On the other hand, if he gave a negative trust to someone who really deserved it
no , not all the people deserve it
But that's the whole point
That's what I'm trying to tell you exactly. It may well be true that not all the people that he painted red deserve it, but that doesn't make the whole idea any more valid and legitimate on this account. If even just one member fully deserved to be given red trust and he votes against Pharmacist, that instantly renders the whole poll invalid, null and void, end of story. This doesn't mean that he is not butthurt or didn't abuse the trust system or whatever (honestly, I don't know), this just shows why such polls are inherently useless and meaningless
What is this thread doing here?
Shouldn't it be in Meta?
Being someone accused of writing high number lengthy irrelevant posts ,you at least should know how the boards in forum work.Meta == Something related to forum Reputation == Something related to a person/service.Either way I guess you're back
If you have issues with the quality of my posts (as well as their quantity, for that matter), fire up a separate thread somewhere and we will discuss it there. I dare you to make such an accusation yourself (don't hide behind passive tenses). As simple as it gets (and don't forget to include links to my posts which you consider irrelevant, meaningless, or just outright spammy)