But when it is expected that during an economic crisis, people would pull back on spending on their pets, it turned out the opposite. According to research by Edge by Ascential, the pet industry is forecasted to reach $281 billion by 2023.
I try to summarize some sectors that are vulnerable and resistant to the recession process, by looking at various considerations that support sectors in the US.
These three sectors are relatively large in the US, so the potential for recession is greater, in fact this is a picture of the most recession-prone sectors in various countries.
While the business industry that has resilience during a recession.
Because these three industries are not sensitive to rising interest rates and these industries are needed by many people when the economy is in recession.
Meanwhile, the pet industry did not have a major impact on the occurrence of a recession, because the supply and expenditure of this industry was not directly related to secondary or primary needs. (replaceable)
Furthermore, a recession is associated with a declining domestic product, a negative real economy in two or more quarters and a major slowdown or contraction in economic activity or vice versa.
Animal protection laws: Countries now have written laws that protect pets against maltreatment and suffering. These laws are really enforced in developed countries and not in Africa where pests are exploited.
Including animal protection laws, but in the next comment you said that stray dogs and cats are caught for slaughter.
In some developing countries, dogs and cats are good meat. They are reared for meat and stray dogs or cats are captured and slaughtered. African culture doesn't support keeping animals as pets. Most dogs are reared for hunting or for guiding flocks. This part of the world has some of the best-hunting dogs, that can kill rabbits and bring the meat to the owner without several bites.
Do legal references only apply to pets, but not to wild animals.
This confuses me?
As far as I know the law is used in a general sense, there are no exceptions in its application.
If your assumption is correct, then the person living in the area you mentioned is breaking the law.
Covid-19 Pandemic:
>snip
The area where I live, COVID-19 has started to disappear, activities involving face-to-face meetings are running as usual, although the economic impact has not recovered 100%.
However, it seems that it is no longer in the dangerous category, just waiting for the economic recovery to continue, because people still cannot get out of the economic problems that hit when Covid-19 occurred.