There is correlation between volatility and liquidity in Bitcoin. Liquidity that Bitcoin enjoys is based on it Volatility and the more volatile it comes the more you can turn to cash
For there to be liquidity there must be volatility thay would trigger the market to be moving in a to and fro manner. Continue volatility what normally lead to liquidity in the market so there is no way liquidity can exist without the market up and down movement. Once we understand the manners which volatility works, we are going to know that we don't have to stress ourselves on how a project is going to create liquidity. Bitcoin has it way of generating liquidity through the law of demand and supply. This law had different projects to create liquidity for their tokens to skyrocket to the moon. 
Topic: Is there a correlation between liquidity and volatility? (Read 493 times)
All cryptocurrencies have volatility. Bitcoin also has volatility. But that's less than altcoins. But Bitcoin's liquidity is more than all other coins. Because of Bitcoin's liquidity, it is easy to sell, while it is easy to convert to cash. Its liquidity is more than other alt coins. It is very reliable coin and its transaction is also easy. But its volatility is lower than other coins but it exists.
Quote
Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
NO, i don't think so. High liquidity means there is a large number of buyers and sellers in the market, making it easy to execute trades.So high liquidity can sometimes be associated with lower volatility
As we understand, liquidity refers to the rate at which you can easily sell an asset or investment and convert it to cash (this is the best way I understand it). Some investments include stocks, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, real estate, high-end wristwatches, and more. Bitcoin is highly liquid because at any time of the day, year, or at any place I am, I can easily sell my Bitcoin for cash. However, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are also very volatile compared to other assets or investments. Yes, they are liquid but not necessarily non-volatile. Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
Liquidity doesn't limit to sell or convert assets, it also means ways to have quick access to cash but in crypto, you are right about that, enough liquidity means you can easily sell or convert to cash without having any form of difficulty in doing it.
I think liquidity of bitcoin is subjective to people, the fact that I have 1 bitcoin and I can be able to sell easily doesn't mean that Micheal Saylor can do that because as of today, he has about 158k bitcoin under his holding and if today he moves that bitcoin from one wallet to another, people are going to panic and will want to sell all their own because they will think that he is about sell everything and cashout from his investment and that alone can tank the price for that influence with huge volatility. Elon Musk also did sell some of part of their bitcoin reserve because of same liquidity challenges.
I think Bitcoin is huge but let's keep bringing more and more investors and build large empire of investment, a time will come that we will not care about this liquidity again because it will be available more than enough and bitcoin volatility will be low by that time.
Generally, the less liquidity, the higher the volatility. Why does this happen? Buying or selling even a small volume with low liquidity can significantly affect the price of a product. And if you have a large amount of coins or shares, it will be extremely difficult to sell them at an acceptable price
Quote
Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
Well yes of course it's the supply and demand that makes it volatile. If there is no flow of buying and selling it means it also has no volatility. Liquidity is very important in an asset because aside from executing buy and sell it also makes the said asset alive. Centralized assets is also different and might contradict the process because they have high liquidity but is stable compared to decentralized assets. 
Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
You are very correct about that. The higher the liquidity the higher the volatility. Because the money investors pump in bitcoin that made bitcoin maintain it's prestige. Bitcoin can never be volatile if people do not invest in it. And I discover that there is no special features that made bitcoin unique from other altcoin rather than the money invested on it. If eve body pull out there money from bitcoin will it still remain bitcoin? Because our people said a monkey can only be smart when it jump from tree to tree when the the tree is near to each other. And I think that is the formula holding bitcoin. That is why we are always have different conversations where set always say hodl for long because by everyone holding bitcoin it's making it relatively scarece and adding more liquidity to it because we are gradually forming a strong chain and a large number of bitcoin community. And that will enhance or speed up bitcoin growth. And meeting up to our expectations on bitcoin price. 
I do agree that liquidity matters a lot and low ones could cause a lot of issues without a doubt, volatility is nice when trading but sudden movements are not nice. I get that dropping %5 one day and then going up %3 the next day type of things are fine for trading, and should be important, but that doesn't mean that we are going to end up with a result like that easily, its going to be a trouble one way or another. Because the low ones could have %40+ drop one day and %200 increase another, that's not acceptable. So all I think is that volatility is good just a bit. Its like vaccines, you make the body sick just tiny bit enough to get it used to it so that when it gets sick for real it knows what to do and ready.
Volatility can be useful for traders, but you need to know how to take advantage of it. If you are trading some altcoin that you see potential for growth, then you can take advantage of this, but I would only dare to do this in a bear market, so that if it falls further, I have hope that it will rise again in a bull market. In any case, volatility is what attracts traders to the crypto market.And liquidity is important for large players who need to sell large volumes quickly, this especially applies to top coins, because large volumes on low-liquidity coins can greatly affect their price.
It's interesting that some people here tend to agree that higher liquidity means higher volatility. I wanted to write that there's no correlation because things can vary depending on an asset, and an asset can have low liquidity but be volatile because even small changes make a big impact, or, conversely, something like gold can be relatively stable but have very high liquidity. But then I also came across an academic article that says that there's actually a significant inverse correlation between liquidity and volatility. So the higher liquidity, the lower volatility and vice versa.
There is correlation between volatility and liquidity in Bitcoin. Liquidity that Bitcoin enjoys is based on it Volatility and the more volatile it comes the more you can turn to cash
As we understand, liquidity refers to the rate at which you can easily sell an asset or investment and convert it to cash (this is the best way I understand it). Some investments include stocks, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, real estate, high-end wristwatches, and more. Bitcoin is highly liquid because at any time of the day, year, or at any place I am, I can easily sell my Bitcoin for cash. However, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are also very volatile compared to other assets or investments. Yes, they are liquid but not necessarily non-volatile. Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
No, I would argue against high liquidity meaning high volatility. High liquidity means that there is a large number of buy or sell counterparts that would fill my order. It's not only about the number of traders, but also the quantity of traders. It could be that there are a lot of small buy or sell orders that would be filled by one single large trade and taking out all the liquidity from the market. Just because we can trade small amounts of cryptos all the time doesn't mean the exchange could handle a large order as well. Volatility comes into play when there are news coming out that have a big impact on the markets or economy. For example, the slow down of central banks to keep increasing rates means that risky assets become more attractive anymore. Many investors already expect rates to fall again next year to support the economy. When bonds and savings accounts don't offer interest rates anymore, investors will go back into stocks and cryptos. A constant rise or drop in prices doesn't mean high volatility, that comes from people taking profit and tryinh to get out of the market. Liquidity is people's willingness to trade and volatility is uncertainty and short term noise in the market. Liquidity means there are a lot of buyers and sellers, not buying and selling at the moment, those people put out orders and the trader comes in and trades based on that, when someone puts orders that is not traded, they create liquidity, when someone comes in and trades on that, then it becomes volatility.
As we understand, liquidity refers to the rate at which you can easily sell an asset or investment and convert it to cash (this is the best way I understand it). Some investments include stocks, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, real estate, high-end wristwatches, and more. Bitcoin is highly liquid because at any time of the day, year, or at any place I am, I can easily sell my Bitcoin for cash. However, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are also very volatile compared to other assets or investments. Yes, they are liquid but not necessarily non-volatile. Can I, therefore, conclude that the higher the liquidity of an asset, the higher its volatility?
No, I would argue against high liquidity meaning high volatility. High liquidity means that there is a large number of buy or sell counterparts that would fill my order. It's not only about the number of traders, but also the quantity of traders. It could be that there are a lot of small buy or sell orders that would be filled by one single large trade and taking out all the liquidity from the market. Just because we can trade small amounts of cryptos all the time doesn't mean the exchange could handle a large order as well. Volatility comes into play when there are news coming out that have a big impact on the markets or economy. For example, the slow down of central banks to keep increasing rates means that risky assets become more attractive anymore. Many investors already expect rates to fall again next year to support the economy. When bonds and savings accounts don't offer interest rates anymore, investors will go back into stocks and cryptos. A constant rise or drop in prices doesn't mean high volatility, that comes from people taking profit and tryinh to get out of the market. Liquidity is people's willingness to trade and volatility is uncertainty and short term noise in the market.
but we should also see that many of big investors, institutional investors, even pension fund are investing heavily in bitcoin that I think it will be the cause of stabilization of volatilty of bitcoin in the future.
If they just buy and hold Bitcoin, it won't increase stability, because speculators will still control the price. To have lower volatility we need more traders that will create more market depth - they should put buy and sell orders so that moving the price by 5% or 10% would require billions of dollars.
Another thing that we should look at is high leverage trading and derivatives - it could be that it is creating volatility on the spot market by influencing them.
I understand li liquidity to be the State of time an investor is stipulated to generate incomes through a trading effort of his assets while volatility is the possibilities of an Investors inability to predict an intime (future) ratios of the values rates of an assets due to the accessible flexibilities to fluctuations of assets demands.
You were right when you said that liquidity is about how quickly you can turn assets into cash. Stocks, cryptocurrencies, and even those fancy watches are all caught up in this storm. The catch is that liquidity doesn't always mean instability is welcome. Think of it like a crowded market; lots of buyers and sellers make for smooth transactions (high liquidity), but does it necessarily mean prices will swing wildly (high volatility)? Not really! Bitcoin is definitely a roller coaster, but take a look at large-cap stocks. They're liquid, but they tend to be more safe than your volatile cryptos. Because there are always buyers and sellers, high liquidity can mean more steadiness. It's like a safety net against wild price swings
Volatility isn't just about liquidity; it's about uncertainty, news, market sentiment - a whole cauldron of factors! Look at real estate. It's not as changeable as other things, but it can change a lot, right? It has to do with the situation and the setting. Can you now say that more liquidity means more volatility? It's not that simple black and white
Volatility isn't just about liquidity; it's about uncertainty, news, market sentiment - a whole cauldron of factors! Look at real estate. It's not as changeable as other things, but it can change a lot, right? It has to do with the situation and the setting. Can you now say that more liquidity means more volatility? It's not that simple black and white
If we are talking about crypto markets, you correctly said that, the lower the liquidity, the easier to impact in prices by buying or selling smaller quantities. You only have to watch those small caps that value less than a cent and in a few days go like x100 (and viceversa). The problem is that when you try to liquidate you may be dumping the price against your own interest: you sell for a good price the first units but very cheap the last ones.
Take for example MODEX: ask was at less than 1 cent in Bittrex (btw, the exchange recently announced that they are closing, so hurry up and withdraw!!) like two months ago, but yesterday $0.23. Easy maths, it went more than 23x in two months. And in 2021 did the same, and then dumped that hard, too. This proce action is inconceivable for high caps.
Take for example MODEX: ask was at less than 1 cent in Bittrex (btw, the exchange recently announced that they are closing, so hurry up and withdraw!!) like two months ago, but yesterday $0.23. Easy maths, it went more than 23x in two months. And in 2021 did the same, and then dumped that hard, too. This proce action is inconceivable for high caps.
Yes, there is an increase in liquidity and a decrease in volatility. Aside from this, there is also a reduction in the influence of its price. It can also help to level out price fluctuation and reduce volatility. I'm referring to a positive correlation.
Whereas negative correlation is the inverse of positive correlation in terms of liquidity and volatility, there is also a disruption in the market, such as the negative news that we will experience, which is news that has a brief increase in the volatility of its price in the market.
Whereas negative correlation is the inverse of positive correlation in terms of liquidity and volatility, there is also a disruption in the market, such as the negative news that we will experience, which is news that has a brief increase in the volatility of its price in the market.
I doubt that more liquidity can fix Bitcoin's volatility, because Bitcoin's volatility comes from the lack of fundamentals that are easy to calculate.
I have my opinion that I think bitcoin volatility strongly correlate with its market capitalization, i can roughly think that its the same as gold, but the bitcoin market capitalization is still lower than gold by significant margin but seeing if bitcoin gonna be linearly growing from here on it might come as close as gold and also might have similar volatility in the future.added with the fact that cryptocurrency market right now is getting bigger and bigger, but still can't deny the fact that there might be some other factors such as the general majority of investors of bitcoin that are really like to speculate while that on its own is not really a problem might be the cause of the increased volatility compared to the other investment instruments.
but we should also see that many of big investors, institutional investors, even pension fund are investing heavily in bitcoin that I think it will be the cause of stabilization of volatilty of bitcoin in the future.
I doubt that more liquidity can fix Bitcoin's volatility, because Bitcoin's volatility comes from the lack of fundamentals that are easy to calculate. Bitcoin's value is just a guess, a feeling, that's why it changes so often. If a stock of some company randomly jumped or crashed by 30%, a lot of market players would take the opportunity to counter such irrational movement. But with Bitcoin no one really knows if it's oversold or overbought.
So higher liquidity doesn't change much, it would just mean more players playing the guessing game.
So higher liquidity doesn't change much, it would just mean more players playing the guessing game.
Liquidity can happen if anyone investor or trader decides to do so for maybe FOMO or volatility of market season or for good investment reasons.
Volatility is thus a factor that could effect liquidity of assets for investors. It is not in a direct correlation to liquidity.
Even in times when the market is volatile, an investor or trader can choose to still HoDL and wait it out, possibly they still got plans or want it to rise more than it was, before considering liquidation.
Volatility is thus a factor that could effect liquidity of assets for investors. It is not in a direct correlation to liquidity.
Even in times when the market is volatile, an investor or trader can choose to still HoDL and wait it out, possibly they still got plans or want it to rise more than it was, before considering liquidation.
Jump to: