You have a lot of positive references to your good work in your reviews. Do you consider those people less important than another forum member who left you a negative review?
Fact is I am still surviving because of those feedback I earned though my contribution to the forum, these are approval from people for the years of contribution I have in the community. I believe feedback system should be organic.
But these negative feedback from JollyGood are not organic. It's about his personal dis-likeness and he expressed by using these feedback. Something that came out from his personal dis-likeness is hurting my business which I am conducting with the HIGHEST standard (no one can question the quality of conducting the campaigns I have). The monthly transaction volume of my business is minimum $25K, yearly minimum $300K but still I get reasons like "We are not going with someone who have negative reputation". It's not fault of these new people, the potential clients who are overlooking others feedback. They see all but when they see the negative one, obviously it creates a doubt in their mind, that doubt leads a change of mind. I am not saying I will have every projects that launch in the community, the other managers are as good as me if not better than me but when a project miss out of hand just because of the reason of having negative feedback, it's hard to take.
Feedback system especially the negative feedback is not to use against someone who you don't like. You can give a positive feedback to anyone you like, it does not harm but a negative feedback can have many negative consequences and one should not just give it when he does not go alone with others.
There are no question JollyGood is not comfortable with me. It's not complex to understand why he left these negative feedback. It's not just me, you will discover majority of his negative feedback are towards the people he does not go comfortable. Is this a good reason to have him in your trust list?
this has been working since the conflict with The Cryptovator, and this may be your main problem with other users who have given you red tags.
Conflict with with The Cryptovator, is it about TMAN leaving negative feedback to Best_change because they did not have an escrow? Do you see defending them was a wrong reason at that time?
Look where is Best_change now. They needed this defense from someone (I am glad I was there for them) or they were not here now. If I was joining TMAN and how JollyGood reacts, then Best_change would be destroyed so far and you were not wearing their signature today.
It's easy to support a positive reason but before supporting a negative reason, one really needs to consider so many unthinkable consequences especially when it is about a business. A business is not just a living tool of one person, many people depends on it. If Best_Change was ruined at that time, then thousands of people currently who are depending on them now would have different story.