Pages:
Author

Topic: Is There a Way for Craig to Prove that He is Not Faketoshi ? (Read 340 times)

hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 524
There is a way but he won't use it because he IS faketoshi. Cheesy

That way is to sign genesis coins or move them. He won't do any of it because he's an imposter and most people with IQ higher than that of a rusty nail know it.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 625

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

We have seen on how many dramas that he do tend to create.The public just need for him to move  funds on a certain wallet that believes been owned by Satoshi itself
and with that alone then its already an enough evidence that hes the real one but instead CW do give out inconsistencies of his claims and make him look rather a crazy man
Until now it havent been prove out that hes Satoshi.
sr. member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 368
Craig Wright is just an identity theft that's all.

Enough of this thread about CW because it's getting annoying almost everyday when I read and see his name somewhere else on the internet. If I have a filter of name to show in my internet I would have filtered his complete name but sadly I don't have and I don't bother. Just stop this already because almost everyone knows how to really prove if he was really the real Satoshi but dad to say he ain't.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023
For anyone be it X Y or Z to prove that he or she created bitcoin then can prove that by having the access to the bitcoin addresses Satoshi had and if you are the real person behind the magical development of a new market then he or she is able to provide those details and prove to the entire world. It is a simple job and if Satoshi wants to prove that he knows he can do that easily.
sr. member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 305
Duelbits - $100k Bonus/week
There are too many specific ways to prove that he is the real satoshi but the fact he is lying into us.
He was trying to expose his name and make his own cryptocurrency and trying to replace bitcoin to his own BSV that has a fake volume and obviously manipulated with someone else. If he can post with himself here in the forum using the satoshi account I will believe him and invest BSV as much as I can.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1018


The first step to prove he is not faketoshi is to provide a sign message. Everyone knew there should be a sign message, he is aware of that as well.
CW is not doing any role to make noise for Bitcoin market but he act for his own forked coin BSV.  He even wants to destroy BTC and spread that BTC isn't what is was and his BSV is the real like Ver's claim.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1561
CLEAN non GPL infringing code made in Rust lang

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

It is very simple. He can post as satoshi. So we will follow him after that.

No, he/she/they can't login before the admin unlocks the account, and he won't do that unless he gets proof, probably the signing everyone demands at the very least...

Of course Craig has failed to provide such a thing.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 276
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

to prove that he is a true satoshi in my opinion is simple, he only needs to prove by showing the original private key satoshi nakamoto, and if craig wright does have a private key then he must be able to also make transactions with that private key or sign cryptographic messages using a private key that the same so everyone can be sure that he is not a fake Satoshi. like Charlie Lee did when he proved that he was the creator of Litecoin.

but he did show some private keys on the past or not yet  ? if not  , then he isnt really the real satoshi that we are looking for    . the op is a fan of craig because he wish that craig was the real one   . craig make a lot of noise about bitcoin  ? but i think most of those noise were negative   . thats why there are some people that hates craig    . it really does matter if he will be satoshi or not due to his behavior but the real satoshi could be a good guy , that is for sure .
Still not. Not even a single evidence have been provided by him since the time he claimed to be satoshi nakamoto.

I think so, he might be one of the believers of CW, but it doesn't matter since CW already proven as a liar so many times. What CW's talks was just nonsense, all his prediction is far from reality and he is doing this to increase the popularity of his own coin.
sr. member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 321
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

It is very simple. He can post as satoshi. So we will follow him after that.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1335
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
There are many ways but he was never able to produce a single piece of evidence.
The first strange thing about Craig is hy did he wait years to reveal himself and start claiming that he's Satoshi. If I'm not wrong Kleiman died in 2013 and in 2015 Wright started his "I'm Satoshi" campaign. Why wait so many years if it's really your project.
I think he smelled money and decided to scam everyone and claim what was unclaimed and make money on it. He begun to collect patents but nobody cared and suing everyone but now he got sued and they will bankrupt him.

If he had access to Satoshi's coins he'd have sold them years ago.



full member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 122

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

to prove that he is a true satoshi in my opinion is simple, he only needs to prove by showing the original private key satoshi nakamoto, and if craig wright does have a private key then he must be able to also make transactions with that private key or sign cryptographic messages using a private key that the same so everyone can be sure that he is not a fake Satoshi. like Charlie Lee did when he proved that he was the creator of Litecoin.

but he did show some private keys on the past or not yet  ? if not  , then he isnt really the real satoshi that we are looking for    . the op is a fan of craig because he wish that craig was the real one   . craig make a lot of noise about bitcoin  ? but i think most of those noise were negative   . thats why there are some people that hates craig    . it really does matter if he will be satoshi or not due to his behavior but the real satoshi could be a good guy , that is for sure .
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1385
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.
I don't think it's possible to ultimately prove it. But some things could be done.
1. Signing a message and accessing Satoshi's coins.
2. Proving the locations he and Satoshi's Bitcointalk account had.
3. Explaining things only the creator could explain (this one is hard because it's hard to determine whether there is such a thing).
I don't think he'll ever do that, regardless of whether he is an impostor or not. If he's an impostor, he'd be ruined, and if he's not, he might still lose popularity after the intrigue is over as well as face charges for tax evasion, illegal financial operations or something like that.
legendary
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1198
Bons.io Telegram Casino
There is really no shortcut that he can do but to get access to the wallet that was locked by the real Nakamoto, it was and it still is the demand of the community, this has been dragging for so long, so long that people have had enough and just accept that he is a fake one, I believe the real Nakamoto will be eager to prove that he is the creator of Bitcoin by doing what the community demanded.
sr. member
Activity: 254
Merit: 1258
signing message through the address that contains millions of bitcoin. Logging in using satoshi account in this forum and many more and he can do none of them. He's just faketoshi and people should just ignore him. Although it's true that he's making a noise for bitcoin but rather a negative noise and it won't help the development of bitcoin market at all.
Signing into the account on here wouldn't mean shit, the email tied to it had been compromised and as far as I remember Theymos has locked it down.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 268
bullsvsbears.io
To prove that he is not just like another faketoshi, he needs to prove that he is the real one. But you know what's hard in doing that? It's because we have already put in our mindset that he's not telling the truth and he's just making stupid noise. If he's the real Satoshi, why does he need to take so much time before proving his identity? Right now he can't prove that he's not a faketoshi because no one will believe him now after all those lies.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1036
Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.
Signing a message is one way that he can prove that he is not Faketoshi. If he can do it then I and many people here will believe that he is really the creator of Bitcoin.
Another one is transferring a bit of the 1 Million Bitcoin to another address. This will be another proof that he has the access of the address who holds a million Bitcoin thus, proving that he really is Satoshi

Unfortunately, he can't do both of them. I saw an article a while ago and it is stated that he doesn't have the private keys to open the address who holds a million Bitcoin. Another fail from him again. As long as he doesn't have any access on it, he will be faketoshi until his last breath Cheesy.
hero member
Activity: 1273
Merit: 507
There are many ways in which Craig Wright can prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and this is the signing message  on Satoshi's verified wallet. This is simple requirements that CW can't provide. 
Maybe if Craig Wright will prove this he will score big points here to prove her claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto!  
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 575
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

The one who wrote the Bitcoin code and the one who originally own the Satoshi Nakamoto account in this forum is very much a different person from Wright, not to mention his refusal to open the wallet, and not supportive of Nakamoto's original work, so many things have set him apart from the real Nakamoto, and this is where his problem, he cannot convince people that he is the real one.
sr. member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 255
I can't believe that issue is still being debated. stop making him famous. Of course he is not Satoshi. Craig stated that If he really isn't Satoshi, then the real Satoshi must have plagiarized his work. He is showing the ridiculousness of the claim through sarcasm. In other words, he must be Satoshi. Whether you believe it or not, it doesn't change the intent. Maybe he is just enjoying taking the part of a Joker or a Clown of crypto. a little overacting sometimes but for the sake of your sanity don't take him seriously.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 529
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
signing message through the address that contains millions of bitcoin. Logging in using satoshi account in this forum and many more and he can do none of them. He's just faketoshi and people should just ignore him. Although it's true that he's making a noise for bitcoin but rather a negative noise and it won't help the development of bitcoin market at all.
and that is the only thing that the whole crypto market is asking for him Sign a message for those addresses he presented lately in court for all of this to stop and prove he is the real Satoshi nakamoto but the sad thing?he cannot do because he is a Fake and will not be Satoshi forever.

If he's able to do any of that, he should've done so the first time head made the claim. Now even if he does, people still wouldn't believe him. Anyone who claims to be satoshi wouldn't have enough evidence to prove they are, it's as simple as that. These are only claims that can't be validated. Too many novelties in crypto to take any of them seriously.
Pages:
Jump to: