Pages:
Author

Topic: @james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason (Read 1365 times)

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
You can leave comments on a person's profile by leaving neutral ratings
Yes you can but bout what ? why you think this person could be a scammer or why you trust him but not for posting.Like i said in the other thread ,in some days people here are going to Tag ratings saying "he was arguing with his neighbor or he was not treating his wife right etc..etc.."

However, a neutral is acceptable to some extent but none others.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
Why would he worry

Instincts.

if he had done nothing wrong.
Who will say ?

First of all there is no "HateLeague" it was a joke
So , Joke with ratings ?  

the trust page is not the place to say so.
This is True.But, sadly we don't have any other weapon ?
I suppose remaining silent just wasn't an option in a matter as urgent as my post quality.

OP.  Comments yes.  Relating to TRUST.  What don't you get about that?

You can leave comments on a person's profile by leaving neutral ratings, neutral ratings dont affect trust scores, what is your problem?
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
Why would he worry

Instincts.

if he had done nothing wrong.
Who will say ?

First of all there is no "HateLeague" it was a joke
So , Joke with ratings ?  

the trust page is not the place to say so.
This is True.But, sadly we don't have any other weapon ?
I suppose remaining silent just wasn't an option in a matter as urgent as my post quality.

OP.  Comments yes.  Relating to TRUST.  What don't you get about that?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Move On !!!!!!
@james.lent remove your negative rating at once, this is abuse, negative ratings should be made for the following reasons

Quote
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
Quote
NotLambchop Huh: -1 / +2   2014-11-19   0.00000000      The forum's biggest troll... thats right.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=18640

Plentiful of other examples given for trolling if anyone wants

James.Lent is not in DefaultTrust , their ratings don't affect your trust. Trust system is not moderated, move on or find a compromise with him
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0
lol, i dont care about my netflix account sales as the accounts i got were free and all i lost nothing in the end
@pharmacist how am i biased agains signature campaigns? am i not in one myself?


I have signatures turned off so I didn't notice you had one, but in either case if you don't like the quality of my posts, the trust page is not the place to say so.  Unless I hear different from a moderator.
Actually, the trust page is the place for comments, comments have to be neutral

@james.lent remove your negative rating at once, this is abuse, negative ratings should be made for the following reasons

Quote
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
Why would he worry

Instincts.

if he had done nothing wrong.
Who will say ?

First of all there is no "HateLeague" it was a joke
So , Joke with ratings ?  

the trust page is not the place to say so.
This is True.But, sadly we don't have any other weapon ?
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0
lol, i dont care about my netflix account sales as the accounts i got were free and all i lost nothing in the end
@pharmacist how am i biased agains signature campaigns? am i not in one myself?


I have signatures turned off so I didn't notice you had one, but in either case if you don't like the quality of my posts, the trust page is not the place to say so.  Unless I hear different from a moderator.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
Invalid, You don't seem to agree with your Personal Text ?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0
lol, i dont care about my netflix account sales as the accounts i got were free and all i lost nothing in the end
@pharmacist how am i biased agains signature campaigns? am i not in one myself?

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1042
www.explorerz.top
@james.lent left me negative trust calling me a troll, refference is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0;topicseen

He is asking for source files for files created as far back as 6 years ago and a member of his hateleague is also in his thread asking someone to show proof of identity

First of all there is no "HateLeague" it was a joke used as referal for whiney people like you. We are not Illuminati... I dont get why you not understand if someone says he have done something and post screens (or other stuff), user will wonder when they find that stuff on wikipedia.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

Am i the one who posted googled pics claiming to be mine? Posting his identity as in editing his wiki post. No one asked for his damn address. Now drop the trolling efforts as it only shows how immature you are. Either that or you're an alt of Legenster
No you are the one leaving negative trust without proof that the images arent his, did you talk to him about this prior to leaving the feedback? or are you a shoot first, ask questions later kind of guy?

Also, how long ago were the wiki posts made?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

Am i the one who posted googled pics claiming to be mine? Posting his identity as in editing his wiki post. No one asked for his damn address. Now drop the trolling efforts as it only shows how immature you are. Either that or you're an alt of Legenster
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
You can start with your age, sex and location
19, male, continental europe
wanna make out?

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 510
Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target
Then maybe he shouldn't have used an image created by Gilles Tran as reference of his work and post it in his thread?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
Pages:
Jump to: