Pages:
Author

Topic: JOSHUA ZIPKINS THE MAN WHO DDOS'd BTCTALK!!!! - page 2. (Read 5083 times)

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
His social security number being posted was mainly just a way to prove the person had private information noone else had.
That's some pretty terrible logic then. "Here is a string of numbers no one else has, in order to verify the information." By the virtue of having information no one else has, no one else can verify it.

FYI, the SSN posted for Joshua Zipkin is not his personal SSN. Its the business EIN. A corporate SSN if you will. Its for AMT. Considering it was tied to the bank account it makes sense in this case. I checked it out. Its invalid now as he has folded the business up. But still shows in my sources record.

So yea this was valid information. Having it did not compromise his personal info whatsoever as this was the corporations "SSN".
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
In what comes as no surprise to me the letter containing an order from the judge that has been sent to zipkin has been returned a 4th time. This was even after he provided an updated address.

I'd like to see him get hit with contempt of court. Even if it's civil contempt he could be placed in jail for the remainder of the trial. And since he seems to have no intention to responding to the court on schedule if at all. I think jailing him during the proceedings is fitting because it ensures he is present.

Which goes to a level of willing to Fook with forum as he just seems to ignore any legal requirements. Nothing to lose right? Someone needs to track his whereabouts and I would suggest getting on Marto74 tail. He is likely hanging out with scam buddy. Maybe he roped Marto into this hack as well.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.
The problem here is if people are going to ask about theymos identity, then it also stands to reason that one must also ask why satoshi must also hide his identity. We have seen time and time again those hiding their identity ultimately are hiding something. If the overarching question is transparency here, then the forum mods would need to show some even if they choose not to reveal their identities.

Not sure that's a real issue. What does satoshi have to do with theymos? Are you trying to suggest something else with this "problem"?
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Mmmh mhmhh mmmm.
That's some pretty terrible logic then. "Here is a string of numbers no one else has, in order to verify the information." By the virtue of having information no one else has, no one else can verify it.

Uh, what about the person whose SSN it is? Or did they forget and not want that info expunged?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
His social security number being posted was mainly just a way to prove the person had private information noone else had.
That's some pretty terrible logic then. "Here is a string of numbers no one else has, in order to verify the information." By the virtue of having information no one else has, no one else can verify it.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
Just a regular guy who likes his fiber.
In what comes as no surprise to me the letter containing an order from the judge that has been sent to zipkin has been returned a 4th time. This was even after he provided an updated address.

I'd like to see him get hit with contempt of court. Even if it's civil contempt he could be placed in jail for the remainder of the trial. And since he seems to have no intention to responding to the court on schedule if at all. I think jailing him during the proceedings is fitting because it ensures he is present.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
The problem here is if people are going to ask about theymos identity, then it also stands to reason that one must also ask why satoshi must also hide his identity. We have seen time and time again those hiding their identity ultimately are hiding something. If the overarching question is transparency here, then the forum mods would need to show some even if they choose not to reveal their identities.

Guys like Joshua Zipkin who kept their identities hidden and try to suppress information, are people who need to be taken down. Right now the topic has veered toward discussing theymos, when the issue is really about Joshua Zipkin's possible role in this hack. He had a major seething hatred for this forum (presumably still does) and various people here (I am on that list as well as is evidenced by his irrational posts at me).

His social security number being posted was mainly just a way to prove the person had private information noone else did. My guess based on her name that it was his exwife or someone else close to him that he screwed over. But considering his actions against us could not happen to a nicer guy. Law enforcements lack of action despite the numerous reports to them has forced us to get the press involved and use social justice to put these guys in their place. Least if they won't get prosecuted, then their reputations are so smeared from their frauds and scams, that they can never pull that shit again easily. Shaming law enforcement seeing as we are basically doing their job for them is another avenue as well.

The forum serves that purpose at least. As much as we want to do more, its best to just expose the information that is legally obtainable and accessible. Chat logs and other freely shared personal details are fair game. I personally am not ok with sharing things like SSNs and bank accounts. But honestly if someone wants to put themselves out there for that thats on them.

At any rate there is a shitton of evidence to nail Joshua Zipkin to the wall for other things besides the hacking. He likley did pay someone for this. Another blockchain analysis might need to be checked to see where the money went based on Joshua Zipkin's current known wallets.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
I may or may not possess proof that theymos is in his mid- (or latter) 40s thanks to finding online a misnomer ticket ($10 USD) that the household matriarch (mom/wife) received while cruisin' some campus (theymos' school or her and/or t's place of employment).
Based on everything I've read about Thermos, I'm led to understand he's in his 20's.

Don't really have anything against the guy, other than him being complicit in fraud and being a massive hypocrite, but... *shrugs* Don't really care how old he is, where he lives, etc etc... It was more of a "Oh ?! So you are OK with Josh Zerlan doxxing me, but fuck me for posting yours, right ?!" sorta thing.

He runs this place after all. Not going to harangue the guy. The point has been made numerous times.

vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
I had only seen topic that supposedly included information about theymos being removed.

I served a 45 day ban for posting Theymos' dox located on the blockchain. AMA.

I didn't know that was you. Unless theymos' dad has the same name as he, I may or may not possess proof that theymos is in his mid- (or latter) 40s thanks to finding online a misnomer ticket ($10 USD) that the household matriarch (mom/wife) received while cruisin' some campus (theymos' school or her and/or t's place of employment).
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10

There is something more recent that says they'll delete SSNs. I think it was with the Josh subpoena thread if anyone wants to dig that up.

Think you might be referring to this post:

For legal reasons, any sort of secret ID code/number that is used by the insecure legacy government/banking systems is banned from bitcointalk.org.

This includes, for example:
- US social security numbers
- Non-US government ID numbers that can cause security problems when released
- Credit card numbers

Exceptions might possibly be made if this info is absolutely essential to a scam investigation or it's very certain that you're posting secret ID codes that belong to you.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
I don't think you understand the difference between public "personal" information and private information.

You're right, I don't. Why don't you point out the rule specifying what info is prohibited?

"Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

Quote
Q: What about deleting DOXes?
A: Nope, we don't delete them


There is something more recent that says they'll delete SSNs. I think it was with the Josh subpoena thread if anyone wants to dig that up.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
I don't think you understand the difference between public "personal" information and private information.

You're right, I don't. Why don't you point out the rule specifying what info is prohibited?

"Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657

Quote
Q: What about deleting DOXes?
A: Nope, we don't delete them
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
I had only seen topic that supposedly included information about theymos being removed.
I served a 45 day ban for posting Theymos' dox located on the blockchain. AMA.
What were the contents of the dox, name, address, SSN etc?
Yep. All located on the blockchain.

EDIT: To be absolutely clear, I posted a link to a pastebin containing the dox. The pastebin link was located while perusing blockchain.info for one of Theymos' known Bitcoin addresses.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
I had only seen topic that supposedly included information about theymos being removed.

I served a 45 day ban for posting Theymos' dox located on the blockchain. AMA.

What were the contents of the dox, name, address, SSN etc?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
I had only seen topic that supposedly included information about theymos being removed.

I served a 45 day ban for posting Theymos' dox located on the blockchain. AMA.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Sad truth is that this forum has been completely irresponsible with handling 'private information'. It's a bit odd how Josh's info gets erased so quickly while Doxes of other members including more sensitive info than just that are out in the open. If mods have just started keeping an eye out for such things then I guess that it is a good thing but prior to that I had only seen topic that supposedly included information about theymos being removed.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
Joshua Zipkin's Social Security Number: moderator note: posting sensitive personal information is not allowed

Since when? This forum is full of sensitive personal information.

I don't think you understand the difference between public "personal" information and private information.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Joshua Zipkin's Social Security Number: moderator note: posting sensitive personal information is not allowed

Since when? This forum is full of sensitive personal information.

Yea didnt seem to be a problem when Joshua ZIpkin Doxxed me and the mods left my real name up. Was not until Josh removed it under threat of legal action that he removed it. Mods were nowhere to be found considering that the removal post was there. Either way tho, his SSN doesnt really matter.

 The only thing that matters is the money he stole from all of his clients and blatant fraud. Not to mention answering getting investigated for the hack. It is my opinion that he is the one who financed this. He certainly was involved in my opinion based on all his various statements. He has the means and most of all motive. Not to mention he has made death threats on people on here before, so why would a hacking attempt be any less of an issue for him?
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
Joshua Zipkin's Social Security Number: moderator note: posting sensitive personal information is not allowed

Since when? This forum is full of sensitive personal information.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Someone is wearing an eye patch, look at the post just above Roll Eyes
Only thing that's making me salty is the fact that you two haven't gotten a room yet, with the way you're carrying on here.

You two come off as a bitter married couple that likes to snipe at each other, then hate-fuck afterwards.

It's pathetic. Both of you.

/salt

Meh.

Guys a fraudster let the UK gov't sort em out.  All that matters really is this guy can't be trusted plenty of evidence for that now.

As for Zipkin anyone willing to throw out death threats is willing to pay for the forum to be taken down. Anyone think he isn't capable of hiring someone to do that is mistaken.

Pages:
Jump to: