In my humble opinion:
- Milan without Ibra is a very weak team, because they are scared or dont have the initiative or the ability to push the team, in few words: Milan without Ibra = nothing, but Ibra can express himself at 100%, team work for him
Ibra can show his better role to force their team-mates going forwards and playing much better. He is confident, and strong but not too much selfish as CR7. I think the transfer of Ibra to Milan and his contributions so far give Milan and Ibra's team-mates a win-win situation. He helped them have better results from his goals and more than that he brought confidence and ambition back to Milan after many seasons.
Seasons later, some young players in Milan will do recognize how he was affected and changed by Ibra. It can be similar to what Zola and Paolo Di Canio changed Premier League and professionality of young players there: the generation of Lampard, Rio Ferdinand, Joe Cole, etc.
Who is the Premier League's best ever Italian player?- Juventus, without CR7.. CR7 is strong, but is marketing operation (CR7 brought a lot of money). Juventus is a well-placed team where the champion can play but cannot express himself at 100% (like Milan) but without CR7 isnt a mess.. him work for team
CR7 is strong, confident and ambitious but his self-esteem can have negative effects on his team-mates. His financial returns from kit-sales are huge and should not be underestimated.
we have 2 options:
- team work for you
- you work for team
which is the better of the two? it depends on the cases, there is no best ever
Do you really think so?
Sometimes it is best if a player works for a team, motivates the team and the team brings back better results as a whole solid entity.
The three musketeers