Privacy could not exists, because it is something imaginary. People should not do what they want (especially when we are talking about money (digital or not)).
How is privacy imaginary? And why shouldn't people do what they want?
Because they shouldn't. That's why we have laws. Do you actually think that the governments will allow us to move billions (in the future, maybe trillions) of $, without them to know? That would be disaster... Someone once said that the separate people are smart, but the masses are dumb.
Can you please post images of your last three months of bank statements? This is the equivalent of Bitcoin - everyone having access to everyone else's financial records.
As well, government is not some perfect benevolent daddy figure - it's an institution filled with corruptible and fallible humans. Are you also ok with the notion of government having live cameras in your home at all times and police coming to do 'body searches' of you and your family at unannounced hours? We must not accept tyranny, and thanks to technology we won't have to.
Call me a spelunker, but I'm not holding funds in banks since like 5-6 years. I am generally poor and all I have is in my pockets (or in a jar under my mattress). I get what you mean, but it seems that you are not seeing my point here. People (at some point) must be controlled. That is what I think.
People must be controlled?
That sounds like an illuminati/globalistic statement. Perhaps I am reading it wrong?