Pages:
Author

Topic: It's the end of the world as we know it (but I feel fine)...Mayan zombies itt (Read 2882 times)

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Still waiting for those zombies....or Jesus...or polar shifts...or whatever the crazy people believed.




Actually it was quite near that Solar superstorm was hit Earth in 2012. If the storm had occurred only one week earlier, Earth would have been in the line of fire: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/23jul_superstorm/
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Zombie apocalypse is the worse.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
Still waiting for those zombies....or Jesus...or polar shifts...or whatever the crazy people believed.


legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
What do you think is going to happen on the predicted date: World war? Aliens? Zombie Jesus army? Will you be hiding in your underground doomsday prepper bunker?

I believe just what I see, so for the moment just stoned cannibal zombies and dog-biting zombies going epidemic (when the unwashed masses will wake and discover that all their monies disappearead in the criminal banking black hole):
http://highbrowmagazine.com/1673-man-bites-dog-rise-americas-zombie-laws
I already live in a bunker so no change on my side.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
For instance; you slander the ego for whatever reason, but it is only the ego that has the capacity to make such value-judgements.

From Nietzsche:

Quote
In the first place a being capable of absolutely unegoistic conduct is as fabulous as the phoenix. Such a being is not even thinkable for the very reason that the whole notion of "unegoistic conduct," when closely examined, vanishes into air. Never yet has a man done anything solely for others and entirely without reference to a personal motive; indeed how could he possibly do anything that had no reference to himself, that is without inward compulsion (which must always have its basis in a personal need)? How could the ego act without ego?
Man can act without an ego through love. Your consciousness is functional too, you know.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
bool eval(bool b){return b ? b==true : b==false;}
You can't hate and love at the same time.
^^^ Clearly has never had a girlfriend. ^^^
Obviously deduced by pure experience without any use of logic.
Which is good, as applying too much logic on a girlfriend might break her.
That usually feels like "It's the end of the world as we know it".
Making it back to topic ... uhm ... what did I want here?

p.s.
The opposite of love is indifference as it is of hate.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
I predict lots of late-September 2013 babies.
"There may be no tomorrow, so how about tonight," eh?  Wink
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
I predict lots of late-September 2013 babies.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
For instance; you slander the ego for whatever reason, but it is only the ego that has the capacity to make such value-judgements.

From Nietzsche:

Quote
In the first place a being capable of absolutely unegoistic conduct is as fabulous as the phoenix. Such a being is not even thinkable for the very reason that the whole notion of "unegoistic conduct," when closely examined, vanishes into air. Never yet has a man done anything solely for others and entirely without reference to a personal motive; indeed how could he possibly do anything that had no reference to himself, that is without inward compulsion (which must always have its basis in a personal need)? How could the ego act without ego?
hero member
Activity: 547
Merit: 531
First bits: 12good
Will any bookies accept bets on this issue? I'm gonna put all my money on the world not ending...
Bet there :
http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=811


Haha crazy bets Smiley How you gonna take the money if the world ends  Grin
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
There is nothing without the 'ego'; it is impossible to conceptualize anything without the ego as any attempt to do so would be only vanity. Using the ego to judge the ego-- not a disinterested nor objective judgement/perspective whatsoever
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
You can't hate and love at the same time.

^^^ Clearly has never had a girlfriend. ^^^

LOL  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
You can't hate and love at the same time.

^^^ Clearly has never had a girlfriend. ^^^
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
You can't hate and love at the same time.

False.

I love my car because it rewards me with freedom.
I hate my car because it's a massive drain on money.
So which is it, do you hate your car or love it?  You cannot be happy and sad at the same time.  You cannot be greedy and sharing at the same time.  It's not about why you feel a certain way, it's about which way you feel.

Both. I love and hate my car at same time. Your statement is false.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
You can't hate and love at the same time.

False.

I love my car because it rewards me with freedom.
I hate my car because it's a massive drain on money.
So which is it, do you hate your car or love it?  You cannot be happy and sad at the same time.  You cannot be greedy and sharing at the same time.  It's not about why you feel a certain way, it's about which way you feel.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
You can't hate and love at the same time.

False.

I love my car because it rewards me with freedom.
I hate my car because it's a massive drain on money.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
Ego is the source of all things negative.  Ego is the concept of self.  Greed.

If 'ego' is the concept of self, that is, to an extent, a 'source' of negativity, but it's debated as to whether or not the self creates negativity, merely experiences it from an external object, or can even be perceived as 'willed' negativity-- or perhaps deterministic 'negativity' that, if it is inevitable, cannot be of much of a 'negativity' in-itself, for why moralize destined phenomenons at all?

What I'm really saying here is this: You cannot appear very philosophical when your 'truths' are merely vague cliches-- so presumptuous and broad that your thoughts all amount to superficiality.
What do you not understand?  When you dream, everything is one, together, it's your consciousness.  Life is divided, we function as humans with our ego.  Ego is what makes us human, it's doubt, it's reason, it's fear.  It's everything but love.

You can't hate and love at the same time.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
Will any bookies accept bets on this issue? I'm gonna put all my money on the world not ending...

Why not bet with Mr.Dank? He's very sure of himself. Though I doubt he'll put his money where his mouth is; he's extremely unstable and misguided.
hero member
Activity: 898
Merit: 1000
Will any bookies accept bets on this issue? I'm gonna put all my money on the world not ending...
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Ego is the source of all things negative.  Ego is the concept of self.  Greed.

If 'ego' is the concept of self, that is, to an extent, a 'source' of negativity, but it's debated as to whether or not the self creates negativity, merely experiences it from an external object, or can even be perceived as 'willed' negativity-- or perhaps deterministic 'negativity' that, if it is inevitable, cannot be of much of a 'negativity' in-itself, for why moralize destined phenomenons at all?

What I'm really saying here is this: You cannot appear very philosophical when your 'truths' are merely vague cliches-- so presumptuous and broad that your thoughts all amount to superficiality.




Pages:
Jump to: