A false flag? What? Do you even know what the words you use mean?
http://www.yourdictionary.com/false-flag"false-flag
Noun
(plural false flags)
(nautical) A ruse, in the days of sail, in which an attacking ship would fly the colours of its enemy until close enough to open fire.
(espionage, military) A diversionary or propaganda tactic of deceiving an adversary into thinking that an operation was carried out by another party."
So your theory is Jim Acosta is an undercover Republican operative sent to discredit CNN and the Democrat party? Mmmmmk.
Why don't you make it absolutely clear and source the exact image you claim is doctored.
>the deception creates the appearance of a particular party, group, or nation being responsible for some activity, disguising the actual source of responsibility.
We're talking about the guy committing "violence" rather than presidential silencing of press. It's a pretty good disguise.
The best part is the "violence" was doctored footage, which "was sped up, but not doctored" according to the whitehouse.
Speeding up the video "is" changing the footage.
Even if what you are claiming were true, this still doesn't make it a false flag. Learn how to use words, then debate. Also, once again, source the image you are claiming is doctored. Not an article the image might be in, the URL to the image itself.
Uhhh, okay buddy.
One: It's not my claim, it's the claim of the whitehouse spokesperson that the footage was "sped up".
Two: My usage of "false flag" is perfectly fine in this sense. The whole "karate chop" distracts from the fact the president told an individual member of the press to "shut up". If we had a "presidential" president, they'd have calmly let the reporter talk, say "no comment" or rebuke the statement factually.
Instead we had a whining baby cry that they shouldn't have the right to speak. The baby didn't like what he heard to he ended up taking away their right to speak to him.
Again, we're not even talking about the president silencing a reporter; which was the whole point of the whitehouse speeding up the footage is to make Jim Acosta seem like the "violent bad guy" rather than the "silenced journalist".
It's a pretty sad state of affairs of easy the "right" forgets that "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" is something the government CANNOT infringe upon.
'BUT MAH 3RD PARTY PROVIDERS MUTED MY CHAN' -- guess what, that's not a government entity bucko.
