Topic: Is the whole trust system a joke? LAUDA OWNS IT? - page 2. (Read 922 times)

Some say that I am the CEO of FJ. Others say that I live on the Mars. Without proof, any statements without evidence in any cases would amount to defamation and you know how that is handled. 

Do you mean the same CH that had to break down simple concepts to child's examples for you to understand what a scam was before you cointunued to support it ? I have been browsing your history HugeBlackWoman and for it amusing and pathetic.  


Don't worry about this chump he will support lauda even if he suspects lauda is doing shady shit. he has confessed this before.

This member is a fool and untrustworthy.

Lauda has a special sponsorship deal with FJ he does not go through hhampuz.

Some say he is a part of FJ.

Yes it looks scammy, they know people using that low level place are not likely wanting to give ID.

you get a big win and they flag you for ID hoping you'll leave it there for them.

Avoid it and anything the scammer lauda promotes or offers.


You yourself although you are unaware have supplied evidence that confirms lauda is a lying scammer.

Mods, can you start deleting posts by the lazy users who don't bother to edit walls of text before they add one line of new useless content?  :/

I am really upset and saddened to see that no one is talking why FJ requires Id proof later only when player wins big earlier they don't need it, please read this post for once- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53947114



I don't know what you are talking about but surely I don't know him/her and even if I was one of the tagged accounts does that stops me from putting a genuine point? Why FJ requires ID proof only after someone wins big and how can lauda negative feedback someone just because they have different opinion?

Interesting. That puts a lot of the current happenings into perspective.

Idiots like this spamming their gambling avatars and sigs try to make a joke of it.  They are working their way towards chipmixer and FJ have no doubt regarding their real intentions.

There is concrete evidence to support lauda and a tiny core of other scammers and general toadies control DT and a huge proportion of merit.

Another member asked hhampuz if he was knowingly hiring these types who presented credible evidence that no members attempted to refute. They just gave him mutiple red tags for asking a credible and sensible question.

Theymos stepped in to lend a hand by suggesting it was an alt of the prior whistlblower who demonstrated lauda was clearly and liar and scammer so that they had further excuses to slather more red. Always helpful, but sadly to the scammers and abusers.

Join the guild but don't expect any real help from DT or admin they all have their noses in the chipmixer FJ scampaigns.

They don't like dealing with evidence and irrefutable and independently verifiable events so will run for ignoring or red tags. Pathetic weaels the entire bunch.

"Is the whole trust system a joke?"

No.

"LAUDA OWNS IT?"

Yes, of course. This aspect was clarified long time ago.


Don't understand the reasons for opening this topic 

All you can do is to obey, to bow down in front of the Supreme Leaders of the forum and, in this case, to worship as instructed above

Lauda is a confirmed scammer. He was originally called lauda

You see he is calling dash an instamined scam above. Well you found gold there. That project was originally called xcoin then darkcoin. A scam hunting legend cryptohunter busted him for lying and pushing that same scam when he owned bags of it. For a very long time lauda was pushing that scam and lying to defend it.

LaudaM for months lies claiming he was on the xcoin/dash launch and said he was present and confimes there was no unfair start no premine/ instamine. He was pushing that scam for ages until he unloaded his bags.

Years later when lauda called cryptohunter a liar and would not present evidence crypto Hunter encouraged others to investigate laudas history and specifically his dash pushing and defending.

Find the lauda section and trace it back to his lies he was on dash launch and no premine instamine ...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-the-official-dirty-turds-poll-which-dt-needs-flushing-first-5170789



Lauda gave him red trust for whistle blowing on him, this was backed by him auction scamming friend tman and other complicit scum like yogg and owlcatz.

Theymos is not any better he backs these proven scammers and lists then accuses whistleblowers of being the bad guys.

All the other DT members are scared or complicit. Happy so long as they get to spam chipmixer and other scampaigns.

I don't trust any of these DT or even Theymos now that removed laudas exclusion. All either scammers or complicit with them. Theymos has clear and undeniable evidence of laudas scamming and using tags to silence those that present the truth about him and he still will not blacklist him. This looks very dubious after all of this time. I mean when the warden of this forum suddenly creates a method to reintroduce a bunch of proven scammers previously kicked out of DT and painted red back in to DT glowing green and fully entrenched. Then says proven scamming, extortion, shady escrowing and using the trust system to red tag whistle blowers is just sub optimal. Then you start till wonder what is going on behind the scenes.

The proof is right there in your post. He is a liar and scammer. Lauda and DT are rotten. The evidence against lauda is concrete, same for DT they are complicit. The evidence against Theymos continues to build and is heading into a very negative direction. There is no conceivable reason why Theymos would remove the lauda exclude or not ban that filthy piece of scamming dirt.

Fortunejack and chipmixer sponsor the most shady people on this forum. Theymos has developed the most shady looking governance system possible. It removes all accountability and rewards and entrenched abuse and manipulation, while as you clearly note crushes free speech. You speak up you get a red tag and merit starvation.

What a terrible environment Theymos has created so far.


Join the guild started by Tecshare on meta board. The lists are guides but over time The guild will have The mass of numbers to cause the scamming and complicit DT abusers a lot of problems.

Its usually the case, must tagged for having shady alt account apart from savetheFORUM account.

“Yes”—or at least, feel free to believe that if it makes you feel better.  Any other stupid questions?

Same here (though not Vod so much), and although I wish we were all on the same page about everything, we all know that is never going to happen.  The conflict is what keeps the forum balanced--if you can believe that--because if all the "powerful" personalities here had the same opinions, bitcointalk would be like an oligarchy or some such thing.  There needs to be dissent, and I don't think OP should have to fear getting tagged because he's speaking out against Lauda or anyone else.  I think a lot of us agree that this wouldn't be an appropriate use of the trust system, and hopefully a tag like that would be countered.

Definitely.  I'm just hoping OP isn't an alt of cryptohunter/TOAA, because in that case it would be hard for me to take any of this seriously.  The writing style and length are similar, but I can't be sure.  OP seems a bit more level-headed than CH.

There was no any grudge against DT. It appeared when TMAN tagged me just for fun, and the some DT1 has supported it.

Newbie accounts that appear to know a lot about the forum and have a grudge against DT usually means they are a sockpuppet of a tagged older account.

Since, according to you, nobody can oppose me my advice to you it to just start with the following:

I have got another old account but It became interesting for me to communicate as newbie. How to meet newcomers to this forum?
It turns out that respected community members are ready to pounce like a pack of dogs.
When TMAN is tagged me, I was hoping to find support here. I was naive.

respect for the good replies, actually felt I crossed the line after you replied. But why do you promote a bad service for a few cents man?

I think the immediate accusatory remarks show signs of paranoia. It's understandable to feel indignant and trapped by the partisan trust system but I think it's also important to note that just because someone disagrees with you, they are not immediately attributable to the side you're directly opposing.

Am I immediately considered non-neutral simply because I appear to be defending Lauda? In that case, would your definition of neutrality be "unfavorable towards Lauda"?

I wouldn't use the word know since the only way for you to really know is if you yourself were Lauda.

---

(addendum edited since you revised your post)

I have opposed Lauda, yes. There are a number of cases in which I've literally countered a rating from Lauda. Other forum members of which I've directly opposed include Vod, OgNasty, TECSHARE, etc... the list goes on.

---

EDIT: (in relation to subsequent post)

Responded via PM.

I don't want to talk with someone who advertises a scam promotion service for some cents (because no innocent person would need to mix their coins, will they?)

This is your main account?
You didn't want to be tagged when you created a thread titled "DT tag me more please!"?
This is a very confusing situation.

haha. Nice joke man!
What do you think about this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53608691