Is Satoshi really Steve Gibson from qrc.com? [dispute this gossip]

FlappySocks

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: SteveB on March 23, 2011, 09:30:26 PM

If Steve had written the bitcoin client it would be:
- less than 100kb in size
- written in assembler
- cost $ 89.00
- no new version in 7 years

Ha ha. Before I even opened this thread, this sums up my first thought from reading the subject line.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2970

Terminated.

Quote from: em3rgentOrdr on March 24, 2011, 04:47:56 AM

Quote from: SteveB on March 23, 2011, 09:30:26 PM

There is no way Steve Gibson wrote the bitcoin client!

If Steve had written the bitcoin client it would be:
- less than 100kb in size
- written in assembler
- cost $ 89.00
- no new version in 7 years

I bet you could get the core workings of bitcoin much smaller, maybe < 4kb.

One must try to understand humor.
Good one anyhow. The Bitcoin client is actually not very well coded.

DrMike

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

This may be necromancy, but I'll give it a push. Steve is a smart man, but he's ten years older than me and has the burden of appearing correct (all-of-the-time).

As a young man I was often critical of tech specialists, because I had to tell them how to implement new mime types for media content etc. I was a student paid to work for different departments at my university. Today I do this stuff for fun (build and restore retro systems) and to help people who won't let go of their old computers. That would be, old people at-near-or-above fifty.

Back in the day Steve was just one 'us', which totaled about 30-40 thousand active users. Long before he was popular he helped many people like me get with the need for firewalls and antivirus software. Most early developers questioned the need to address pranks (such as the kind we played upon our professors - your PC is Stoned), because no one thought anyone would be so malevolent.

I was wrong and have been wrong a thousand times since. I have, however, been right a many fold more times since. Often it is better to be wrong than to fail to act.

Food-for-thought...

grondilu

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1080

My short answer:

no.

em3rgentOrdr

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

youtube.com/ericfontainejazz now accepts bitcoin

Quote from: SteveB on March 23, 2011, 09:30:26 PM

There is no way Steve Gibson wrote the bitcoin client!

If Steve had written the bitcoin client it would be:
- less than 100kb in size
- written in assembler
- cost $ 89.00
- no new version in 7 years

I bet you could get the core workings of bitcoin much smaller, maybe < 4kb.

CryptikEnigma

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 101

Quote from: SteveB on March 23, 2011, 09:30:26 PM

There is no way Steve Gibson wrote the bitcoin client!

If Steve had written the bitcoin client it would be:
- less than 100kb in size
- written in assembler
- cost $ 89.00
- no new version in 7 years

lmao

SteveB

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

There is no way Steve Gibson wrote the bitcoin client!

If Steve had written the bitcoin client it would be:
- less than 100kb in size
- written in assembler
- cost $ 89.00
- no new version in 7 years

CryptikEnigma

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 101

Quote from: hazek on March 23, 2011, 02:17:01 PM

Quote from: SATOSHl on March 23, 2011, 01:59:14 PM

I am not steve gibson. I write better code than him. I am japanese!!!

I guess you think you're funny huh? Roll Eyes

I thought it was pretty funny >.>

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

What a load of crap.

I didn't even bother reading after the "spyware" thing, LOL.

gigitrix

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Absolute rubbish. For one thing: he's too damn busy. Weekly podcasts, huge mailbag, and publicly viewable mailing lists! He can't develop two things at once. Plus he programs everything in Assembly Language (no really, even his webserver AFAIK), so there's no way he'd be so dependent on the technologies that bitcoin uses (I don't think he's ever released anything intended for non-Windows systems). Why would he wait until now to debut the program on his show when he demos everything he makes on the podcast as soon as possible. Why was he visibly and audibly ecstatic about finding his first block? Why would he admit that it has potential legal issues (assuming you guys think he is in it for the money, and isn't just running this giant conspiracy for kicks).

Anyone who can read all that and still think he is Satoshi is skilled in the art of tinhattery.

ryepdx

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote

Attention!!
Submitted by troy on Wed, 03/23/2011 - 05:19.
After having a fallout with real networks...

So many issues with what he's saying here.

curator

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Wow. And, no.

Steve is the real deal and I've been listening to him for years on 'Security Now!'. I do believe that if it wasn't for him, there would be scads more zombi-fied computers out there, and technology/R&D would have been hampered in its march to the future.

'troy' needs a new hobby.

hazek

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1003

Quote from: SATOSHl on March 23, 2011, 01:59:14 PM

I am not steve gibson. I write better code than him. I am japanese!!!

I guess you think you're funny huh? Roll Eyes

SATOSHl

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

I am not steve gibson. I write better code than him. I am japanese!!!

JohnDoe

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 251

Quote from: kiba on March 23, 2011, 09:04:30 AM

Steve Gibson definitely understood bitcoin.

Compare Steve Gibson's explanation to Gavin's explanation on that radio show to see what I mean.

CCCMikey

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

He rakes in so much money with the elderly SpinRite program, and is so busy with other nicknacks, and is spooked about crypto disclosure possibly being forced on him for CryptoLink vaporware - I can't see he'd have the time or inclination

kiba

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1020

Quote from: JohnDoe on March 23, 2011, 08:58:44 AM

No way. He didn't come off as someone who understood Bitcoin very well in that podcast, so he couldn't be satoshi unless he purposely tried to sound less knowledgeable. Also spyware creation/prevention doesn't have anything to do with cryptography as far as I know so that part of the argument is worthless. People like theymos or gavin are way more likely to be satoshi in my opinion.

Steve Gibson definitely understood bitcoin.

JohnDoe

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 251

No way. He didn't come off as someone who understood Bitcoin very well in that podcast, so he couldn't be satoshi unless he purposely tried to sound less knowledgeable. Also spyware creation/prevention doesn't have anything to do with cryptography as far as I know so that part of the argument is worthless. People like theymos or gavin are way more likely to be satoshi in my opinion.

Scorpion

hero member

Activity: 887

Merit: 516

Bitcoin OG

>>Submitted by troy on Tue, 03/22/2011 - 23:51.
>>In fact, now I'm positive gibson is the author of the code because it's got his damn signature all over it. He's the only programmer in the world that religiously uses IRC protocol to push data around. That's his M.O.

Roll Eyes

That's his reasoning?

Cdecker

hero member

Activity: 489

Merit: 505

I don't think these "Satoshi is the reincarnation of Jesus" rumors will ever end, unless Satoshi comes forward. But I find them quite amusing Cheesy

Topic: Is Satoshi really Steve Gibson from qrc.com? [dispute this gossip] (Read 5009 times)