Is this worth a negative feedback? [Community View - icosonar]

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: Patatas on June 15, 2019, 10:19:15 AM

Report the thread or report the post?

Thread.

Quote

17. Trading of goods that are illegal in the seller's or buyer's country is forbidden.

I am not sure about post because it doesn't reveal anything except they want to discuss something, although developing site which will be used to sell illegal goods should also fit in this category.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: marlboroza on June 15, 2019, 10:16:43 AM

Quote from: Patatas on June 15, 2019, 09:57:59 AM

Absolutely illegal.

Report them, moderator should be able to handle this.

Report the thread or report the post? I doubt that will help because my case is against the user who is willing to do illegal activities for money and what will stop them from doing it in the future? An appropriate flag could be suitable as a warning but again it wouldn't help if I'm not directly scammed by them.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: Patatas on June 15, 2019, 09:57:59 AM

Absolutely illegal.

Report them, moderator should be able to handle this.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Thanks, everyone for their inputs, I've removed the negative ratings. The problem with such accounts is, they don't leave a chance to make money even if it means doing something illegal or someone else has chances to lose money. For instance, someone started a thread

Quote from: boyo112233 on June 15, 2019, 08:04:14 AM

please pm me on telegram @blackpanther

almosst 1000$ a week deal for 2 months timeline

icosonar replied

Quote from: icosonar on June 15, 2019, 08:22:46 AM

Please share some details. You can add my telegram @KnightThunder

Now, anyone experienced enough will know how the scams on LBC works. The take such verified accounts and scam other traders without leaving a trace about their identity. Account sells, in general, create rooms for scams.

Another example of this user getting ready to do illegal stuff is this one,

Quote from: crocoticket on June 13, 2019, 02:58:29 PM

I need exact website like that: https://www.fakeflighttickets.com/

On-airport before you enter a country you must show come back (onward ticket to get in.)
if you don't have, you can make a fake generator ticket to show at the airport
this is precisely the service I want to offer to people.

All fake tickets I want through Expedia.

Example
https://www.fakeflighttickets.com/FakeFlightTickets.com-Sample.pdf

Attention:

You need to add code that searches all the cities in the world and create in click the fake ticket
The website will be free (Without payment integration such as PayPal or credit card)

icosonar replies

Quote from: icosonar on June 14, 2019, 04:47:28 AM

I have read your description and requires a discussion. Please add my telegram @KnightThunder for the further talk.

Now, he's ready to code a project which generates fake flight tickets to be used to get an entry inside an airport. Absolutely illegal.

HCP

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 4361

I don't think a negative tag is appropriate for this sort of behaviour (at most perhaps a neutral tag)... and I'm glad that OP seems to have removed it.

Given that they aren't just spamming in non-related threads and they appear to be sticking to "Help wanted" type threads... Personally, I don't have an issue with it. They don't even seem to be necro-posting, but replying within a day or 2 of the OPs... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: LeGaulois on June 09, 2019, 03:21:05 PM

There is nothing wrong with trying to conduct a good business here, but spamming the form the way he does is pretty much a good enough reason for him to be banned, and i won't be surprised if he is.

There is a thin line between practicing our rights and totally making the forum look terrible because of our spam/shitposts, after all this is not Freelancer.com ,being able to make money here is not a privilege, and not being a shitposter is a rule.

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 4101

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: mikeywith on June 09, 2019, 06:49:26 AM

If i had the ability, i would most likely give him a perma-ban for that how shity his posts are, but a negative tag for this matter is indeed not appropriate in my opinion, there is nothing close to serious that suggests he is a scammer or trying to scam, he might be lying about being an Android Dev but still does not make him a scammer.

it's your choice, but i would most certainly not tag him for the reasons you stated.

Why a perma ban? If it's a forum user who is just interested to use it to find a business to do. He shouldn't be banned for not to be interested in anything else in the forum. Otherwise, we could argue about to ban users who log in just to post BTC news (title, description, read more, link).
If he's a "bad worker" is something else, scamming too.

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

If i had the ability, i would most likely give him a perma-ban for that how shity his posts are, but a negative tag for this matter is indeed not appropriate in my opinion, there is nothing close to serious that suggests he is a scammer or trying to scam, he might be lying about being an Android Dev but still does not make him a scammer.

it's your choice, but i would most certainly not tag him for the reasons you stated.

CryptopreneurBrainboss

legendary

Activity: 2450

Merit: 4295

eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.

I don't support tagging for spam. If you see a user spamming, reporting the spam to moderator for deletion of post will be the appropriate thing to do, you can also include a suggestion of ban when the issue is a repeat offense. The reason you left for the red tagged is a missuse of the trust system.

If you had tagged the user for showing some signs related to scam and requested he should come defend himself for the red tag to be removed who had be a better reason instead of the spam reason. Your trust feedback should help prevent scam not spam

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 4543

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: bones261 on June 08, 2019, 09:38:12 AM

I was going to recommend giving him a break. However, when I look at his untrusted feedback, there is a recent complaint against him.

I reacted the same way initially, and went through the same process. Just because he doesn't want to show his previous work doesn't mean he's lying about it, he could have NDAs with his previous clients. But a sample portfolio of work he's done just for the sake of having a sample portfolio seems like something he'd have after doing it 5 years.

If he were to ask for money upfront, I'd be very suspicious.

To opine about Patatas' original question; I tend agree with the sentiments of others, red-tags shouldn't be given for spamming unless it's an extreme case. This does qualify as an extreme case of spam, and don't begrudge your decision to tag the account. I would reword the review to adhere to the facts, and leave out any racial epithets.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Since it appears the guy is only trying to get a job and he limits it to less than once a day, I was going to recommend giving him a break. However, when I look at his untrusted feedback, there is a recent complaint against him. Unfortunately, it does not appear the complainer has made a dedicated thread on the subject, as written in the complaint, and the complaint was made on 05/22/2019.

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

I never sent feedback for spam, should be a moderators job.

Just report as zero value post and they will eventually temp ban him for spam.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 2226

Signature space for rent

Although feedback's depend on you where will you leave, but I don't think someone deserve red tag for spam. Also admin isn't encourage to tag spammer and really spam isn't part of trust system. Perhaps you might open thread on meta about that spam and obviously moderators will take appropriate actions since spam belongs to forum moderation.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Patatas on June 08, 2019, 08:39:10 AM

For now, I've left them negative feedback for spamming services and an unreliable developer. Should I keep the feedback or remove it? I feel these scums live off project owners upfront money and have no real potential to launch any projects or write two decent lines of code for that matter.

Too many people tell too many lies to make coin.

As long as you don't run around tagging every spammer, the rare exception is OK if it's extreme enough.

But I would get rid of the racial hate in the feedback....

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 09:19:18 AM

Sorry.Slightly sleepy,I thought its under trading discussion. Cheesy

Well, Scam Accusations and Reputation are the sub-boards inside trading discussion lol You should probably sleep.

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 09:19:18 AM

Maybe your can revise it into neutral or remove it after a valid reply from that person,until that keep which can serve as a warning for the newbies.

I'm waiting for feedback from other DT-1/DT-2 members to see what's their stance on the case and then revise the feedback if need to.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Quote from: Patatas on June 08, 2019, 08:56:03 AM

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 08:51:13 AM

Negative feedback not meant for spamming but here it looks more than spammy.If his service involves money but doesn't want to provide any proof for his legitimacy then he/she deserves a red tag.

He said he is doing android for 5 years and didn't give me any proofs when asked for so my negative feedback is justified I guess? It is a different level of spamming when you claim to be a master in a particular service requirement and you actually bring zero skills to the table.

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 08:51:13 AM

I guess it need to be on Reputation section.

What do you mean? It is already in the Reputation section.

Sorry.Slightly sleepy,I thought its under trading discussion. Cheesy

Maybe your can revise it into neutral or remove it after a valid reply from that person,until that keep which can serve as a warning for the newbies.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: logfiles on June 08, 2019, 09:10:57 AM

Just seen the post history and it's spam, spam and spam.
Haven't yet come across someone get red tagged for spamming but i think a neutral feedback would just do fine.
I am not sure how effective reporting such posts to mods is?
If they can actually delete spammy posts of this kind then i think a neutral tag and a report to mods option would be okay though it would be a lot of work reporting each post.

I recollect @TP tagging users for spamming in the past which was quite frowned upon. Here the problem is not just spamming but faking their projects and experience. They claim to be providing that service but in reality, when asked for proofs they can't show any. The tag will serve as a warning for recruiters who will be risking by hiring them for any sort of jobs. I appreciate your feedback though.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1827

Top Crypto Casino

Just seen the post history and it's spam, spam and spam.
Haven't yet come across someone get red tagged for spamming but i think a neutral feedback would just do fine.
I am not sure how effective reporting such posts to mods is?
If they can actually delete spammy posts of this kind then i think a neutral tag and a report to mods option would be okay though it would be a lot of work reporting each post.

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 08:51:13 AM

Negative feedback not meant for spamming but here it looks more than spammy.If his service involves money but doesn't want to provide any proof for his legitimacy then he/she deserves a red tag.

He said he is doing android for 5 years and didn't give me any proofs when asked for so my negative feedback is justified I guess? It is a different level of spamming when you claim to be a master in a particular service requirement and you actually bring zero skills to the table.

Quote from: Findingnemo on June 08, 2019, 08:51:13 AM

I guess it need to be on Reputation section.

What do you mean? It is already in the Reputation section.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Negative feedback not meant for spamming but here it looks more than spammy.If his service involves money but doesn't want to provide any proof for his legitimacy then he/she deserves a red tag.

I guess it need to be on Reputation section.

Topic: Is this worth a negative feedback? [Community View - icosonar] (Read 405 times)