Your wealth represents your stake in life, how much influence you hold over the direction of the world; having very little wealth means having very little influence, and vice versa with a lot of wealth (assuming we're not strictly referring to material wealth alone of course, there is wealth in everything from character to skill to relationships.) You know all those hours you spend fulfilling the desires of others? That's what wealth can do for you: those who know how to allocate their wealth intelligently can build their wealth to great numbers (i.e. operate successful businesses), whereas those who can't expend their wealth to any good wind up going broke (wealth gets released to people who are better at allocating it, or perhaps just as bad, inevitably winding up in the hands of the better allocator). Those who know how to allocate their wealth reasonably also happen to be very good at producing action (usually desirable but sometimes not in the case of political spenders esp.), it's how they get so rich to begin with (pursuing goals and dreams rather than sitting in meadows and meditating). In other words, those who seek great wealth also seek great action, which means the wealthiest are, consequently, the most active in the world, spurring action far greater than they could ever produce alone.
Having so much stake in the direction the world moves (combined with a drive to produce action, mind you), considering competitors who would want you financially crushed or even dead, protecting your stake from poor investment or straight-up theft (see: modern government), there's nothing boring about it: it is true freedom. Being the person who does nothing but bring someone else's dreams to life, that is the boring existence. Those who think wealth is boring are completely delusional, and probably themselves lacking in any substantial wealth for if they can't see anything to do with a great deal of wealth, they surely cannot see what to do with even a little.
TL;DR thread is secretly a poll to see who will succeed in life and who will complain about the successors and perhaps subsequently demand repentance for the injustice of inequality
Yes a poorer guy would be more helpful then that of the richer guy. The poor person understands the emotions of others as he has gone through the same phase.
Comparatively rich people don't have respect for the poor and they don't treat them as they should be treated. It is better to be poor and helpful rather to be a rich and useless
They say if you put this conversation close to your ear, you can actually hear the cognitive dissonance...