I'm not a big believer in the distinction between 'painted' and 'real'
So you think that there is not a great distinction between volume that is generated by essentially just one, or a very few pairs of hands, working in cahoots, playing high frequency pass the parcel between accounts which they control, with bundles of BTC, in order to create a false impression of massive interest and/or support in BTC, at a certain level, and volume generated by a flood of interest in BTC; with a great number of individual seperate market players, coming rushing to the exchanges to buy BTC, where, it just so happens, there is also a glut of individuals looking to offload BTC, only for trhe bulls to win in dramatic fashion?
C'mon. Surely there is a massive difference between painted and real volume, and what each of those characteristics tell us about the condition of the market we are playing in? Sure, the interim result may be the same. Bitcoin jumped up $30 today, in a very short space of time. Had you bought 10 BTC today at $430, sell now, and you have made $250 profit! Awesome! But the difference between a bull market being driven by Tape Painters, and one being driven by organic volume, is that in the circumstances of the former, the whole market essentially relies upon the whims of what the Tape Painters want to do next, and that is a very precarious and dangerous situation, for all other market participants.
Did 'they' bring Bitcoin up into this zone, simply so that they could sell wholesale BTC to retail buyers, and then short the fuck out of it, relying on retail sellers to replenish 'them' with wholesale priced Bitcoin way back down below? Or do 'they' have the intention of now sending Bitcoin through it's previous high and up towards dizzying new heights? Can TA studies tell us anything about what 'they' intend to do next, when it is 'they' who have manipulated the condition of so many technical indicators in the first place and 'they' can have the market basically lie to us about what 'they' are going to do next with it?
I think the difference between a largely organic market, and one that his strung to relatively few powerful hands, is massive, and don't understand how anyone could fail to see an important distinction
here.