I often report such posts as "low-quality posts."
I would add to the report that this is also a zero-effort post, although in the end it all boils down to the same thing, and I agree that such posts/topics should be reported as soon as possible because the moderators usually delete them, unless there are too many responses, which usually means that they will choose to lock the thread.
Furthermore, what still needs to be checked is whether it is about someone who is simply following the line of least resistance and in that way trying to catch a few merits, or whether it is about someone who is paid to post links - and given that we know that in the past many have been paid to shill links from various crypto sites, it adds another new dimension to the reports.
I can agree with this.
It's important to always check the motivation of the author of the post and the reason for publishing.
Usually, due to the signature of campaigns and the requirement for a certain number of posts, campaign members write a large number of posts in a short time and then it is often easiest for them to copy entire articles from the Internet and add the source of the information, which is not a good practice and should be discouraged.
The right way is to read the article, write a summary in your own words and post a link from the original article.
Any such post that literally copies the entire text from the Internet, without any desire or effort by the OP to add his contribution, should be reported as a low-quality post and deleted.
