Pages:
Author

Topic: Is there a site showing all the different Bitcoin implemenations? (Read 1635 times)

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
i also see it like that, because undecided does not make sense, if they do not decide to go with the new limit, then they are basically saying "we stay with the current limit", since there is no deadline here, they can potentially stay "undecided" forever

which is utterly no-sense

now your speculating.. you just dont know their intentions. so best to treat them as undecided. im not saying they want 2mb or they want segwit.. there is just lack of proof either way. so obviously best to take them out of the equation until its obvious..(by them updating)


so my mindset is

by not keeping up to date. they are not voting for 2mb and they are equally not voting for segwit.. they are just undecided. you cant assume they want segwit, you cant assume they want 2mb

but we can assume that they want to remain with 1mb, if no decision is made it mean that they like to stay in the current situation, until they change their mind, their decision is already settled, which is again 1mb

basically they are voting indirectly, the 1mb limit, by remaining undecided, there is no "no voting" ever, you either vote something or something else, that's my point

lol and in april. when segwit is a thing.. you will switch mindsets. and say, well they havnt voted for segwit. but it doesnt matter lets put them as undecided..

cant have it both ways.. so best to side line that crowd until its obvious what they want.. anything else is just speculation

i'll simply say that they are now with segwit or with classic or whatever, but for now they are with 1mb limit, this because there is no deadline, it's all about personal consensus

if there was a deadline then the whole argument about being undecided would make more sense
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
i also see it like that, because undecided does not make sense, if they do not decide to go with the new limit, then they are basically saying "we stay with the current limit", since there is no deadline here, they can potentially stay "undecided" forever

which is utterly no-sense

now your speculating.. you just dont know their intentions. so best to treat them as undecided. im not saying they want 2mb or they want segwit.. there is just lack of proof either way. so obviously best to take them out of the equation until its obvious..(by them updating)


so my mindset is

by not keeping up to date. they are not voting for 2mb and they are equally not voting for segwit.. they are just undecided. you cant assume they want segwit, you cant assume they want 2mb

but we can assume that they want to remain with 1mb, if no decision is made it mean that they like to stay in the current situation, until they change their mind, their decision is already settled, which is again 1mb

basically they are voting indirectly, the 1mb limit, by remaining undecided, there is no "no voting" ever, you either vote something or something else, that's my point

lol and in april. when segwit is a thing.. you will switch mindsets. and say, well they havnt voted for segwit. but it doesnt matter lets put them as undecided..

cant have it both ways.. so best to side line that crowd until its obvious what they want.. anything else is just speculation
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
i also see it like that, because undecided does not make sense, if they do not decide to go with the new limit, then they are basically saying "we stay with the current limit", since there is no deadline here, they can potentially stay "undecided" forever

which is utterly no-sense

now your speculating.. you just dont know their intentions. so best to treat them as undecided. im not saying they want 2mb or they want segwit.. there is just lack of proof either way. so obviously best to take them out of the equation until its obvious..(by them updating)


so my mindset is

by not keeping up to date. they are not voting for 2mb and they are equally not voting for segwit.. they are just undecided. you cant assume they want segwit, you cant assume they want 2mb

but we can assume that they want to remain with 1mb, if no decision is made it mean that they like to stay in the current situation, until they change their mind, their decision is already settled, which is again 1mb

basically they are voting indirectly, the 1mb limit, by remaining undecided, there is no "no voting" ever, you either vote something or something else, that's my point
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
i also see it like that, because undecided does not make sense, if they do not decide to go with the new limit, then they are basically saying "we stay with the current limit", since there is no deadline here, they can potentially stay "undecided" forever

which is utterly no-sense

now your speculating.. you just dont know their intentions. so best to treat them as undecided. im not saying they want 2mb or they want segwit.. there is just lack of proof either way. so obviously best to take them out of the equation until its obvious..(by them updating)


so my mindset is

by not keeping up to date. they are not voting for 2mb and they are equally not voting for segwit.. they are just undecided. you cant assume they want segwit, you cant assume they want 2mb
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
remember nodes over a year old cannot be automatically classed as desiring 1mb.. they have not shown any direction since the debate has begun, so best to leave them outside in a undecided category

Of course they can. They're enforcing the 1MB limit. If their operators didn't desire to enforce the consensus rules, they wouldn't run a node. And where the hell do you get a year, anyway? You just constantly make up the rules as you go along.

Anyway, this is just meaningless blathering. The fact is, those nodes are enforcing a 1MB limit. So if a miner publishes > 1MB blocks, they'll just fork them off. You can call them "undecided" all you want, but it's not very accurate. They are by definition decided: anything above 1MB is invalid.

i also see it like that, because undecided does not make sense, if they do not decide to go with the new limit, then they are basically saying "we stay with the current limit", since there is no deadline here, they can potentially stay "undecided" forever

which is utterly no-sense
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
Pure propaganda site to boost alternative implementations to Bitcoin Core. If you want a true reflection of all the nodes, rather browse to

 https://coin.dance/nodes .... They not shy to show who the King of the Hill is.  Grin ..... It is actually a joke, that these people are pointing fingers at

other people for censoring information and then they do the same thing.  Grin Grin Grin
sr. member
Activity: 400
Merit: 250
remember nodes over a year old cannot be automatically classed as desiring 1mb.. they have not shown any direction since the debate has begun, so best to leave them outside in a undecided category

Of course they can. They're enforcing the 1MB limit. If their operators didn't desire to enforce the consensus rules, they wouldn't run a node. And where the hell do you get a year, anyway? You just constantly make up the rules as you go along.

Anyway, this is just meaningless blathering. The fact is, those nodes are enforcing a 1MB limit. So if a miner publishes > 1MB blocks, they'll just fork them off. You can call them "undecided" all you want, but it's not very accurate. They are by definition decided: anything above 1MB is invalid.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
nodecounter and other sites have wrongly clumped things together when they done the 1mb vs 2mb.. so here is a fairer overview



remember nodes over a year old cannot be automatically classed as desiring 1mb.. they have not shown any direction since the debate has begun, so best to leave them outside in a undecided category
copper member
Activity: 6
Merit: 1
Might have been another update, but they link 32/64-bit windows/linux, osx and the source code same as with all other implementations, besides unlimited, because they apparently lack a osx version.
It would make sense to provide better information since that is the purpose of the website.

Well as you said its pretty obvious that they have a specific agenda or stance towards the different implementations.

IMHO a log scale would be nice, because you can hardly see the other implementations besides core.
Yes. Even though the colors help with that, the others are barely visible. It would also be nice to know which version are the users running though.

The pie chart is handy for that, but it lacks the development over time.

Log charts are now present on https://coin.dance/nodes/all.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
This change made sense... The website ended up not being about counting XT nodes only Cheesy Pretty interesting visual overhaul, much easier to navigate now
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
Screw nodes. Let's see blocks mined. That's the vote that really counts.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Might have been another update, but they link 32/64-bit windows/linux, osx and the source code same as with all other implementations, besides unlimited, because they apparently lack a osx version.
It would make sense to provide better information since that is the purpose of the website.

Well as you said its pretty obvious that they have a specific agenda or stance towards the different implementations.

IMHO a log scale would be nice, because you can hardly see the other implementations besides core.
Yes. Even though the colors help with that, the others are barely visible. It would also be nice to know which version are the users running though.

The pie chart is handy for that, but it lacks the development over time.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
Might have been another update, but they link 32/64-bit windows/linux, osx and the source code same as with all other implementations, besides unlimited, because they apparently lack a osx version.
It would make sense to provide better information since that is the purpose of the website.

IMHO a log scale would be nice, because you can hardly see the other implementations besides core.
Yes. Even though the colors help with that, the others are barely visible. It would also be nice to know which version are the users running though.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
There's only a single link related to the main implementation. If it was the other way around we would never hear the end of: "censorship, bias, manipulation, etc.". These things are pretty obvious if you pay enough attention.

Might have been another update, but they link 32/64-bit windows/linux, osx and the source code same as with all other implementations, besides unlimited, because they apparently lack a osx version.

IMHO a log scale would be nice, because you can hardly see the other implementations besides core.

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
How come bitcoin.org, bitcointalk, bitcoincore.org, r/bitcoin is censored from the site?
It's simple actually. The website itself is biased while appearing that it is not. You could just as easily claim that they are censoring those 4 by not including them just as people complained about Coinbase and Bitcoin.org. Let's also not forget that this thread was made in the wrong section.

That there's such an obvious anti-Core bias does not inspire much confidence in your data, colinistheman.
Correct.

Two things:
NodeCounter.com does show Core now.
There's only a single link related to the main implementation. If it was the other way around we would never hear the end of: "censorship, bias, manipulation, etc.". These things are pretty obvious if you pay enough attention.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1016
It gives a nice overview indeed. It does seem that core is still the way most people want to go.

Are these really all the nodes? Only 6.5k or so left? Lets hope some alternative ways if running a node become available soon.

Yes pretty sad right?!Although other sites show the count around 5600-5800 nodes.
That's why it is important to not decrease even more.

https://bitnodes.21.co/

https://bitnodes.21.co/dashboard/?days=365
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
so basically there is no support, minus for core

then those that were saaying miners are for classic were indeed wrong, based on this graph
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Lots of interesting graphs and charts.

NodeCounter.com

How come bitcoin.org, bitcointalk, bitcoincore.org, r/bitcoin is censored from the site?

N.Korea does not deserve promotion.

Clever new way to get around Godwin. Wink

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1004
Lots of interesting graphs and charts.

NodeCounter.com

How come bitcoin.org, bitcointalk, bitcoincore.org, r/bitcoin is censored from the site?

N.Korea does not deserve promotion.
Pages:
Jump to: