Pages:
Author

Topic: is the network hash dropping? - page 2. (Read 7204 times)

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
November 08, 2013, 10:06:33 PM
#34
I think it could also be some of the early asic hardware being shut down....basically usb erupters are useless, Japalpeno's are just like 25 usb erupters so they are useless as well, do the gen 1 ASICMiner blades still make anything on a daily basis?

I haven't had my usb erupter plugged in for quite a while...it just doesn't matter anymore.
It was only making a fraction of a cent per day...maybe the electricity isn't much either but it isn't worth me thinking about it anymore.
My Saturn is generating a decent amount each day and it eclipses anything put out by the USB or Jalapeno.

There have to be others shutting down their old ASIC hardware as well...and nobody can possibly be running gpu rigs anymore(?)

Also, I think that the hardware market is just saturated.... nothing you can buy makes a profit...and no one has any tolerance for mining at a loss.
 
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
November 08, 2013, 09:57:11 PM
#33
A little early to tell but the current estimate is for "only" a 19% hike at the next adjustment:

http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

It looks to me that the 504 and 1008 block hash rate plots are very telling for the last 3 or 4 difficulty jumps.  I haven't done enough research to say definitely, nor do I care enough to spend the time, but perhaps someone more in tune with the large scale ASIC market will know...

It would seem that big ASIC batches are being tested used on the customer's dime up to the point of a difficulty jump, then boxed up and shipped out.  Meaning the manufacturers get the benefit of the difficulty not yet accounting for the massive increase in hashing power and the customer gets screwed out of the advantage of being the first on the network with new hardware.

I can't seem to explain otherwise the clear pattern of large jumps in hashrate, a big drop around the difficulty jump, then a slow ramp up (accounting for difference in shipping to customers world-wide) in hashrate.  Call me a skeptic, but heck if I was running one of these mining hardware companies, it would be awful hard to resist the temptation to explain away a one or two week delay in shipping with some BS while taking advantage of the relative easy difficulty.

I'm sure if someone was so inclined, they could do the legwork and either confirm or deny a correlation between rapid hash-rate drop offs and large batch ASIC shipments.  Perhaps even some blockchain sluething to correlate that mining income with a small group of addresses...
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
November 08, 2013, 09:28:43 PM
#32
A little early to tell but the current estimate is for "only" a 19% hike at the next adjustment:

http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
sr. member
Activity: 330
Merit: 250
November 08, 2013, 09:03:56 PM
#31
Miners that are unsuccessful at overclocking?
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 250
November 08, 2013, 08:24:23 PM
#30
Its funny how the hash rate dropped in the days immediately before the diff. change, and then immediately after the diff. change the hash rate jumps right back to pre-dropping levels. It's more than variance. Someone is  'trying' to game the diff. changes.

From https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty

Quote
The difficulty is adjusted every 2016 blocks based on the time it took to find the previous 2016 blocks. At the desired rate of one block each 10 minutes, 2016 blocks would take exactly two weeks to find. If the previous 2016 blocks took more than two weeks to find, the difficulty is reduced. If they took less than two weeks, the difficulty is increased. The change in difficulty is in proportion to the amount of time over or under two weeks the previous 2016 blocks took to find.

Since the difficulty is adjusted based on the entire 2016 block period, reducing the hash rate during the last few days would have little effect on the actual adjustment value.  The only thing turning off your miner(s) during the last few days does is to reduce your own income at the lower difficulty - which makes no sense.

Yes, I know and understand this. Hence the emphasis on 'trying'.

Looks like that news may have been the result.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
November 08, 2013, 12:12:13 PM
#29
maybe this is where the GH went?

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/

"CoinLab Chief Executive Peter Vessenes has said that the lawsuit was a contributing factor in last week’s bankruptcy filing of CoinLab’s mining unit, which is called Alydian Inc. Mr. Vessenes is also chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation, a nonprofit trade group that promotes the virtual currency.

Mr. Vessenes noted in an email on Thursday that CoinLab itself has no mining operations, but “of course we will comply (with the judge’s order) as well as we’re able.” It isn’t clear if Alydian is still generating bitcoin while it is under bankruptcy protection."

good find.  Either someone shutdown their mining operations (coinlab?), terahash machines are breaking left and right or tera hash machines are on their way to customers. Time will tell

thanks!  and my other thought was knc unplugging and packing up their second batch, which someone already mentioned.  anyone know what hardware Alydian used?  Might we see it hit the market?
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
November 08, 2013, 11:33:41 AM
#28
maybe this is where the GH went?

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/

"CoinLab Chief Executive Peter Vessenes has said that the lawsuit was a contributing factor in last week’s bankruptcy filing of CoinLab’s mining unit, which is called Alydian Inc. Mr. Vessenes is also chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation, a nonprofit trade group that promotes the virtual currency.

Mr. Vessenes noted in an email on Thursday that CoinLab itself has no mining operations, but “of course we will comply (with the judge’s order) as well as we’re able.” It isn’t clear if Alydian is still generating bitcoin while it is under bankruptcy protection."

good find.  Either someone shutdown their mining operations (coinlab?), terahash machines are breaking left and right or tera hash machines are on their way to customers. Time will tell
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
November 08, 2013, 10:41:16 AM
#27
maybe this is where the GH went?

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/

"CoinLab Chief Executive Peter Vessenes has said that the lawsuit was a contributing factor in last week’s bankruptcy filing of CoinLab’s mining unit, which is called Alydian Inc. Mr. Vessenes is also chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation, a nonprofit trade group that promotes the virtual currency.

Mr. Vessenes noted in an email on Thursday that CoinLab itself has no mining operations, but “of course we will comply (with the judge’s order) as well as we’re able.” It isn’t clear if Alydian is still generating bitcoin while it is under bankruptcy protection."
legendary
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
November 08, 2013, 10:09:47 AM
#26
Might not be dropping, but it certainly ain't going up right now, not for the last week or so.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 882
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
November 07, 2013, 07:22:02 AM
#25
Since the difficulty is adjusted based on the entire 2016 block period, reducing the hash rate during the last few days would have little effect on the actual adjustment value.  The only thing turning off your miner(s) during the last few days does is to reduce your own income at the lower difficulty - which makes no sense.

This ^^^^^^^

No conspiracy here, just some miners switch to other coins when they are more profitable to mine.

legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
November 07, 2013, 06:44:34 AM
#24
Its funny how the hash rate dropped in the days immediately before the diff. change, and then immediately after the diff. change the hash rate jumps right back to pre-dropping levels. It's more than variance. Someone is  'trying' to game the diff. changes.

From https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty

Quote
The difficulty is adjusted every 2016 blocks based on the time it took to find the previous 2016 blocks. At the desired rate of one block each 10 minutes, 2016 blocks would take exactly two weeks to find. If the previous 2016 blocks took more than two weeks to find, the difficulty is reduced. If they took less than two weeks, the difficulty is increased. The change in difficulty is in proportion to the amount of time over or under two weeks the previous 2016 blocks took to find.

Since the difficulty is adjusted based on the entire 2016 block period, reducing the hash rate during the last few days would have little effect on the actual adjustment value.  The only thing turning off your miner(s) during the last few days does is to reduce your own income at the lower difficulty - which makes no sense.
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 250
November 06, 2013, 09:35:17 PM
#23
Its funny how the hash rate dropped in the days immediately before the diff. change, and then immediately after the diff. change the hash rate jumps right back to pre-dropping levels. It's more than variance. Someone is  'trying' to game the diff. changes.
sr. member
Activity: 297
Merit: 250
November 06, 2013, 01:40:50 AM
#22
Just temporary, it is going up again... Next generation mining equipment being shipped everyday... HashFast <----

the reason for this post is not if or why the network hash is going up. It will and my guess is around 25% for the next diff. The question is where did those 1000T go. They were on the network so they are somewhere. And if you notice they didn't drop all at once, they dripped slowly. Burn test by a manufacturer? ASIC going online and breaking down? BFL datacenter went up in flames? Grin Well, there are no news on any major datacenter fire in the past 2 weeks, at least in the google english news. The only 2 i can find in the past month are the Gigenet and the NSA fires

What I understand is the network hashrate also have luck factored in. I.e. your miners might be doing 50 GH/s. But when you go to your pool it says 30 GH/s - 80 GH/s. If your lucky you might submit more shares and etc....
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
November 05, 2013, 09:11:11 PM
#21
Just temporary, it is going up again... Next generation mining equipment being shipped everyday... HashFast <----

the reason for this post is not if or why the network hash is going up. It will and my guess is around 25% for the next diff. The question is where did those 1000T go. They were on the network so they are somewhere. And if you notice they didn't drop all at once, they dripped slowly. Burn test by a manufacturer? ASIC going online and breaking down? BFL datacenter went up in flames? Grin Well, there are no news on any major datacenter fire in the past 2 weeks, at least in the google english news. The only 2 i can find in the past month are the Gigenet and the NSA fires
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
November 05, 2013, 08:56:15 PM
#20
Just temporary, it is going up again... Next generation mining equipment being shipped everyday... HashFast <----
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
November 05, 2013, 08:28:48 PM
#19
Please remember/note that there is a lot of noise in the hashrate reading.  Also note that the estimated next difficulty is not that accurate right after an adjustment.

The best charts I have seen for this sort of speculation are found here:

http://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

Note the second graph down.  It shows graphically how much the next difficulty estimate varies over each difficulty adjustment cycle.

Also note:

Bitcoin Difficulty: 510,929,738

Estimated Next Difficulty: 656,156,896 (+28.42%)

I believe this to be the best estimate at this time.  
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
November 05, 2013, 08:18:32 PM
#18
If there is a drop in hashing power/miner, the difficulty will decrease and therefore it would be a wise idea to buy hardware.
At this time and age wouldn't it be cost effective for manipulation by a bitcoin hardware seller? What I mean is a organized DDOS in order to make it look like there is less miners, thus people will think it will be easier to mine and will buy hardware?
Then when they shipout the hardware they stop the DDOS.

I hope this is not the case.

That is a pretty intriguing thought.

Or perhaps a trojan, or bot that goes around hacking into mining machines,

either diverting payouts or attempting to permanently damage the board.

That would bring the hashrate down, and the companies wouldn't need

to do a thing, letting human nature take its course.

Realistically, its only a matter of time now.


How many people left their log and pass admin? A certain percentage will.

Hell, I did til just now. Roll Eyes
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
November 05, 2013, 07:32:18 PM
#17
doesn't look like it's dropping anytime soon
next estimate is 755745693

where are you getting that estimate from? that would imply a 50% hash rate raise or close to 1800 Tera hashes, according to what i'm seeing so far the next hash rate will be 513. I know this is not final but i would expect around a 25% increase to 625 million (900 Tera hashes added to the network)
full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 100
November 05, 2013, 06:53:36 PM
#16
doesn't look like it's dropping anytime soon
next estimate is 755745693
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
November 05, 2013, 06:23:03 PM
#15
If there is a drop in hashing power/miner, the difficulty will decrease and therefore it would be a wise idea to buy hardware.
At this time and age wouldn't it be cost effective for manipulation by a bitcoin hardware seller? What I mean is a organized DDOS in order to make it look like there is less miners, thus people will think it will be easier to mine and will buy hardware?
Then when they shipout the hardware they stop the DDOS.

I hope this is not the case.
Pages:
Jump to: