When you first install it, a simple act as "adding" a token will cost you a fee in Sol. Not only is it centralized in terms of the consensus mechanism, it is extremely centralized in terms of distribution. Most of the Solana is held by VCs and other backers who got their tokens for pennies.
The pump has mainly been due to some big names putting their weight behind it, which as usual led to retail sheep buying it up with dreams in their eyes. Needless to say that those hopes evaporated with the drop in prices.
On top of all this, the blockchain has now "stopped" producing blocks at 2 instances for days together. At such time, the developers just "restart" the chain. All along this time, retail and small players remain stuck while the "developers" can easily provide access to the bigger players on their own terms (Its majorly owned by VCs).
If Solana is the future of blockchain, then it is a clear indication that this space will surely go to zero.
Most people are blind enough to see what's behind Solana, since they're only following the hype. Decentralization is what it's all about in order to make crypto/Blockchain tech work as intended. The limited distribution of SOL and the centralized design of the network itself, tells us that we should look for other options. Who'd want to use a chain that's subject to constant network disruptions? Businesses and merchants want something that's stable and reliable. Not something that can go down periodically.
Something similar happened to IOTA where the network came to a halt of couple of times. Now it's "dead lost" behind other coins in market cap, as people moved on to other big things in crypto. The same might happen to Solana if developers don't take decentralization seriously. You can see why so many "Ethereum Killers" have been unable to beat Ethereum after all these years. Without decentralization among alternative chains, there's really no competitor against ETH. Who knows what will be of Solana within the next 5-10 years? Just my thoughts