Pages:
Author

Topic: Is the point of view for newbies brutal while for trusted members guys are blind - page 2. (Read 1566 times)

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
@suchmoon so basically if newbies are asking valid questions against " celebrities " of this forum ( you only used these words lol ) then they deserve to be get banned or shut up right ?

You mean to say that only trusted people should raise questions while if a newbie sees something wrong, he should shut his mouth for 5 years unless he becomes legendary, right ?

Newbies can ask valid questions - they are, after all, newbies.

We have an issue with you (Quickseller) making fake throw away accounts to complain. 

If you have an issue, have the balls to post it with your main account, and don't hide.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  Embarrassed

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.
Not quite sure what you are talking about.....but it sounds like it is someone's time of the month  Cheesy

There are plenty of warnings about Lauda going around already, I just find it strange that those who make a hobby out of aggressively negging the not-so-innocent have not yet done so with Lauda. Some even negged the person in my above example who did the exact same thing as Lauda did Cheesy

Wow, a PMS joke... I bow to your wit.

Let me spell it out so you could be sure: you, referred to as "filthy hypocrite" above, as well as the OP of this thread - let's refer to him/her as "filthy spammer" - have not posted neg feedback for Lauda yet you're both advocating for OTHERS to do that. Post your negs, case closed, fuck off (I feel I may be repeating myself here). If you feel that's not enough - create some more sockpuppet accounts, post more negs, you can even network them into trust lists and get Lauda to -9999.
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  Embarrassed

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.
Not quite sure what you are talking about.....but it sounds like it is someone's time of the month  Cheesy

There are plenty of warnings about Lauda going around already, I just find it strange that those who make a hobby out of aggressively negging the not-so-innocent have not yet done so with Lauda. Some even negged the person in my above example who did the exact same thing as Lauda did Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  Embarrassed

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  Embarrassed
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I agree with suchmoon - I don't appreciate it when cowards PM me.  Stop it.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I guess I might as well post it here (and apologies to other recipients of my PM - didn't intend to click "reply all").

Why don't you "behave like a man" yourself and use your real account. Newbie with a hard-on for Lauda, QS, yahoo, or any other forum "celebrity" doesn't inspire any trust so please kindly fuck off and don't PM me. Thank you.

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-the-point-of-view-for-newbies-brutal-while-for-trusted-members-guys-are-blind-1771983

share your views and come on ! behave like a man rather worrying like a girl guys
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
When a user Lauda ( cool meaning in language Hindi actually ) clearly done something that was much more brutal and illegal than what QS did then why Lauda just got 1 -ve while QS has tons of that ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

Any particular reason why such hate with some members or are lauda and 90% of green trust members alt of each other ?

Please define !
Pages:
Jump to: