John Mcafee was already unbelievable, because most of what John McAfee said was a lie. I have no respect for John Mcafee has since
he promoted shitcoins. Now he is lying again saying he knows the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. I think John Mcafee just want to get
attention, we all should not respond to anything John Mcafee says. Let him be delusional.
Topic: John McAfee says he received call from Satoshi Nakamoto asking not to be reveal - page 3. (Read 955 times)
May 06, 2020, 06:53:58 PM
May 06, 2020, 06:51:52 PM
Right after Craight Wright now it's John Mcafee. Is really becoming a billionaire gives you a lot of free time to troll the Bitcoin community.
If he truly knows the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto then he should tell the whole world and provide evidence. I wonder if he's just a cryptocurrency hater or bought Bitcoin's at a wrong time or sold it and got rekt.
If he truly knows the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto then he should tell the whole world and provide evidence. I wonder if he's just a cryptocurrency hater or bought Bitcoin's at a wrong time or sold it and got rekt.
May 06, 2020, 05:54:32 PM
Soon we'll hear that it was CSW calling and he changed his mind and wants to be revealed now. 
If you want to be shown as the new Satoshi you just have to send enough money to John because his head always turns in the direction from which the smell of money is coming from
For real, John is taking much coke again
If you want to be shown as the new Satoshi you just have to send enough money to John because his head always turns in the direction from which the smell of money is coming from
For real, John is taking much coke again
May 06, 2020, 04:12:54 PM
Honestly, I'm a little confused to feel comforted or sad to see how John McAfee always makes himself up in this crypto world.
Right what @nicecrypto stated:
Every time he makes a new statement, surely that statement will be up and he will become famous and remembered for all time. And when we talk about it again and again, he will be happy.
Let him with his own opinion and imagination. To be sure, I personally do not believe if Satoshi Nakamoto called him. It is too risky for Satoshi to make a call to anyone. Especially if he is afraid he will be revealed by the government and everyone, of course, this will harm and risk him. Because of that, why did he make a call? Doesn't he know if someone might be able to track the location of the call? Therefore, I think this is only John McAfee's imagination.
Right what @nicecrypto stated:
Well John McAfee will always be who he is, nobody can change that,
Every time he makes a new statement, surely that statement will be up and he will become famous and remembered for all time. And when we talk about it again and again, he will be happy.
Let him with his own opinion and imagination. To be sure, I personally do not believe if Satoshi Nakamoto called him. It is too risky for Satoshi to make a call to anyone. Especially if he is afraid he will be revealed by the government and everyone, of course, this will harm and risk him. Because of that, why did he make a call? Doesn't he know if someone might be able to track the location of the call? Therefore, I think this is only John McAfee's imagination.
In the first place, why would Satoshi call him? For what reason? I don't see any strong reason why would he do that. There is no advantage of doing so instead he will be taking his risk to even just communicate with this person because he is a big mouth. For sure, it is one of the scammers posing Satoshi, and trying to get his attention, maybe for his own personal agenda.
May 06, 2020, 04:02:25 PM
Honestly, I'm a little confused to feel comforted or sad to see how John McAfee always makes himself up in this crypto world.
Right what @nicecrypto stated:
Every time he makes a new statement, surely that statement will be up and he will become famous and remembered for all time. And when we talk about it again and again, he will be happy.
Let him with his own opinion and imagination. To be sure, I personally do not believe if Satoshi Nakamoto called him. It is too risky for Satoshi to make a call to anyone. Especially if he is afraid he will be revealed by the government and everyone, of course, this will harm and risk him. Because of that, why did he make a call? Doesn't he know if someone might be able to track the location of the call? Therefore, I think this is only John McAfee's imagination.
Right what @nicecrypto stated:
Well John McAfee will always be who he is, nobody can change that,
Every time he makes a new statement, surely that statement will be up and he will become famous and remembered for all time. And when we talk about it again and again, he will be happy.
Let him with his own opinion and imagination. To be sure, I personally do not believe if Satoshi Nakamoto called him. It is too risky for Satoshi to make a call to anyone. Especially if he is afraid he will be revealed by the government and everyone, of course, this will harm and risk him. Because of that, why did he make a call? Doesn't he know if someone might be able to track the location of the call? Therefore, I think this is only John McAfee's imagination.
May 06, 2020, 03:41:13 PM
I believe that John McAfee might actually think he knows who Satoshi is. I also think it's a good reason that person John talked to provided to stay anonymous (I would've said the same thing). And this person is probably one of the early adopters or even developers.
John "Crazy" McAfee said the exact same things a while ago and he just wants to be on the main news all the time just like some maniacs in the crypto space who have extensive criminal records trying to be a part of the revolutionary market, the best solution is to avoid these crazy media maniacs and stop promoting them and their lies.Mcafee really continues to become a shit after promoting shitcoins.
The exact reason he comes up with stupid stuff all the time, he just want to be relevant. 
May 06, 2020, 01:49:13 PM
Mcafee really continues to become a shit after promoting shitcoins. Now turning a pigshit to grasp for relevance. All the things he touches turns to shit from his antivirus to this dex.
10 years passed. Even if they found out who satoshi is, would it make BTC not a working asset?
May 06, 2020, 01:09:21 PM
everyone knows here that we can't take this guy serious nowadays.
And what you've got as a result is a topic with post after post of people trying to find a slightly different way to say exactly that.
If we're being honest with ourselves, that's not really a "discussion", now is it? At this stage, there isn't much more that can be said about John Mcafee that wasn't said the first 50 times he said something absurd. I strongly encourage locking the thread because it's just going to devolve into another spammy megathread with no worthwhile content.
May 06, 2020, 12:54:31 PM
Solution: Stop reading crappy cryptomedia bloggers who constantly scrape the barrel with the latest demented ramblings because they're incapable of producing content of a decent quality about anything remotely important.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
I subscribe for every word you said. This also regards to any existing media, especially those that exist in written form. True media, even the ones that used to be reliable, understand that their time has passed and all cling to dear life using clickbait-ish tactics. Good for views in the short term, deadly in the long run
May 06, 2020, 12:53:36 PM
Solution: Stop reading crappy cryptomedia bloggers who constantly scrape the barrel with the latest demented ramblings because they're incapable of producing content of a decent quality about anything remotely important.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
Damn, I was just sharing it here so we can create some discussion and talk about it, everyone knows here that we can't take this guy serious nowadays.
May 06, 2020, 12:45:04 PM
Solution: Stop reading crappy cryptomedia bloggers who constantly scrape the barrel with the latest demented ramblings because they're incapable of producing content of a decent quality about anything remotely important.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
And, more importantly, if you do still feel compelled to waste your own braincells continuing to read that crap, definitely DON'T share it here on these forums. The "source" of this so-called "article" is basically worthless. Stop giving them free publicity which they clearly don't deserve.
Think carefully about what you're doing. Even if they were a credible publication, if they see they're getting hits from stories like this because people share it without thinking it through, they're naturally going to assume it's something people want to read and keep publishing more crap just like it.
Please do your part in restoring people's faith in media. Share GOOD articles from REPUTABLE sources.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 06, 2020, 10:36:44 AM
Really? How did he know that the call he received was from Satoshi Nakamoto? Did that person give the proves that he was the real Satoshi Nakamoto? LOL 
I hope that he is not in a dream. But nevermind, I consider it is a joke for me
I hope that he is not in a dream. But nevermind, I consider it is a joke for me
May 06, 2020, 09:44:29 AM
Just leave him alone. You know how old retired people mumble nonsense and people neither pay attention to what they say nor being offended with that nonsense. Same is with John. The grandpa is 74 already and he is just playing with public to get attention 
May 06, 2020, 08:53:04 AM
It's a good thing to see that everyone here in the thread doesn't believe on what John McAfee is telling online, did the whole industry adjusted and know what news to believe and what news to disregard? Or does everyone in the market now knows that McAfee until now hasn't said a single word of truth in his mouth? I think it is the latter I still see a lot of people easily get carried away with catchy news however with the majority of the posts showing negative comments against McAfee all I can say that this is a start for people here to see who to believe and to avoid.
May 06, 2020, 08:39:24 AM
Really? again? He is saying that is about to reveal who Satoshi is, DÉJÀ VU, I've saw this so many times.
John McAfee said he not only knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is but he received a call from the creator of Bitcoin asking that his name not be revealed for fear of complications with the government and his personal safety.
Source:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-mcafee-knows-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is
I believe that John McAfee might actually think he knows who Satoshi is. I also think it's a good reason that person John talked to provided to stay anonymous (I would've said the same thing). And this person is probably one of the early adopters or even developers. All that, of course, doesn't mean that it's Satoshi at all. I think that whoever this person of McAfee is, it's not the real Satoshi. Or, taking into consideration what avikz pointed out, maybe there was no call and no person, it's just McAfee's hallucinatory friend. Just checked out his Twitter and couldn't find anything that crazy, but I was surprised to see a post about Ukrainian (I'm from Ukraine, and it's definitely not the language people usually study). John McAfee said he not only knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is but he received a call from the creator of Bitcoin asking that his name not be revealed for fear of complications with the government and his personal safety.
Source:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-mcafee-knows-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is
May 06, 2020, 08:17:09 AM
Quote
he received a call from the creator of Bitcoin asking that his name not be revealed for fear of complications with the government and his personal safety.
Meh, just sounds like crazy John is hearing voices in his head again... 
May 06, 2020, 08:12:52 AM
He is just probably adding some sauce to the upcoming halving and just to be kind of relevant these days. Who would believe on this guys who was arrested last year that is found having a high caliber of guns and ammunition, arrested for illegal entering a country back in 2012 and a person of interest for murder committed in the same year? Just don't believe on everything he says unless he has a solid proof coz John McAfee is as questionable as aliens.
May 06, 2020, 07:54:36 AM
Really? again? He is saying that is about to reveal who Satoshi is, DÉJÀ VU, I've saw this so many times.
John McAfee said he not only knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is but he received a call from the creator of Bitcoin asking that his name not be revealed for fear of complications with the government and his personal safety.
Source:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-mcafee-knows-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is
John McAfee said he not only knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is but he received a call from the creator of Bitcoin asking that his name not be revealed for fear of complications with the government and his personal safety.
Source:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-mcafee-knows-who-satoshi-nakamoto-is
Previously, McAfee announced that he would reveal the true identity of Satoshi but later retracted it. He said he rejected the idea because it would endanger the real life of Satoshi Nakamoto. Governments, criminal elements, and even digital currency enthusiasts will rush to him, which will eventually become a security concern for his life.
May 06, 2020, 07:46:41 AM
John McAfee is one of the comic crypto currency trader and influencer we have in this space, when he talks like this, it's just to joke off his many ordeals from the government and not to be taken serious. There was a time he was to review he Satsohi was last year, but he made a U-turn, he neither know Satoshi nor has he ever receive call from him.
May 06, 2020, 07:04:17 AM
In a thick Russian accent: THAT'S BULLSHIT because I didn't tell nobody who I am 
This Satoshi Nakamoto delirium wouldn't stop tho and no cure is effective to control its spread...
This Satoshi Nakamoto delirium wouldn't stop tho and no cure is effective to control its spread...
Jump to: