Issue with Vod - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

whywefight

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1042

www.explorerz.top

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 02, 2016, 11:40:28 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 02, 2016, 11:20:17 AM

This is slightly off topic, however it still has to do with Vod, so it is probably appropriate to post in this thread, have there ever actually been any examples of the MSDN codes going bad and the seller not honoring their side of the agreement? Or is all of the negative ratings that were left for the MSDN sellers that say the MSDN codes will go bad and that the seller will just disappear nothing more then speculation?

One thing that I have noticed is that scammers with existing negative trust have sold outright non-existent MSDN codes and were able to get their victims to send first because all of the MSDN sellers have negative trust

Nope and that's the whole point... Vod is somebody who miss-uses his green trust to put red on others whenever he "thinks" he is right. He is policing everybody and everything, putting red trust on A LOT of people that never scammed anybody on this forum whenever he feels like it.

There should be a firm rule that states when user post negative trust proof, with screenshots, must be provided.

are you really claiming something has to be done correct while you do something that is obvious not?? So fucking lol. made my day.

Ghost55

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Quickseller on February 02, 2016, 11:20:17 AM

This is slightly off topic, however it still has to do with Vod, so it is probably appropriate to post in this thread, have there ever actually been any examples of the MSDN codes going bad and the seller not honoring their side of the agreement? Or is all of the negative ratings that were left for the MSDN sellers that say the MSDN codes will go bad and that the seller will just disappear nothing more then speculation?

One thing that I have noticed is that scammers with existing negative trust have sold outright non-existent MSDN codes and were able to get their victims to send first because all of the MSDN sellers have negative trust

Nope and that's the whole point... Vod is somebody who miss-uses his green trust to put red on others whenever he "thinks" he is right. He is policing everybody and everything, putting red trust on A LOT of people that never scammed anybody on this forum whenever he feels like it.

There should be a firm rule that states when user post negative trust proof, with screenshots, must be provided.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

This is slightly off topic, however it still has to do with Vod, so it is probably appropriate to post in this thread, have there ever actually been any examples of the MSDN codes going bad and the seller not honoring their side of the agreement? Or is all of the negative ratings that were left for the MSDN sellers that say the MSDN codes will go bad and that the seller will just disappear nothing more then speculation?

One thing that I have noticed is that scammers with existing negative trust have sold outright non-existent MSDN codes and were able to get their victims to send first because all of the MSDN sellers have negative trust

whywefight

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1042

www.explorerz.top

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:51:39 PM

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 01, 2016, 02:47:56 PM

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:39:20 PM

There should be a rule with a temp ban (1 week) if a user gives neg trust without any proof - second strike two weeks - third strike perm ban

This guy is over-doing it:

[img ]https://i.imgur.com/BssiHUu.jpg[/img]

He has some serious personality issues in real life

Why should a troll like him have the power to trash somebodies profile just like that? Mods should take action!

Pfft post's here, just follow the whole thread. And yes there is proof, just read the post...

Anybody that states that MSDN accounts are stolen/cracked does not have ANY clue what he is talking about. NO MSDN ACCOUNTS ARE STOLEN OR CRACKED! They are obtained using the official way Microsoft makes avalable.

Dude read the fucking TOS! Its not allowed to sell those Keys. Because of fucktards selling and buying them people who really purchased those accounts have to deal with stupid rules MS needs to bring up to get rid of sellers....

Ghost55

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vod on February 01, 2016, 02:54:01 PM

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:51:39 PM

Anybody that states that MSDN accounts are stolen/cracked does not have ANY clue what he is talking about. NO MSDN ACCOUNTS ARE STOLEN OR CRACKED! They are obtained using the official way Microsoft makes avalable.

Have your lawyer contact me. You obviously don't have the intelligence.

Peace.

Again:

"On NONE of your neg trusts you give you had personal deals with that user, your risked BTC is ZERO with over 100 neg trusts handed out..... your a troll, a power horny, trust abusing troll, nothing more, nothing less."

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...... all the signs of a major troll

Couldn't fit Januray (yup, this is not even one month) into my screen:

This pic has troll all over it

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:51:39 PM

Anybody that states that MSDN accounts are stolen/cracked does not have ANY clue what he is talking about. NO MSDN ACCOUNTS ARE STOLEN OR CRACKED! They are obtained using the official way Microsoft makes avalable.

Have your lawyer contact me. You obviously don't have the intelligence.

Peace.

Ghost55

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 01, 2016, 02:47:56 PM

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:39:20 PM

There should be a rule with a temp ban (1 week) if a user gives neg trust without any proof - second strike two weeks - third strike perm ban

This guy is over-doing it:

[img ]https://i.imgur.com/BssiHUu.jpg[/img]

He has some serious personality issues in real life

Why should a troll like him have the power to trash somebodies profile just like that? Mods should take action!

Pfft post's here, just follow the whole thread. And yes there is proof, just read the post...

Anybody that states that MSDN accounts are stolen/cracked does not have ANY clue what he is talking about. NO MSDN ACCOUNTS ARE STOLEN OR CRACKED! They are obtained using the official way Microsoft makes avalable.

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Quote from: Ghost55 on February 01, 2016, 02:39:20 PM

There should be a rule with a temp ban (1 week) if a user gives neg trust without any proof - second strike two weeks - third strike perm ban

This guy is over-doing it:

[img ]https://i.imgur.com/BssiHUu.jpg[/img]

He has some serious personality issues in real life

Why should a troll like him have the power to trash somebodies profile just like that? Mods should take action!

Pfft post's here, just follow the whole thread. And yes there is proof, just read the post...
Quoting sho here

Quote from: shorena on January 24, 2016, 07:21:40 AM

Quote from: extracoinrome on January 24, 2016, 07:19:19 AM

I was just wondering if, we would have been given the total freedom to trade and use bitcoins just like the way we are doing today if, some trader(s) on this forum where Satoshi Nakamoto? I'm just saying this out of curiosity because i've noticed the way most trader(s) do throw -gative trust rating! Kiss

Freedom includes the negative rating I gave you, why should it be only your freedom to steal and sell that stolen property and not mine to warn others about your actions?

Ghost55

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vod on February 01, 2016, 02:43:32 PM

You'll notice everyone of my trusts have a reference link attached. The reader can made up their own mind.

Of course I am not over doing it.

On NONE of your neg trusts you give you had personal deals with that user, your risked BTC is ZERO with over 100 neg trusts handed out..... your a troll, a power horny, trust abusing troll, nothing more, nothing less.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

You'll notice everyone of my trusts have a reference link attached. The reader can made up their own mind.

Of course I am not over doing it.

Ghost55

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

There should be a rule with a temp ban (1 week) if a user gives neg trust without any proof - second strike two weeks - third strike perm ban

This guy is over-doing it:

He has some serious personality issues in real life

Why should a troll like him have the power to trash somebodies profile just like that? Mods should take action!

bobobobobo

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Remove Vod,The Trust abuser,The Extortionist.

SavellM

sr. member

Activity: 305

Merit: 250

Vod strikes again...
Seriously this guy... Should have stayed gone!

Give a kid power and he starts wars everywhere be goes.
We should get together and start a petition to remove him. I bet it will get 100's of signatures in the first day.

He just *assumes* everyone is out to get rich. Even when you pay back loans and prove it he doesn't care.

He is A grade a troll and unfortunately been given power, which he abuses.
He is single handedly the most frustrating kid I've ever come across.

I just cannot write how much disgust I have for him...

Surely if you look at all the dedicated post about him abusing his power, SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE!

It's funny I stopped coming to this site because of him, first day back and this is the first thing I see. So bloody sad.
The first page in reputation has vods name in 5 dedicated posts.
@cyrus you have to start to see a link at some bloody point

Mickeyb

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Move On !!!!!!

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 23, 2016, 12:40:29 AM

Like who, quickseller?

Quote from: EcuaMobi on January 19, 2016, 07:17:05 AM

I think the fact he gave the money back should be rewarded somehow. Replacing that negative by a neutral would be a good way.

Quote from: tmfp on January 19, 2016, 07:38:20 AM

I made my feelings clear with the qualified positive trust that I left for Gladimor after actually reading his trading proposal and approach. I know my trust has no weight but I felt it is important to make the point that knee jerk condemning every single investment scheme on here as a scam becomes counter productive in the end.

Vod is backed by himself and who again?

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 23, 2016, 12:40:29 AM

You're on my ignore list for a reason. Should've just kept on ignoring you...

Pfft, we all know you don't have a ignore list. You reply to as many posts as you can for sig payments, at least I accept I do post for signature payments.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Mickeyb on January 22, 2016, 02:01:01 AM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 21, 2016, 06:08:26 PM

Dude, if you started up anything called a "HYIP" on the section of bitcointalk that deals with such beasts, it is absolutely reasonable to make the assumption that you're going to scam. Get over it. Vod is right way more than he's wrong and he's probably right in this case.

Considering the number of trusted people backing the OP, I'd say otherwise

Like who, quickseller?

You're on my ignore list for a reason. Should've just kept on ignoring you...

Mickeyb

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Move On !!!!!!

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 21, 2016, 06:08:26 PM

Dude, if you started up anything called a "HYIP" on the section of bitcointalk that deals with such beasts, it is absolutely reasonable to make the assumption that you're going to scam. Get over it. Vod is right way more than he's wrong and he's probably right in this case.

Considering the number of trusted people backing the OP, I'd say otherwise

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Gladimor on January 19, 2016, 03:54:41 PM

Quote from: Vod on January 19, 2016, 01:48:05 PM

In Canada anyway, the crime is committed once you have the intent to steal. You don't need to walk out of the store, or even past the cash register, to commit shoplifting.

You're not a stupid guy. You knew when you started that eventually you would need to steal from some people - your scam could not run forever. After the crime had been committed you had a change of heart and decided to return all that you had stolen.

If you have such a moral issue with having the word "ponzi" attached to your account, you shouldn't have started one in the first place. It's not something the community should forget about. At your request I was nice enough to indicate you are no longer running the scam. Everything in the trust is fact and not opinion, so it is certainly not trust abuse.

And another issue arises when you assume that I had an intent to steal. That is just another assumption blindly made to back your argument.

I can easily assume many things of you, as well. I can assume that you are leaving negative feedback for all users except for a couple of HYIP operators you have decided to work with. I can assume that you are trying to eliminate all competition for HYIPs that have paid you to be left alone. I can assume many things of you just as you can of me. Issues arise when there is no evidence backing those accusations. In Canada, we also have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms that dictate an individual is "innocent until proven guilty".

Dude, if you started up anything called a "HYIP" on the section of bitcointalk that deals with such beasts, it is absolutely reasonable to make the assumption that you're going to scam. Get over it. Vod is right way more than he's wrong and he's probably right in this case.

Gladimor

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Vod on January 19, 2016, 09:02:32 PM

You had no issues for months with the feedback when it said you were "running a ponzi". Only once you took it down did you harass me to remove the feeedback.

You promised up to 25% weekly return on investments. If you can offer that in your ponzi, AND take home 50% on top of that, why the hell are you here playing with pennies? Go become the richest man in the world.

The bolded part above is all I need to prove you were running a ponzi, and I know the community would not want it forgotten. The trust is how I feel about you, and is not abuse. When you get some proof that I'be being paid to "look the other way", post the negative feedback about me.

In Canada's eyes - you are still innocent until proven guilty. In mine, you were clearly scamming.

I asked you to remove the negative feedback twice while my HYIP was running. You responded to the first message, but ignored the second one.

I was able to achieve returns of 10-25% weekly mainly through Poloniex margin trading, with a side of mining newly launched altcoins and selling them once they got listed on exchanges. Why am I not the richest person in the world and why am I playing with pennies? It's because I don't have the capital.

You don't have evidence that Delta Investments was a ponzi. However, I have evidence that proves that Delta Investments was a legitimate operation that offered returns based on actual trading activity. If you take a look at the original post and scroll down, you'll see various screenshots of Poloniex trading analysis.

And only once did investors get a 25% return in a week, and that was when I made over 26 BTC on FACTOM- over 19 BTC from Poloniex trading, and the other 7 BTC was from arbitrage between Polo and the chinese exchange YuanBaohui.

everaja

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

~ScapeGoat~

Quote from: Quickseller on January 18, 2016, 11:45:28 PM

Vod is someone that pretty rarely fully understands situations when he leaves negative trust (unless it is something obvious like a new user asking for a no-collateral loan), and fairly rarely changes his mind even when he previously had an incomplete set of information.

@OP i am sure You can Negotiate with VOD , how much i know all the bitcoin users are not over bitcointalk.org , and if you close the investment and return the money to investors there is no guarantee that you have returned to all users , may be there will be someone who have not got benefit from your investment after investing.(as in the case of ponzi , last investor looses).
But i really appreciate you for returning the 19 BTC.

Now talking to another Guy , @QS , you yourself don't understand the things , maybe i think you got no job like mexxer-2(saurav) , Sitting over forum and poping then and now to earn some bucks , even i believe you are owner of chalks account , i wonder how can soneone sell me account and blow my cover.
Vod understands the full situation and it is his wish to put or remove the feedback , @OP you need to negotiate to VOD before talking things to public, i am pretty sure VOD is not a bitch like QS , who blocks you on his PM. Wink

Quote from: Quickseller on January 18, 2016, 11:45:28 PM

Vod is on dooglus's trust list and you can ask dooglus to remove Vod from his trust list, however being a scammer himself, I would highly doubt that dooglus will listen to any kind of reason, as dooglus has a history of ignoring reasonable requests regarding his trust list.

Here you see the jealous of a bitch , who wants to get fucked by another dog.(satire)
Vod deserve to be kept in DT and he is in!
I have a job , i need to go , meanwhile the unemployed guys can keep on bitching around.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

You had no issues for months with the feedback when it said you were "running a ponzi". Only once you took it down did you harass me to remove the feeedback.

You promised up to 25% weekly return on investments. If you can offer that in your ponzi, AND take home 50% on top of that, why the hell are you here playing with pennies? Go become the richest man in the world.

The bolded part above is all I need to prove you were running a ponzi, and I know the community would not want it forgotten. The trust is how I feel about you, and is not abuse. When you get some proof that I'be being paid to "look the other way", post the negative feedback about me.

In Canada's eyes - you are still innocent until proven guilty. In mine, you were clearly scamming.

Topic: Issue with Vod - page 2. (Read 3122 times)