various state intelligence agencies know who Satoshi Nakamoto is.
Topic: Is Vitalik Buterin Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 4. (Read 4062 times)
Of course, and they purged him and buried him somewhere in the sea like Bin Laden so that no crypto enthusiast could make a pilgrimage to his grave
Went are we still trying to find out who satoshi is. He wants to keep his identity secret, can't we just let him do that?
various state intelligence agencies know who Satoshi Nakamoto is.
... It is disrespecting satoshi to even suggest this. ...
You are right when Satoshi is one person. If Satoshi is two or more persons then Vitalik definietly deserves more respect then Satoshi.
Do not get me wrong. I do not want to rate whom is better or greater, I just refer to your post.
The age is probably the number one reason why this would not be possible. Not because of the code, but because of the way he was communicating, that is not how a 14 year old communicates.
It would appear so indeed. Taking in consideration, everything I have seen about it I think my theory is nothing more than pure speculation. If Vitalik is not Satoshi, then it could be someone else out there (probably a very experienced programmer or a multimillionaire person with very good skills) But I wouldn't care much about who or whom Satoshi could be. The most important thing is that he created Bitcoin and the block chain.
Stop this stuff about Vitalik and Ethereum already.
Yes he made a nice platform and yes he did a good marketing campaign, but he would not have been able to do this without bitcoin gaining the traction it did. It is disrespecting satoshi to even suggest this.
The age is probably the number one reason why this would not be possible. Not because of the code, but because of the way he was communicating, that is not how a 14 year old communicates.
Yes he made a nice platform and yes he did a good marketing campaign, but he would not have been able to do this without bitcoin gaining the traction it did. It is disrespecting satoshi to even suggest this.
The age is probably the number one reason why this would not be possible. Not because of the code, but because of the way he was communicating, that is not how a 14 year old communicates.
No, definitely not!
The Bitcoin core software was not written overnight, therefore he would have to start already one or two years earlier at the age of 12 or 13. Impossible from my point of view.
The Bitcoin core software was not written overnight, therefore he would have to start already one or two years earlier at the age of 12 or 13. Impossible from my point of view.
It's not unlikely as most people think, but I doubt that he is in the top 100 list of geniuses in the world. Here is a list of some of the legendary geniuses, http://www.wonderslist.com/10-genius-child-prodigies-world/
ETH is not that revolutionary as most ETH pumpers make it out to be... and many did the same with other Alt coins, like Ripple and Dash. Let's just accept the fact that Satoshi were the original
innovator and the others just copy cats.
ETH is not that revolutionary as most ETH pumpers make it out to be... and many did the same with other Alt coins, like Ripple and Dash. Let's just accept the fact that Satoshi were the original
innovator and the others just copy cats.
#5 on the list - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aelita_Andre - snuck into Satoshi Roundtable last weekend, hiding under a table. She remembered everything that transpired, later painting an accurate depiction of the proceedings.
if we knew the Kanji Japanese characters used to compound and form 'Satoshi Nakamoto' we might be able to decode the meaning of the name as a starting point to identify the person or persons behind bitcoin. I've always assumed it was a cryptic name puzzle to be solve and is not a real person (although it can exist as a real name in Japan). I've only ever seen to written in Roman script. Has it ever been written in Kanji?
sa = 'little'?
to = ?
shi = 'new'?
naka = 'middle'?
moto = 'origin'?
sa = 'little'?
to = ?
shi = 'new'?
naka = 'middle'?
moto = 'origin'?
VB -> born 1994. BTC -> white paper 2008.
Would have been age 14 FYI
Yea this may prove OP's theory completely wrong. And In my opinion Satoshi Nakamoto sound a name for old man don't you think? lolWould have been age 14 FYI
I could be completely wrong as you might say, but I was just stating the possibility of whenever this could be true or not. As for the Satoshi Nakamoto name, it could be either a person or a group of people. Or maybe Nakamoto is a girl?
A girl really.. interesting theory lol but hight unlikely to be true. Just doesn't sound right I mean why would a girl use a male alias.
Then why people are using pseudonyms, a pen names or nick names in the first place?
Personally I don't think Vitalik is Satoshi if that is the case he could easily reveal himself and claim that Ethereum is better version of his previous creation and Bitcoin 2.0
It's not unlikely as most people think, but I doubt that he is in the top 100 list of geniuses in the world. Here is a list of some of the legendary geniuses, http://www.wonderslist.com/10-genius-child-prodigies-world/
ETH is not that revolutionary as most ETH pumpers make it out to be... and many did the same with other Alt coins, like Ripple and Dash. Let's just accept the fact that Satoshi were the original
innovator and the others just copy cats.
ETH is not that revolutionary as most ETH pumpers make it out to be... and many did the same with other Alt coins, like Ripple and Dash. Let's just accept the fact that Satoshi were the original
innovator and the others just copy cats.
ETH dev cant be the Legendary Satoshi Nakamoto. Common!
Satoshi Nakamoto wanted an online currency with fundamentals opposite to the current world financial system.
Satoshi Nakamoto programmed BTC to be a scarce coin for payment transfers, which has speculative properties.
BTC coin cap is 21 million and current supply is 15 million, over 7+ years.
Vitalik Buterin created an online contracting system with fundamentals consistent with the current world financial system.
Vitalik Buterin programmed ETH to be a non-scarce token to execute contracts, which has no speculative properties.
ETH coin cap is unlimited and current supply is 77 million, over 6+ months.
Both are two different concepts and are the creations of two different ways of looking at life.
Satoshi Nakamoto programmed BTC to be a scarce coin for payment transfers, which has speculative properties.
BTC coin cap is 21 million and current supply is 15 million, over 7+ years.
Vitalik Buterin created an online contracting system with fundamentals consistent with the current world financial system.
Vitalik Buterin programmed ETH to be a non-scarce token to execute contracts, which has no speculative properties.
ETH coin cap is unlimited and current supply is 77 million, over 6+ months.
Both are two different concepts and are the creations of two different ways of looking at life.
VB -> born 1994. BTC -> white paper 2008.
Would have been age 14 FYI
Yea this may prove OP's theory completely wrong. And In my opinion Satoshi Nakamoto sound a name for old man don't you think? lolWould have been age 14 FYI
I could be completely wrong as you might say, but I was just stating the possibility of whenever this could be true or not. As for the Satoshi Nakamoto name, it could be either a person or a group of people. Or maybe Nakamoto is a girl?
A girl really.. interesting theory lol but hight unlikely to be true. Just doesn't sound right I mean why would a girl use a male alias.
OP you can't be serious.
2008 when Satoshi published the Bitcoin white paper Buterin has hardly reached puberty.
So no he is not Satoshi.Never ever!
2008 when Satoshi published the Bitcoin white paper Buterin has hardly reached puberty.
So no he is not Satoshi.Never ever!
Lol. So about my theory of Nakamoto being a girl, do you think it could be a possibility of doing so? Perhaps, she is a very smart programmer which tries to hide under a male name (Satoshi Nakamoto).
OP you can't be serious.
2008 when Satoshi published the Bitcoin white paper Buterin has hardly reached puberty.
So no he is not Satoshi.Never ever!
2008 when Satoshi published the Bitcoin white paper Buterin has hardly reached puberty.
So no he is not Satoshi.Never ever!
VB -> born 1994. BTC -> white paper 2008.
Would have been age 14 FYI
Yea this may prove OP's theory completely wrong. And In my opinion Satoshi Nakamoto sound a name for old man don't you think? lolWould have been age 14 FYI
I could be completely wrong as you might say, but I was just stating the possibility of whenever this could be true or not. As for the Satoshi Nakamoto name, it could be either a person or a group of people. Or maybe Nakamoto is a girl?
my vote for maybe because till now i was wondering who is Satoshi Nakamoto does he really exist in this world or not
and if he really existed i think he the most mysterious person in this world because nobody can proof that who is he
and if he really existed i think he the most mysterious person in this world because nobody can proof that who is he
VB -> born 1994. BTC -> white paper 2008.
Would have been age 14 FYI
Would have been age 14 FYI
What part of "is one the most smartest programmers in which he created the Ethereum platform himself" in the OP confused you? If you check VB's BD you'll learnt that he started working on SN's WP when he was 1101.
making a blockchain from scratch is not anything magical.(anymore)
there are many ways to do it and many programming languages to do it with,
for instance before the 1960s there used to be a legend that if anyone ran 100 metres in under 10 seconds. their lungs would explode.
then in 1968 it was proven wrong when people started to achieve it.
and now its common place for athletes to run under 10 seconds.
so does that make linford christy the same person that broke the 10second barrier in 1968? nope.
in short once people know the impossible (decentralized money) is actually possible, and learn how it done. then the magic fades and it becomes common place.
some people may take shortcuts (scriptkiddy pump'n'dump coins) and some people start from scratch. but that in itself is no evidence at all that the the newest person is the original person
there are many ways to do it and many programming languages to do it with,
for instance before the 1960s there used to be a legend that if anyone ran 100 metres in under 10 seconds. their lungs would explode.
then in 1968 it was proven wrong when people started to achieve it.
and now its common place for athletes to run under 10 seconds.
so does that make linford christy the same person that broke the 10second barrier in 1968? nope.
in short once people know the impossible (decentralized money) is actually possible, and learn how it done. then the magic fades and it becomes common place.
some people may take shortcuts (scriptkiddy pump'n'dump coins) and some people start from scratch. but that in itself is no evidence at all that the the newest person is the original person
Jump to: