Do you believe that successful sportsbooks focus on balancing the payout odds versus the bets on each side of the ledger, rather than caring about winners in sports books?
Hold on, all of a sudden, are we now trying to prove that the casinos don't actually take tickets into account? If you think they just go ahead to merge/balance 'em tickets on each side of the ledger, how do they make profits?
Secondly, it doesn't make much sense to me since we'll always have more losing tickets; so let's assume 1000 games were merged, 650 were lost tickets and 200 were winnings (which ofcourse is controlled by the house edge to not exceed the net interest at the end), then maybe 150 refund tickets (depending on their %) after the subsiquent bet is concluded, what happens to options that need refund like the draw no bet and the rest??
I don't know how these bookies operate, but I feel we're gambling against the game itself, putting the casino in the middle to make profit regardless of whether you're able to win or not... Yes, they regulate the whole process with the odds that you see.
Casinos pays the sports bets with their bankroll and not with the losers money. They have diferentes odds in the games, that way they can win in long run.
Even if they decide to pay with it, are y'all not supposed to wait till the bets are settled before payments are made? That way, even without extra income as some of y'all claim, they can pay off of what they make.