Pages:
Author

Topic: Is KYC bad for crypto? - page 11. (Read 1191 times)

hero member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 506
Betking.io - Best Bitcoin Casino
March 27, 2020, 08:45:19 PM
#4
In some cases regulations are necessary to put an end to fraud and corruption in the crypto/Blockchain industry. By requiring KYC compliance on centralized exchanges, the crypto world could become a better place. However, the mere fact that you'd need to provide some sort of ID verification would completely destroy the purpose of crypto. I've seen situations where centralized exchanges became hacked, putting customers' identities at risk. Last time I've heard, someone hacked Binance and threatened to expose customer's identities across the web.

This makes me to believe that KYC does more harm than good for crypto. Of course, regulation is necessary in order to legitimize the industry in its entirety. Institutional investors, conglomerates, and other entities will find crypto regulatory-compliant for their own needs. But knowing that KYC goes against crypto's principles, could make the entire industry similar to traditional banking.

What are your thoughts? Huh
Exposing our private details is very risky especially if it will go to the wrong hands as they can do whatever they like. And what worst is that they can use our private details in shady transactions if they like to do so without our consent.

But with regards to exchanges especially those centralized one, most of them are asking for KYC because they want to prevent any fraud so we don't have other option but to follow their rules if we want to use their exchange. It is bad for crypto if it will be use in shady transaction but if it will be use correctly then it will not that bad at all, let's just hope that every exchange will tighten their security so hackers cannot penetrate their databases.
copper member
Activity: 406
Merit: 1
March 27, 2020, 08:08:31 PM
#3
I am not against KYC but KYC is against the purpose of crypto. In Bitcoin whitepaper shows the purpose of it, transaction without information about parties, and without hand of banks. Everything is incognito. It seems that we're going backwards when accept KYC when joining crypto.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 267
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
March 27, 2020, 07:21:59 PM
#2
actually this kind of incident I also disagree but because the rules made require us to do the KYC, if not then we can not transaction in it. if the report for KYC does not affect all transaction activities maybe I will not give. because for me the identity must be properly protected because it is very dangerous to give to authorities that we don't know or may not even trust. because it could be the identity can be misused. this is a dilemma that must be resolved as soon as possible without reducing the essence of the goal for improvement.
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1363
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
March 27, 2020, 06:33:52 PM
#1
In some cases regulations are necessary to put an end to fraud and corruption in the crypto/Blockchain industry. By requiring KYC compliance on centralized exchanges, the crypto world could become a better place. However, the mere fact that you'd need to provide some sort of ID verification would completely destroy the purpose of crypto. I've seen situations where centralized exchanges became hacked, putting customers' identities at risk. Last time I've heard, someone hacked Binance and threatened to expose customer's identities across the web.

This makes me to believe that KYC does more harm than good for crypto. Of course, regulation is necessary in order to legitimize the industry in its entirety. Institutional investors, conglomerates, and other entities will find crypto regulatory-compliant for their own needs. But knowing that KYC goes against crypto's principles, could make the entire industry similar to traditional banking.

What are your thoughts? Huh
Pages:
Jump to: