Topic: ITTY BITTY EXCHANGE - page 2. (Read 7017 times)

Get onto the page and message randoms and ask them? It will become self evident from their responses that we haven't bought any likes and they are organic.

Or just read all the reviews? There's too many from too long established Facebook users to be a scam.

The only negative one we've had was were someone left a 0/5 by accident despite leaving positive words. We've tried to contact her but haven't had a response yet.

BitBot

How can someone verify that and why is it relevant to verify such thing ? Should we also verify that all the eggs following your twitter account are all good ?

Visit our Facebook page.

Itty Bitty Exchange

Plenty of people there leaving reviews. Contact them yourselves.



Over 5000 likes and none of them bought. Easily verifiable.

BitBot

PS I love how you accuse us of being sleazy Peter, when you're the one with the poor reputation flags next to your name - what does it say? "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

You did not actually answer any of the questions, you just spun a bunch of sleazy crap.

Maybe you do not understand how the trust system works here? Nobody who has been questioning you shows up as negative trust to me. I see Moderate is accused of scamming 1000000 bitcoins, but clearly that is just somebody upset about him calling out scams. Nobody trusts what the scammer says, so that rating does not show up in his trust rating.

"Making statements about our marketing person without even knowing anything about them" That is correct, we don't know anything about your marketing person, or anybody else on your "board". That is the point we are trying to make: you need to tell us more about yourself before we will trust you with anything.

"we are getting excellent business that far surpasses our expectations" ... You expected nobody to fall for this and you are suprised to be getting some traffic? Or maybe this is just a lie to try to convince people that it must be safe since other people are already using it?

I've already responded but it appears the answers weren't read or ignored.

Let me re-iterate: I will discuss with the board at our next meeting what has been asked. If they vote to disclose, then we will.

No point responding to trolls. They've made up their mind. Nasty, rude and clearly one of them is a scammer accusing us of being scammers? Making statements about our marketing person without even knowing anything about them short of a few posts on a forum? Then tell us who you say.. Once again, I'm not in a position to share yet.

Good for them. No matter, we are already getting excellent business that far surpasses our expectations.

Anyone else, you are most welcome to use our service. You will find that we are not scammers. But I do encourage to judge for yourself.

Regards

BitBot

Has anyone tested it?

Right. Ignores the relevant questions, makes various vague assurances about "our research" and "our team", and stuffs in calls to action aimed at noobs.

You're officially in scammer territory. Get lost.

We are currently running a 50% off fees promotion on our Facebook page. Please PM me for a code!

So far all I've seen is that there is some marketing guy in your team, definitively not a guru one. By now he should've been smart enough to either give you quality fake names to fill all your entire fake board or convince you to fully announce all the team.

You (or your marketing guy) realized that bitcoin projects commonly lack people with real name behind them, and there is opportunity for doing that differently for gaining credibility. Guess what ? You failed to achieve that.

How would it be giving a competitor an advantage to say the names of the individuals behind this? You put up a whole lot of text without actually answering the questions asked.

This sounds fishy, and you are not making yourself sound any less fishy by typing prodigious amounts of sleazy marketing bullshit.

Very interesting.

Thank you LaudaM

BitBot.

We are in no way shape or form associated with inputs.io.

As far as verification, we are happy to build our reputation slowly and reliably. If the board elect to share information about themselves then we shall do so.

In the interim,

If you choose to do business with us, you wont be disappointed.

If you choose not to, you might be.

BitBot.

Is this verifiable ?


That is very easy to achieve, see what your fellow at Australia from inputs.io did. You just get some paid news about you, take the chance to say you are the most secure exchange, and whatever else fits like liquidity, fastest, and so on.


Again your fellow Australian from inputs.io ruined any value that could possibly add.

These are fair questions. I will go back to our board and ask them what information we can divulge.

In the interim, I can tell you this so far: We are funded by some private high profile investors in Australia.

There was extensive business planning performed from SWOT to exit strategy. Our risk assessment analysis was quite detailed.

During the planning stage, we engaged international taxation lawyers and corporate advisors in each of the jurisdictions we were assessing for potential trade. Part of our due diligence process involved officially contacting the relevant government bodies in each country we are operating in, outlining our business plan to them and asking what  their stance was on licensing. Some countries treat us simply as merchants. Others require licensing or at least an application to be lodged. Others like the USA are more stringent.

This is why we have rolled out in some countries but not in others. We are timing our spot type exchange release for around the time periods these licenses manifest. Or at least, the majority of them.


Our board possesses a great deal of commercial experience. There is a lawyer, an accountant, a very high profile marketing guru and all of the major shareholders own highly successful businesses.

As for WoT, we did not feel it relevant to our size of business however we recognize its importance to smaller traders. Our market research has indicated that the average person will not use WoT.

One of our major goals is to bring BTC to the masses. Our marketing campaign will reflect that. Believe me when I say that our branding is going to be prominent in the mainstream market's collective mind when thinking of BTC and virtual currency.

Our reputation will become self evident quite quickly. We wont let you down and know that to do so will have far reaching ramifications for us.

We recognize the importance of looking after all of you and will do so to the best of our ability.

We will be joining the BitCoin foundation this week.

I welcome all of your questions and will answer them where I feel we are not offering anything commercial in confidence or giving a competitor an advantage. 

BitBot

User   Date   Risked BTC amount   Reference   Comments
Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย 9: -0 / +17(17)   2013-08-15   1.00000000   Reference   Lost and or scammed a lot of BTC from the community. I would not trust this guy with my funds again.
Yes it does.

Cute robot. See here.

Huh? What I see for myself is:

What does it matter who is asking the questions? I have been burned in the past, so now I am a bit skeptical of anonymous people who want to collect all our money.

You're the right person to speak of trust. 

Who are you?

Why should we trust you to hold our money?

Are the other posters in this thread your sock-puppets?

Why is there no contact information on your website?

Who is this "we" you keep mentioning on your website? Is this run by a team of people or just one guy hiding in his parents' basement?

Are you in the WoT?

How do we know your website is secure?

Do you have money-transmitting licenses from the governments of the areas in which you operate?

Who ARE you???

Will you trade alts?