Pages:
Author

Topic: Is planting trees actually good for the planet? (Read 1061 times)

full member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 228
Omicron is another FUD
December 17, 2020, 09:02:22 AM
Quote
Benefits of planting trees for health and the environment

1. Make the air fresher
2. Maintain mental health
3. Reducing exposure to UV rays to the skin
4. Reducing the impacts of climate change
5. Prevent water pollution
6. Increase groundwater reserves
7. Maintain the population of living things
8. Prevent flooding
9. Prevent soil erosion

carbon dioxide & oxygen has nothing to do with trees because the oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in the earth are fixed (can't increase or decrease)..
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 37
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
Planting trees is very important as it’s gives the earth green effects. Plants plays lots of economical roles to man.
Planting trees gives the environment beautiful look and helps in controlling heavy winds and erosion
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
One neglected aspect of arboriculture is the treatment of "dead" trees. When a tree can no longer stand on its own roots, and it falls to the ground, it should be left to decay naturally. This allows beetles and other creatures to find food and homes, and the activities of fungi help to maintain a healthy soil balance.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
Speaking as someone who has planted hundreds of trees, and carefully observed which lived, which didn't and why, I'm not convinced that the average person "planting trees because it's a good thing" does anything other than waste their time.
I believe botanist are the best at what ways and soil is best for a tree special and the best care that could be given to it and you might be a botanist yourself, I don't know that so I won't want to comment on that either but then, I don't so much agree with the idea that an average person planting trees is just a waste of time.

If it is about the fact that, planting non native species or invasive species could be harmful to the vegetation of that environment and in turn the environment itself, that I would understand but then, should native species be planted, even if it didn't get to grow to its full potential, for the years it did grew and persisted, it surely helped as cover crop, air cycles (Carbon, nitrogen etc) and shelter for aboral and terrestrial animals including the microbes so, it did help and it isn't a total waste of time.

A botanist really would be an expert, but you won't expect them to plant as many trees for the environment itself, they are busy doing their researches about plants, discovering something, and many more. A lot of documents and articles can be easily found in the internet, and you don't need a degree for that.

What I am going through with this is that anyone can plant trees and make it work for the environment, it is just that if they really care about the planting itself, they would go through the ways on how to nurture it, how to plant it, the distance needed between them.

But aside that, I agree that trees are really helpful, if that is what just this thread is asking.
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 504
Speaking as someone who has planted hundreds of trees, and carefully observed which lived, which didn't and why, I'm not convinced that the average person "planting trees because it's a good thing" does anything other than waste their time.
I believe botanist are the best at what ways and soil is best for a tree special and the best care that could be given to it and you might be a botanist yourself, I don't know that so I won't want to comment on that either but then, I don't so much agree with the idea that an average person planting trees is just a waste of time.

If it is about the fact that, planting non native species or invasive species could be harmful to the vegetation of that environment and in turn the environment itself, that I would understand but then, should native species be planted, even if it didn't get to grow to its full potential, for the years it did grew and persisted, it surely helped as cover crop, air cycles (Carbon, nitrogen etc) and shelter for aboral and terrestrial animals including the microbes so, it did help and it isn't a total waste of time.
full member
Activity: 368
Merit: 107
Trees are our closest friends. It protects our ozone layer as well as regulates the weather. Take a look at the Amazon rainforest in Brazil. By burning it we have dripped the heart of the weather. Then the COVID-19 invaded our hearts. It is not possible to benefit by harming anyone. The importance of the tree should be realized by everyone after this.
hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 534
The. Importance of tree to the environment are enormous both from it abiotic and biotic factors. Environmentally Trees 🌲 beautify environment and gives it colorful look. In time of environmental disasters trees help is controlling erosion and leaching, trees help to control excessive wind. Trees brings shade and makes the surrounding cool in hot days. Lots of good medicine have been discovered some special trees and the herbs help in saving life’s. Trees are used for beautification and it’s also supply man with oxygen to breath.

I agree with you, Trees are important for all of us and everyone can feel the difference. Especially this year again we had the highest temperatures in years in my country. Being in the forest instead of the city makes such a huge difference to climate. We feel much better and can relax more than staying in the city during summer.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 37
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
The. Importance of tree to the environment are enormous both from it abiotic and biotic factors. Environmentally Trees 🌲 beautify environment and gives it colorful look. In time of environmental disasters trees help is controlling erosion and leaching, trees help to control excessive wind. Trees brings shade and makes the surrounding cool in hot days. Lots of good medicine have been discovered some special trees and the herbs help in saving life’s. Trees are used for beautification and it’s also supply man with oxygen to breath.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Is planting trees actually good for the planet?


It depends on what percent of them survive the planting.


Cool
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
~SNIP~

This is probably because, of the generality of this information about the benefits of trees in human lives and environments. So the assumptions that people made in this thread are most probably based on that information. In addition, some of the ideas given in this thread are from personal experiences.

Speaking as someone who has planted hundreds of trees, and carefully observed which lived, which didn't and why, I'm not convinced that the average person "planting trees because it's a good thing" does anything other than waste their time.

Now if they want to learn something, they can all start digging holes under my direction.

Why did the room get empty so suddenly?

As someone who happens to also experience that planting tree drives. Planting trees doesn't end in just planting a seedling in a forest/mountain. The real thing about this is how to nurture and cultivate those trees. I am not a fan of those planting thousands of trees in one day just for the commercialization of it, and fact that they think they actually help. But instead, only 1/8 or less of those trees can lived due to lack of nutrition in soil and many other aspects.

The people who brag about their planting of 100's etc. are most likely a social climber who want to make themselves feel highly just because they think they made an awesome change for their surrounding.

On the other hand, there are many people who actually made time to nurture seedlings in forest and sees them grow. I actually watched a person in the Philippines, who plant hundreds of trees, and nurtured them but can't search the news article for it.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
tree's benefit carbon, benefit human lungs
tree's benefit the lumber industry

when lumber companies can plant tree's at no cost due to donations/grants from charity/government. it makes them instant profit at time of chopping them down and turning them into planks a couple decades later

here is some factual carbon stats
normal rainforests per hectare: absorb ~40tonnes of carbon. release 7tonnes of oxygen
oil palm plantation per hectare: absorb ~60tonnes of carbon. release 18tonnes of oxygen

this is because palm oil requires different amount of hydrocarbons/carbohydrates.

so when you pay some environmental charities to plant high carbon absorbing high oxygen releasing plants. the money can end up in the deforestation companies that turn old rainforests into palm tree plantations. because yep. good for human lungs.

some then argue its destroying natural habitats for tribes and wildlife. but thats another debate aside from the carbon one

..
its much like paying carbon tax.. where funds end up as 'R&D' funds for fossil companies to pay for conversion to renewables. yep examples of UK national grid allience are not paying for renewables out of their own profits, not out the goodness of their hearts. government funding and grants pay for their conversions
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I am not that convinced about this forest planting theory. Trees do absorb carbon from the atmosphere. But they store the carbon in their wood and release it when they die. Also, in my area I have seen a lot of grasslands being converted to artificial forests. They are disrupting the natural ecology by doing this. The ecosystem that existed earlier won't be able to survive once the trees are planted.

It's interesting how on this thread many have asserted the goodness of planting trees, but not one has made an effort to prove it.

This is probably because, of the generality of this information about the benefits of trees in human lives and environments. So the assumptions that people made in this thread are most probably based on that information. In addition, some of the ideas given in this thread are from personal experiences.

Speaking as someone who has planted hundreds of trees, and carefully observed which lived, which didn't and why, I'm not convinced that the average person "planting trees because it's a good thing" does anything other than waste their time.

Now if they want to learn something, they can all start digging holes under my direction.

Why did the room get empty so suddenly?
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567
It is and every citizen of this planet with fertile soil should be obliged to plant trees, trees are very important a lot of floods are caused by lacks of trees, we need a lot of trees because illegal logging is on the rise they are cutting trees for money, it's very important to our ecosystem without them we are doomed.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I am not that convinced about this forest planting theory. Trees do absorb carbon from the atmosphere. But they store the carbon in their wood and release it when they die. Also, in my area I have seen a lot of grasslands being converted to artificial forests. They are disrupting the natural ecology by doing this. The ecosystem that existed earlier won't be able to survive once the trees are planted.

It's interesting how on this thread many have asserted the goodness of planting trees, but not one has made an effort to prove it.

This is probably because, of the generality of this information about the benefits of trees in human lives and environments. So the assumptions that people made in this thread are most probably based on that information. In addition, some of the ideas given in this thread are from personal experiences.
hero member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 504
If you accept the theories of science that describes trees to be a recycling agent as well as providing homes for the variant species available then yes, planting of trees does help a great deal.

You tend to base your arguments on trees producing canopies which in turn brings about increased heat on the soil surface, this is very much not true. The rays from the sunlight hits the leaves of these trees which has formed into a canopy to provide some sort of soil cover and are not reflected due to the nature of the leaves having some level of moisture content hence, it provides a cooling effect on the soil. This explains why, beneath a tree in a tropical rainforest, shrubs and grasses tends to strive more as they are not exposed much to direct sunlight.
Again, should it be that, the soil experience some level of heat, you might as well know that, there are themophilic bacterias which requires some level of heat to strive in the humid soil of that environment and deforestation could result in caking up the soil and as such, won't be very beneficial to these bacterias.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
maths..
it will take more available fertile land than that is available to offset the current carbon emmisions

the tree's however only work best if they are in reach of the area that has carbon emmissions
EG smoggy london vs brazilian rainforest mass in 1800 did not help each other.

so although there are less brazilian rainforests now. does not mean london is any worse.

london smog got better by getting rid of wood/coal burnong homes and replacing it with gas heated waterheaters

yep buy buy chimney sweep industry due to removing the emissions not by trees

however smog(excess carbon) did not cause global warming. london was colder during its smoggy history
so much so the river thames froze over

..
so again as a reminder. for climate issues. its not about carbon. its about the water cycle.
carbon emissions is a separate category concerning lung health
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
I am not that convinced about this forest planting theory. Trees do absorb carbon from the atmosphere. But they store the carbon in their wood and release it when they die. Also, in my area I have seen a lot of grasslands being converted to artificial forests. They are disrupting the natural ecology by doing this. The ecosystem that existed earlier won't be able to survive once the trees are planted.

It's interesting how on this thread many have asserted the goodness of planting trees, but not one has made an effort to prove it.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
I am not that convinced about this forest planting theory. Trees do absorb carbon from the atmosphere. But they store the carbon in their wood and release it when they die. Also, in my area I have seen a lot of grasslands being converted to artificial forests. They are disrupting the natural ecology by doing this. The ecosystem that existed earlier won't be able to survive once the trees are planted.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
funny how nasa wants to know about the water cycle in regards to off world settlements. they are not talking about carbon

funny how nasa use hydrogen for their radiation/heat shield.. not carbon

hint
be concerned more about water. not carbon
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386


Why is planting a tree not a good thing now?

Of course, it's good....
No, it's not.

Planting cactus is good.
Pages:
Jump to: