the press will hunt me down like they did with Dorian Nakamoto. Also each day, some people will ask me for bitcoin or my interaction or remarks on the project.
It is pretty comfortable to be in the grey zone.
But this said, I am bold to state, Craig Wright is an imposter if he does claim to be me, Satoshi Nakamoto.
My real name is Jurgen E. G. DEBO, born in Belgium. On twitter @realsatoshin. Reason why I did use the german GMX service. More people are from Europe in the project. Another good developer in the project bitcoin core is from Holland, despite his name sounds…well. And no doubt there are connections with Switzerland, reason why Hal Finney did step in to create the first prototype of my work in the spirit of MiT open source !
As related to my handle, Satoshi Nakamoto means, Sato Shi Naka Moto. The clear vision (wisdom) is in the center (your heart). I used my first, third and last name, 15 characters in an alternation of a caeserian cypher to have 15 letters, to finaly combine them with Japanese words. Finally I used Japanese exit nodes, using tor or sometimes openproxies to hide my IP. Clearly I did respect the Japanese business hours. We learn in Belgium, British English and in school, we did use double space after the dots in typewriting work, so may this explain some questions.
Bitcoin and Blockchain is for the public. It is decentralized. It is designed to live on it's own, without the possibility to manipulate, control or divert the system to people who do have greed, power and ego boost in their minds.
Those who know me, do know, I clearly am open source minded. As I defend higher ethics, like WE the people, WE as community.
So do not have fear. Dr Craig Wright is only a wannabee and another 'faketoshi'.
All the Best
Satoshin"
...
To clarify (again), the above post is not written by me.
Is this guy Satoshin? Who knows?
Certainly does sound a lot more like the real 'Satoshi' who was present on this very forum ...
"Is it true that Craig Wright is the real Satoshi as he claims?"
- https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-Craig-Wright-is-the-real-Satoshi-as-he-claims/answer/Satoshi-Nakamoto-31
"Craig Wright has no single proof he is me, Satoshi Nakamoto.
The man has a track record of lies and derail.
He does not own the private key of the genesis block, he does not know how it is composed, he can not create from scratch the genesisblock to form the final hash, embedded in the source code of bitcoin.
He does not have the private key of pgp key 0x5ec948a1, known as my pgp key.
He is unable to transact one bitcoin of the whale wallets of the early coins.
He tricked the public using the wrong vistomail account.
He did try to sign and proof in front of Gavin Andresen and the BBC, he did fail.
He was part of the setup to create bitcoin unlimited to enlarge the blocksize, so it would be more difficult for the common man to run a fullnode blockchain on their own hardware, so it would only be for the big players, such as mining farms.
Finally he did launch his own altcoin Bitcoin cash. On websites such as Bitcoin.com ( do notice I registered and transferred bitcoin.org at that time. They did try to derail again, to sell the altcoin as a new bitcoin version or the 'right' bitcoin as intended. Abusing the term bitcoin for their altcoin. Promoting, buy bitcoin, but it was bitcoin cash or bitcoin unlimited, two altcoins.
A hardfork did happen where his altcoin did lose and in the process it was clear, bitcoin cash was prone to the 51 percent attack. More. Only a few miners did play the game.
In the process he did tweet in despair the community to convert bitcoin (core) to his altcoin, bitcoinSV or bsv. Known that it is estimated, I have a whale wallet of 1M btc, you would directly convert yourself, if Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto, right?
Also our style and attitude is totally different. I, Satoshin, was NEVER into the play to be a dictator, to patent, to control or lead the project. I always proposed solutions, as my work was given to the public. For sure, there is copyright on the white paper, but this is assigned at creation to the author by international law.
His last steps recently are to claim patents, including an US copyright on my white paper. For that he did pay a small amount of 35 dollar or something, to do an electronic depot of the very well known white paper, bitcoin.pdf However, the office does not verify if the claimant of the copyright does match with the pen name of the author. So they registered the claim for copyright, however.
I, Satoshi Nakamoto, did register the white paper long before the release on the internet in the period 2008–2009 at a Belgian notary office, just in case, this would happen, so in a court case, he would be busted.
Additionally it seems, to my limited knowledge in the matter, you need to file in the 5 years after creation and the paper may not be published to the public. The white paper was published to the public about 10 years ago.
So no doubt, Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
In fact, the community can check this. If all investors in his altcoin bitcoinSV or bsv do convert their coins to the original bitcoin core, btc, you will see for sure, there will be no single bitcoin from the whale wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto, that will be converted to rescue the altcoin.
Of course I can hijack his coin with my whale wallet, but I try to avoid this as long as possible, so I can stay in the grey zone. The reason for this is clear. When I come forward in public, the press will hunt me down like they did with Dorian Nakamoto. Also each day, some people will ask me for bitcoin or my interaction or remarks on the project.
It is pretty comfortable to be in the grey zone.
But this said, I am bold to state, Craig Wright is an imposter if he does claim to be me, Satoshi Nakamoto.
My real name is Jurgen E. G. DEBO, born in Belgium. On twitter @realsatoshin. Reason why I did use the german GMX service. More people are from Europe in the project. Another good developer in the project bitcoin core is from Holland, despite his name sounds…well. And no doubt there are connections with Switzerland, reason why Hal Finney did step in to create the first prototype of my work in the spirit of MiT open source !
As related to my handle, Satoshi Nakamoto means, Sato Shi Naka Moto. The clear vision (wisdom) is in the center (your heart). I used my first, third and last name, 15 characters in an alternation of a caeserian cypher to have 15 letters, to finaly combine them with Japanese words. Finally I used Japanese exit nodes, using tor or sometimes openproxies to hide my IP. Clearly I did respect the Japanese business hours. We learn in Belgium, British English and in school, we did use double space after the dots in typewriting work, so may this explain some questions.
Bitcoin and Blockchain is for the public. It is decentralized. It is designed to live on it's own, without the possibility to manipulate, control or divert the system to people who do have greed, power and ego boost in their minds.
Those who know me, do know, I clearly am open source minded. As I defend higher ethics, like WE the people, WE as community.
So do not have fear. Dr Craig Wright is only a wannabee and another 'faketoshi'.
All the Best
Satoshin"
...
To clarify (again), the above post is not written by me.
Is this guy Satoshin? Who knows?
Certainly does sound a lot more like the real 'Satoshi' who was present on this very forum ...
Jump to: