inb4 massive premine and tears caused by dumping. No it looks like complete garbage and the fact that they're actively speculating on the price makes it even worse/illegal (though current regulations don't make it illegal).
Also they claim a lot, trying to stir hype on their rubbish. Plus aidropped coins don't ever really do that well since there's always massive dumping. There's no incentive to hold because no one really cares/invested in it. People are just looking to dump it on the next sucker. With ICOs you pay for you have plenty of dedicated investors that work with the project and community to build something worthwile. I can't see this being anything worthwile to get into.
With miners you have electricity costs and network support. There needs to be economic incentives for a project to succeed, not just:
''Get in our ICO noa because 100x and it will be 50k per coin..''
Doesn't work that way sorry.
Also they claim a lot, trying to stir hype on their rubbish. Plus aidropped coins don't ever really do that well since there's always massive dumping. There's no incentive to hold because no one really cares/invested in it. People are just looking to dump it on the next sucker. With ICOs you pay for you have plenty of dedicated investors that work with the project and community to build something worthwile. I can't see this being anything worthwile to get into.
With miners you have electricity costs and network support. There needs to be economic incentives for a project to succeed, not just:
''Get in our ICO noa because 100x and it will be 50k per coin..''
Doesn't work that way sorry.
www.fluidledger.com does not speculate price: So that is libel
The op of this thread mentioned 100x
3,000 participants in the ICO and you say this!
Ha ha ha
You morons think that if you shill for a garbage to scam people you could actually get some money out of it, 3000 participants are looking for a free lunch otherwise you are the only one defending this. You're an illiterate noob, Read his post and understand it first. 
