Is there a Bitcoin Dice Simulator to test if a strategy works - page 2.

Zadicar

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1020

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Quote from: bamboylee on March 09, 2017, 11:58:10 AM

Quote from: maroondragon on March 09, 2017, 11:16:04 AM

snip
is not a Martingale

You said it is not a martingale but it is martingale. You increase your betsize by 11.2% every time you lose and reset it to 10 if you win. That is no different to martingale, only modified a bit. This is bound to lose like any other martingale there is.

Quote

var loseMultiplier = .112;

betSize += (betSize * loseMultiplier);

Correct,its contradicting related to his statement and it's clear that this method considered as martingale.just a piece of advice this method might work on your side but doesn't mean it would work for all. Looking for a dice simulator site might be hard since I can't find one.

maroondragon

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: peter0425 on March 09, 2017, 11:43:08 AM

Just create you own simulator program so that you can see if your strategy works. I don't know if there's a site that you can test your strategy, but can you try it will free faucet? Hmmm... You may want to try yolodice I think they have a options to try their on-line dice game but I don't know how much bankroll you needed. Wink

. Goodluck to your strategy and hope you win

Thanks for your reply. There are a couple of things to keep in mind here.

* You need an extremely large bankroll for this strategy, which most people do not have. I would estimate around 100 BTC. You could try it with a lower bankroll, but then your odds significantly go down, as mine did. I had a balance of only 0.2 BTC and made only 0.00000100 bets, which is 10 times the comfort zone.
* With faucets, you have an extremely low balance, meaning most if not all strategies are rendered useless.
* The purpose of this strategy is to feel comfortable running bets on autopilot. That means you can just leave the program running all day. That's why I don't mind small bets. Around 10 satoshi per second might not seem like much, but it could add up.
* My programming skills are really bad. There's no way I could write a program like this.

bamboylee

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 504

Quote from: maroondragon on March 09, 2017, 11:16:04 AM

snip
is not a Martingale

You said it is not a martingale but it is martingale. You increase your betsize by 11.2% every time you lose and reset it to 10 if you win. That is no different to martingale, only modified a bit. This is bound to lose like any other martingale there is.

Quote

var loseMultiplier = .112;

betSize += (betSize * loseMultiplier);

dustboy

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 517

There was a site called by monodice, a site to practice your strategy on a dice game but I'm not sure if the site is still alive or not. Even if the site is alive but I dont think that the result of the practice with the strategy will be the same when you play it in real mode.
Dice is a matter of luck game, you can beat the house by strategies.

peter0425

sr. member

Activity: 2618

Merit: 439

Just create you own simulator program so that you can see if your strategy works. I don't know if there's a site that you can test your strategy, but can you try it will free faucet? Hmmm... You may want to try yolodice I think they have a options to try their on-line dice game but I don't know how much bankroll you needed. Wink

. Goodluck to your strategy and hope you win

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: maroondragon on March 09, 2017, 11:16:04 AM

I came up with a new strategy that I think will win over the course of 1 Billion rolls. I found out that Wizard of Odds used to offer such a challenge for other casino games such as Roulette and Blackjack.

The system requires a large balance and very small bet amounts and is not a Martingale. Essentially, this is a strategy that is perfect for automated betting. Whenever I've tried a similar version, given a fair balance I've never lost. However, I also used larger bets and had a smaller bankroll than this strategy requires.

I found a similar site at satoshidicebreaker, but the unit spread is too small, and only allows you to bet at 50%.

Sure, there's a chance this will lose in a session, but I think the odds are astronomically low. Like way lower than .505²⁴.

I'm interested if there is a website that lets you test this theory, like where you can input a starting balance, a bet size, and a winning percentage.

The code would look something like this

Code:

    var balance = 1000000000;
    var bets = 0;
    var betSize = 10;
    var loseMultiplier = .112;
    var multiplier = .3;
    
    while (balance > 0) {
        if (result == "win") {
            balance += betSize;
            betSize = 10;
        } 
        else {
            betSize += (betSize * loseMultiplier);
            balance -= betSize;
        }
        bets++;
    }

    console.log("You have lasted " + bets + " bets");

I don’t know of any but if you can code then why not create the code to test your method yourself? Since I find it difficult to believe that even if a site existed where you could test your method I doubt they are going to allow you to conduct a billion rolls just to test your method.

maroondragon

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

I came up with a new strategy that I think will win over the course of 1 Billion rolls. I found out that Wizard of Odds used to offer such a challenge for other casino games such as Roulette and Blackjack.

The system requires a large balance and very small bet amounts and is not a Martingale. Essentially, this is a strategy that is perfect for automated betting. Whenever I've tried a similar version, given a fair balance I've never lost. However, I also used larger bets and had a smaller bankroll than this strategy requires.

I found a similar site at satoshidicebreaker, but the unit spread is too small, and only allows you to bet at 50%.

Sure, there's a chance this will lose in a session, but I think the odds are astronomically low. Like way lower than .505²⁴.

I'm interested if there is a website that lets you test this theory, like where you can input a starting balance, a bet size, and a winning percentage.

Here's something I came up with in JavaScript

Code:

var balance = 1000000000;
var bets = 0;
var betSize = 10;
var loseMultiplier = .112;
var winPercent = .10;
    
while (balance > 0) {
    var result = Math.random() >= 0.9 : "win" : "loss";
    if (result == "win") {
        balance += betSize;
        betSize = 10;
    } 
    else {
        betSize += (betSize * loseMultiplier);
        balance -= betSize;
    }
    bets++;
}

document.getElementById("bets").innerHTML = "You have lasted " + bets + " bets";

Topic: Is there a Bitcoin Dice Simulator to test if a strategy works - page 2. (Read 1342 times)