Issue with neg trust rating - This must hit Lauda, i need help!

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: bones261 on April 22, 2019, 02:12:27 PM

Quote from: Thule on April 22, 2019, 01:45:17 PM

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

Well, that would mean that Yobit is lying.

https://yobit.net/en/signature/details/

Quote

★☆★ Rules ★☆★

Poor quality and unconstructive posts will not be tolerated on this campaign. You don't need to write an essay with each post but one word replies in spammy off topic threads or streams of constant half-assed one liners will immediately get you removed. Please just put some effort in to your posts and you'll be fine.

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.

Any user who hasn't made a post in over a month will also be removed.

Yes

Anyway they got banned by theymos for 60 days.Let's see how quickly they will come back with a known campaign manager

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: Thule on April 22, 2019, 01:45:17 PM

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

Well, that would mean that Yobit is lying.

https://yobit.net/en/signature/details/

Quote

★☆★ Rules ★☆★

Poor quality and unconstructive posts will not be tolerated on this campaign. You don't need to write an essay with each post but one word replies in spammy off topic threads or streams of constant half-assed one liners will immediately get you removed. Please just put some effort in to your posts and you'll be fine.

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.

Any user who hasn't made a post in over a month will also be removed.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: bones261 on April 22, 2019, 01:32:40 PM

Quote from: Thule on April 22, 2019, 05:43:37 AM

Quote

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.

Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

Yobit has already stated that they will be booting participants with red trust. Also, the process of joining the yobit signature campaign is done on yobit's webpage. From what I can tell, the main function of the campaign manager will be to audit participant's posts and make recommendations for any removals if the content is poor. If they don't hire someone from outside of the organization, someone from their staff will have to do it. After all, I'm sure Yobit doesn't want to pay posters who post garbage that are more likely to give them a worse reputation than they already have, rather than getting new customers to click on the link.

Yobit bets on high amount and not on quality.
Also i highly doubt they will ban high ranked members with negative feedback.
What Yobit wants is results and they will get it best with massiv amount of signatur post.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: Thule on April 22, 2019, 05:43:37 AM

Quote

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.

Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

Yobit has already stated that they will be booting participants with red trust. Also, the process of joining the yobit signature campaign is done on yobit's webpage. From what I can tell, the main function of the campaign manager will be to audit participant's posts and make recommendations for any removals if the content is poor. If they don't hire someone from outside of the organization, someone from their staff will have to do it. After all, I'm sure Yobit doesn't want to pay posters who post garbage that are more likely to give them a worse reputation than they already have, rather than getting new customers to click on the link.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote

They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278

You need asslicker yahoo as campaign manager for what ?To get higher pay for lower amount of posts so only your gang will be choosen as signature participants ?

You are mad because yobit is still taking indirectly negative trust members ?

You know thats a result of your abusive action.

There are no more much people left without negative feedback which aren't in your gang who would be able to participate.

Its the first sign that trust feedback is absolete.Noone watching at it anymore.
Your power tool losing its power.

A result of the massiv abuse which is happening via trust feedback.

So i just need to sit back and relax and see how that shitty feedback system gets slowly destroyed thanks to the abuse you guys do every day

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

r1s2g3 is missing the point, as usual for low brow ass kissing members.

The pharmacist is a confirmed supporter of lauda. He is also a sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spamming sock puppet hugeblackwoman. He openly admits he does not have the capacity to understand if lauda is a scammer, but will support him regardless because he is an ass kisser.

So his own opinion on this is cast in doubt also. There is not point relying on the opinions of those that are observably untrustworthy or their supporters who by their support are untrustworthy as well.

Their observable double standards and trust abuse will come to an end, or it will just mean the entire board will turn into a war zone.

r1s2g3

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 395

I am alive but in hibernation.

Quote from: HCP on April 20, 2019, 07:48:00 PM

So... in summary:

Alt account == "Wife's Account" == Trust farming with "loans" + ~~probable~~ ban evasion?

Is that about right or did I miss something?

Not probable, It is confirmed banned evasion.

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:48:20 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:44:13 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:36:07 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:17:24 PM

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed. I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda. I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda). Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

It also means that TP has full trust in Lauda . (I guess that is the purpose of trust that you do not need to individually scrutinize everything, so have faith on other judgement.)

TheNewAnon135246

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1989

฿uy ฿itcoin

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:48:20 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:44:13 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:36:07 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:17:24 PM

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed. I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda. I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda). Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

This sounds like you are hearing what you want to hear (as usual).

HCP

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 4361

So... in summary:

Alt account == "Wife's Account" == Trust farming with "loans" + probable ban evasion?

Is that about right or did I miss something?

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:44:13 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:36:07 PM

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: morvillz7z on April 20, 2019, 02:39:59 PM

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills. Grin

That is good enough evidence for me.

(Sorry, sent 2 sMerit the wrong post.)

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1174

Quote from: ShooterXD on April 20, 2019, 02:32:08 PM

This is my rage:
https://archive.fo/PQ5z2

About the same address I know it's my fault, but for me, everything that is mine belongs to my wife and vice versa.

Making another address in a wallet takes less than a second. Do you also share phone number, email and social media profiles with your wife? Do you see how ridiculous it sounds?
I'll remind you again that you are evading a ban posting here to argue about red trust when your other account is banned. You should first resolve that matter and then worry about your trust.

Quote from: morvillz7z on April 20, 2019, 02:39:59 PM

Actually, I was waiting to hear what excuse he'd come up with, I have to admit that it's not very original.

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills. Grin

https://i.ibb.co/gdv4bqL/trust3.jpg

He claims to be broke and he share everything with his wife, but he paid her back with interest. Roll Eyes

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:44:13 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:36:07 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:17:24 PM

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed. I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda. I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda). Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

This sounds like you think lauda doesn’t act reasonably (and that you support it). Good to know.

If you are what is essentially taking laudas side without even looking at the rating in question, it looks like you are just blindly taking his side.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Quickseller on April 20, 2019, 02:36:07 PM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:17:24 PM

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

What, only two choices?

I wrote what I wrote because I know that once Lauda leaves a neg, it is not often reversed. I did not even read what was written in either of his negs from Lauda. I just took a quick glance at his trust page and noticed that there were two (and one positive not from Lauda). Don't try to ensnare me in your autistic little traps.

morvillz7z

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 2061

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Actually, I was waiting to hear what excuse he'd come up with, I have to admit that it's not very original.

Here, his wifey leaving positive feedback, lending him some 0.5 btc to pay the bills. Grin

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 20, 2019, 02:17:24 PM

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

Do you think this because you think the rating is legitimate or because lauda doesn’t act reasonably

ShooterXD

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 501

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: coolcoinz on April 20, 2019, 02:19:19 PM

The good old my wife, my bro, my gf, my roommate excuse. Does everyone around you use the same exact bitcoin address? If my wife was using bitcointalk she would at the very least have her own computer with her own wallet. If you guys are taking turns on the same computer with the same exact address, it's beyond suspicious.

Also, don't post outside the meta if your account is banned or you'll get another one. Especially now that you've confirmed it.

Quote from: ShooterXD on April 20, 2019, 12:00:40 PM

And Lauda, i need to say sorry for any rage coming from me.

Your chances of getting Lauda to change that rating were slim before you raged. Now, I'd say they are below 1%.

This is my rage:
https://archive.fo/PQ5z2

About the same address I know it's my fault, but for me, everything that is mine belongs to my wife and vice versa.

coolcoinz

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1174

The good old my wife, my bro, my gf, my roommate excuse. Does everyone around you use the same exact bitcoin address? If my wife was using bitcointalk she would at the very least have her own computer with her own wallet. If you guys are taking turns on the same computer with the same exact address, it's beyond suspicious.

Also, don't post outside the meta if your account is banned or you'll get another one. Especially now that you've confirmed it.

Quote from: ShooterXD on April 20, 2019, 12:00:40 PM

And Lauda, i need to say sorry for any rage coming from me.

Your chances of getting Lauda to change that rating were slim before you raged. Now, I'd say they are below 1%.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: ShooterXD on April 20, 2019, 01:59:17 PM

This acc used fopr my wife, but ok

Yeah, right. Heard that one a million times already.

Did Yobit actually let you into their campaign with the negs from Lauda? You have one positive offsetting them, but I would think your feedback is tainted enough such that they wouldn't accept you. They really do need a good manager like Yahoo62278 who'd spot you immediately as a shitposter who is only marginally comprehensible.

Good luck trying to get feedback removed from Lauda. Not likely to happen, bud.

ShooterXD

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 501

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: morvillz7z on April 20, 2019, 01:22:54 PM

@ShooterXD, is there any chance PaymyBills is an alt account of yours?

You both used the same BTC address:

Code:

17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

Quote from: PaymyBills on September 11, 2016, 05:09:35 AM

I would like to enroll on this campaign.
User: Pay my Bills
Postion to Apply: newbie
Posts Start: 23
Address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV

Quote from: ShooterXD on August 26, 2016, 02:36:29 PM

I see 1 slot free, im in?

Name: ShooterXD
Post count: 1230
Rank: full member
Bitcoin address: 17zND67z87euMxTEe6Xe2REp4dw3FA6kPV
Profile UID: 819403

Oh, I almost forgot...PaymyBills account is banned, hasn't made a single post since March 2017 but for some odd reason has logged in a few hours ago. Roll Eyes

This acc used fopr my wife, but ok.

I think this is a poloniex wallet and at this time unfortunately I did not have the knowledge about RULES relating to this type of terms.
It's all my fault, I know Sad

And i logged in The acc today cause The acc is autologged in The notebook.
I dont have nothing to hide.

Topic: Issue with neg trust rating - This must hit Lauda, i need help! (Read 476 times)