Topic: It's always about your choice - page 4. (Read 792 times)
If you don't get paid or your payment is incomplete then you can blame bounty hunters for that but if a project failed and not succeed that's not bounty managers fault because team are the one in charge of their projects, getting paid is why we have bounty managers
You should not blame the Bounty manager for all mortal sins, he is not guilty of the failure of the project. Only the team is responsible for the project itself and its development. The manager is responsible for promoting it. His honesty and responsibility to bounty hunters are worth a lot.
that's true and there were some trusted managers were getting fooled by the scam projects and this is not the fault that has already made by the managers. He must try to think if everything is not controlled by the manager. The manager is only doing what already ordered by the team beside try to DYOR before managing the project. 
You should not blame the Bounty manager for all mortal sins, he is not guilty of the failure of the project. Only the team is responsible for the project itself and its development. The manager is responsible for promoting it. His honesty and responsibility to bounty hunters are worth a lot.
that's true and there were some trusted managers were getting fooled by the scam projects and this is not the fault that has already made by the managers. He must try to think if everything is not controlled by the manager. The manager is only doing what already ordered by the team beside try to DYOR before managing the project.
Only useless brains will be think that (MB's fault). If i'm not wrong then every bounty manager disclaimed their self that "they are not part of that specific bounty projects (depends). They are just running that project as a bounty manager. It's hunters own risk to join any bounty projects (about success and payments)." So their is no point to drag them for payment or success that project. You can not earn huge amount money from a single bounty project and not even every projects will be success that you promoted. It's the reality at this moment so it's better be deal with it.
What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about
1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
I believe everyone has a part to play, the bounty manager did his by vetting the project well enough to manage their campaign, it is also hunter's job to which whether to promote the project. Just like you said, the manager can however come in handy by ensuring both the hunters and the team delivers their end of the bargain because is the one that stands as a mediator between the hunters and the project team.
What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about
1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
That was sincerely agreeable and I think this will end up the issue roaming around about some people blaming bounty managers whenever a campaign fails. The job the bounty manager accepted is to maintain the organization of the whole promotion process. The fate of the campaign relies on the team behind the project and the effort of the participants to promote the project which can lead it to the success.
It is indeed that bounty managers have a very good reputation that becomes one of the factor why people choose to get into that project but they have no control on what will be the outcome of the project. Also, at the first place, no one forces you to join the project he manages and it is also your job as a participant to check the background of the project. Your own choice and your own will brought you into joining the project so no one must be blamed especially the bounty managers who were just working on the task given to them and the reason why they are getting paid off.
Humans love to blame others but themselves. I have seen people blame bounty managers for things the bounty manager had no power over, then I think, ‘'Do these bounty hunters know that the bounty managers are not part of the project team?’' Yes, good bounty managers make research to try and promote potential projects. But then again, it’s up to bounty bunter to do their own research too.
Although it could be a factor how the manager chooses the project he'll work for but, it's a true thing that the hands go to the bounty hunters. They're all responsible for choosing the bounty which they think is fair and promising. And that's possible through setting some factors from your own view. The bounty manager's job is to manage the bounty but success actually depends on the developers and how responsible they are for the project.
Even how that project going to be successful, we don't know how long the community survives. Same with the popular coins during 2017-2018, some of them got zero value all over after bearish market resulted to huge market downfalls. Bounty managers has nothing to do with it, they're only working in the beginning but has no contribution after project launch.
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
If a project fails it is not the fault of a bounty manager but if you are planning to market a project then you should understand what they are trying to develop and whether the team members are genuine and they have the knowledge to make things work rather than the aim of just making money in the name of projects. We have seen managers who scam investors by providing false information about the amount of money collected in the name of marketing. 
Well you're right about your points but managing a good project is one of the factor to say the manager is trusted because its part of his job to only manage a not scam campaign, its just a plus point. I know thats its hard to determine if the project is good or not and its bounty hunters job to conduct their own research to know how good the project is but other hunters are also relying to the manager itself for being reputable so they will join because the manager is popular here.
Its always about our own choice there are so many project that is runing now on crypto and as a bounty hunter we need to choose tbe good project to avoid wasting of time, because there are so many scam project that also run in crypto and if we choose the wrong project maybe we cannot earn. The bounty manager is liable by our choice they only play or work thier part so choose wisely.
Something as important is to always have credible project but If you are not sure they could always deliver, bounty manager could request for bitcoin or ethereum as payment. It wont be good if a manager has 40% or more of scam in his record. They should spend as more time doing research on project also reduce the number of bounty at a time. Bounty detective does too many projects at a time even when there are few IEO or ICO in the space.
Very few bounty managers think of their participants. Yahoo62278, Hhampuz. julerz12 used to make agreement to make sure that hunters will get the payment. All the campaign manager should follow the above mamagers and not allow scam project or shit project to evaluate.
No one is going to blame bounty manager for a project that fails, we only blame bounty manager for managing a bad project and wasting the precious time of bounty hunters. It is the work of dev and team to make sure that a project succeed not bounty manager.
true sometimes as good as any bounty. if we are unlucky all are in the project itself because they are distributing rewards to bounty participants and if they are fair they will certainly distribute 100% of the promised allocations but if not I think they will cut back or maybe refuse to pay bounty rewards.
yes I also know about every consequence of joining a bounty project, I mean the risk is in ourselves because we choose the project, join in it, and not the fault of the project manager itself. but the problem is that all of us or even project managers will not know that the projects they manage can actually end in fraud or succeed in the market.
Does it really matter for the manager if the project succeeds or not? He will get paid anyway and most managers get much better deals than the people they later hire for the campaign.
Usuallyt if someone gets the short straw it's the member of the campaign. The manager will get on top anyway, regardless of what you do.
Usuallyt if someone gets the short straw it's the member of the campaign. The manager will get on top anyway, regardless of what you do.
You have stated it just as it is, no matter the reviews everywhere on the forum or the red flags of the project's, it is your call to decide if you will join a Bounty or not, you decide if to trade or not, you decide for yourself.
It is always your call, your choice
That only scratches the surface of the matter. It was our call, our choice but when team or bounty manager start to take abruptly turn and try to scam others. Don't talk about red flags when someone decides to f other because they can and there is nothing help you to foresee it. No, sometimes it wasn't because of our wrong call. It is always your call, your choice
The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.
Are you not aware when writing this. The success of a project is very dependent on the project manager. In fact, many projects managed by trusted managers are successful, see project history starting in 2017, and compare with now.In the past the project was not managed by just anyone, and now everyone manages the project, even relying on newbie accounts to manage the project, and there is no community manager.
The newbie account does not have the slightest risk if the project fails, even the project is his own, just create a website with wordpress and promote it in this forum. Is this what is called a project? How it works. Everyone has responsibilities, managers have a big responsibility for the projects they manage. Do not just manage, the ending, scams.
Can you specify the how the success of a project depends on the bm? How is it the responsibility of the bm if the project succeed or not! Other than managing the campaign by keeping records of all participants and their activities during the bounty campaign and handing over the comprehensive list of participants to the team what else you think the bm will do make a project a success! I can disagree on this because the power of a bm ended in the campaign and there is nothing more he would do.
There are times that a project might look very promising, but the outcome of the bounty might be very bad. Bounty managers are meant to fight the course of the bounty hunters.
If the team of a project decides not to pay or delay payment for no reason, some bounty managers keep mute and allow the team to have their way. Meanwhile, we have seen bounty managers that fought the course of their hunters till the end and always giving updates on the progress of things. I have been privileged to witness these two sides.
If the team of a project decides not to pay or delay payment for no reason, some bounty managers keep mute and allow the team to have their way. Meanwhile, we have seen bounty managers that fought the course of their hunters till the end and always giving updates on the progress of things. I have been privileged to witness these two sides.
I agree that projects fail is not the fault bounty manager, but we ourselves as bounty hunters who must be more careful in choosing projects.
But bounty managers have an obligation to fight for bounty hunters rights, because the only link between bounty hunters and the developer
team projects is a bounty manager. If in the end the project fails, and the price of tokens dump after distribution to bounty hunters indeed
not the fault of the bounty manager.
But bounty managers have an obligation to fight for bounty hunters rights, because the only link between bounty hunters and the developer
team projects is a bounty manager. If in the end the project fails, and the price of tokens dump after distribution to bounty hunters indeed
not the fault of the bounty manager.
Jump to: