Topic: Is Paul Solotshi the pseudonymous Satoshi? - page 3. (Read 723 times)
Even if Paul is Satoshi i not have any problem who is and even if not found who is i will continue use bitcoin and i think is a good thing that he create bitcoin and help a lot of people to make some money.
There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date.
Do we really care at this point who the real Satoshi is, there is no point in speculating over and over with the same topic and every day someone will be linking someone to something just to get the right amount of hits for their website and nothing else, it is better to leave him alone unless Satoshi wants to come out from his hibernation. 
There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/
What are your thoughts?
What are your thoughts?
Literally no one knows about the truth! What is going on in the market now, is pure speculation! However, personally I will not be happy if Paul Solotshi is proved as a creator of bitcoin! His existing linkage with criminality is making me worried because Bitcoin is generally taken very negatively by a lot of people. Now if it's proved that the creator of bitcoin is already serving prison term, it will make things worse!
I don't know the truth though! If he the rightful creator of bitcoin, he may get back his right! But criminal link with the creator of bitcoin is not a good thing for the community as well as for the bitcoin!
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
It could be true, and we know that the possibility will always there as we don't know the truth.
We will see much other theory about who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but that will not make us to even closer to him because he still hiding in somewhere place that we don't know.
Anybody can be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, especially if there is any document that will support him as Satoshi Nakamoto.
Like you said anybody can be Satoshi Nakamoto for there no genuine evidence provide to proof all the people mentioned all this while to be Satoshi. However, someone who wants to be anonymous will definitely not use a nick which is almost similar to his name.We will see much other theory about who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but that will not make us to even closer to him because he still hiding in somewhere place that we don't know.
Anybody can be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, especially if there is any document that will support him as Satoshi Nakamoto.
In the meantime, let us give our fingers crossed.
There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/
What are your thoughts?
What are your thoughts?
It all adds up, the theory is well presented that points that we have finally found the real Satoshi Nakamoto, the writer explanations are very clear and he connected all the dots perfectly, this is a breakthrough article,let's see where it will lead us, the explanation that the 1 million Bitcoin cannot be move is because Satoshi is spending his time in jail, where access to computer is very limited to none, sounds credible.
is a very interesting theory, but without any proof. so far we have many suppositions of who is satoshi and we also have many faketoshis. Which makes me very intrigued is why someone would create something anonymous and after many years would want to leave the anonymity but could not present any proof that is the real creator of bitcoin? another point that makes me curious, I believe now if the real satoshi showed his face, he would not be arrested because he did not commit any crime, which leads me to my curiosity, why the real satoshi does not show his face? Is the real satoshi dead?
if we start calling everyone who is named Satoshi or has a name that is similar looking or sounding like Satoshi then we will have to go through the list of names for at least another 10 years!
besides, the first thing you need to understand is that Satoshi Nakamoto is just a fake name so there is no way that the real personality was named anything remotely similar.
for example my name is not even close to my user name (BrewMaster)!
besides, the first thing you need to understand is that Satoshi Nakamoto is just a fake name so there is no way that the real personality was named anything remotely similar.
for example my name is not even close to my user name (BrewMaster)!
No, just like how Dorian isn't Satoshi, sure there may be a bit more credentials pushing this one but the time zone worked is wrong and I would suggest the coin never moving as well
There is a good theory behind this article and we can see multiple reasons why Paul Solotshi could actually be Satoshi Nakamoto. The problem is it could all be a coincidence and even though there are many arguments sustaining the theory behind all of this there isn't any notable proof. There have been many people trying to prove they are the the real Satoshi but so far none of them succeed and that's surely going to continue until the real Satoshi will reveal himself.
I am unlikely to be a believer of this another candidate to be Satoshi just because of "Solotshi" Paul Le Roux would be the real Satoshi and a likely have a link with wright can be very deceiving indeed in my opinion, And even though he is familiar with C++ there are many well-known Programmers that are knowledgable enough, Even I am familiar with C++ as well, Maybe I can become a candidate myself, And I am not being biased with the thing that he is being a criminal but because if Paul would be Satoshi he would not think of any criminal acts and he would be brilliant with the things he will do.
So mcafee was going to reveal this person ? ; ) And here another person on the speculation list.
There are incriminating evidences suggesting that Paul Solotshi is the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in an article I just read this morning. It points clearly that one of the reasons that the Satoshi's one million Bitcoin hasn't moved is because the fellow has been in orison since 2002 till date. Below is the link and it makes for an interesting and convincing read. https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/
What are your thoughts?
It could be true but we could never know unless he could proves it .What are your thoughts?
The fact that Paul was a smuggler and crypto or Bitcoin gives total anonymity to the users are very interesting.
Maybe it was the reason if Paul is the true Satoshi then Bitcoin was clearly created to be a way to smuggle or be used for illegal activity.
It would be his perfect get away or easy way to transact in the internet anonymously .
I get it that figuring out who Satoshi potentially could be in the past was an interesting topic, but it's starting to become pretty annoying with how news outlets continue with this bs today. I really don't see any point in continuing this when the only valid bit of evidence is a signature from the address containing the genesis block reward.
I'm sure they eventually will find someone named Sato Naka and then again the whole media circus show starts from scratch.
I'm sure that if the real Satoshi is watching, he's rolling on the floor laughing at how stupid this space is. Must be happy to have left and never come back. His coins go up in value anyway, so what is there to come back for? No one of that level is going to waste time here.
I'm sure they eventually will find someone named Sato Naka and then again the whole media circus show starts from scratch.
I'm sure that if the real Satoshi is watching, he's rolling on the floor laughing at how stupid this space is. Must be happy to have left and never come back. His coins go up in value anyway, so what is there to come back for? No one of that level is going to waste time here.
Out of many theories and claims about who is satoshi, this one is the most interesting IMO.
But of course, until satoshi don't reveal himself by doing such—people will not be convinced anything written or read from such article(s).
So better don't expect satoshi will come back anymore, except to this paranoid who claim that he is and using legal sh*t to those people who are against him by saying frauds, while he himself is a fraud.
But of course, until satoshi don't reveal himself by doing such—people will not be convinced anything written or read from such article(s).
So better don't expect satoshi will come back anymore, except to this paranoid who claim that he is and using legal sh*t to those people who are against him by saying frauds, while he himself is a fraud.
The article is very interesting but I really don't believe the real Satoshi Nakamoto will be a cartel boss. It's just another article trying to unravel the original creator of bitcoin. Even from the prison one can give out a code to a trusted visitor to help out in real life affairs. Paul Solotshi is not the real Satoshi
there have been a lot of claims that they found or they are satoshi nakamoto and it's kind of
getting annoying.
Annoying indeed. None of these claims are mildly interesting in my opinion since 99.999% of them are wrong and no one will ever know who the real Satoshi actually was. He is like Jack the Ripper of this age which is amazing considering the technological advancements.getting annoying.
It's impossible, because Craig Wright is. 
You found him. Damn. I actually thought Trump was Satoshi all this time. If he could fool a big part of USA, why can't he fool the rest of the world? 
we can all guess, assume or make an investigation of who really satoshi nakamoto is but at the end of the day there are still
no confirmation if it is really him. there have been a lot of claims that they found or they are satoshi nakamoto and it's kind of
getting annoying. the article is interesting though.
no confirmation if it is really him. there have been a lot of claims that they found or they are satoshi nakamoto and it's kind of
getting annoying. the article is interesting though.
It's impossible, because Craig Wright is.
Well, it's possible but we can't deny the fact that no matter how many articles we read, we still got no assurance about the information that we're reading. It could be true but might also be a way to deceive us. There are still lots of things that we have to know about Paul Salotshi before we confirm and conclude that he's the real Satoshi.
Honestly, I'm not really convinced by this article. As for me, it's just another Satoshi candidate. The good thing is Paul is not making noise so his name would sound appealing just like what Craig Wright did. However, the truth will still speak for itself in time and the truth about Satoshi will prevail if he, himself would open up about everything about his identity.
Jump to: