The way the casino acted is so unprofessional as well, and it truly proves that your money was never safe in the first place. Such a casino may only honour a small withdrawal but could give excuses not to pay a sizable amount. Everyone wants to open a casino business, that's the problem.
[...]
Thank you for your understanding.
Joya Casino Representative
Any of you two --or better yet, both of you, as it's always nice to hear the whole story from both sides-- can you please tell us what transpires, preferably ELI5 mode, if it can't be in a good English? I am sorry, I am not trying to be condescending and insulting your English, but I really really don't understand what happens.
What is it with putting an x amount on deposit and put another amount [y] on wallet, and yet another amount being returned. Without these, I can't get a better understanding of what happens.
If anyone else understand what transpires, I will really appreciate if you would step in and explains to me.
Notwithstanding, despite his English, I believe he was trying to say that he has already satisfied the condition needed for the withdrawal, so I think that shouldn't take us backwards anymore, even as Joya.Casino did not disagree with that. Nevertheless, what Joya.Casino alleged is not uncommon in a dispute like this, and as usual, no evidence is provided in that regard to truly show that the guy was guilty. Anyone can say anything to cover up something, talk is cheap, it's evidence that proves a fact.
As it is now, I think the OP should post all the initial support responses to be sure whether or not they tally with the claims of Joya.Casino or their claims are mere afterthoughts. What do you think?