The more you lie about it in order to fool everyone, the more likely you are to drop a hint as to who is behind your account. I have a name in mind, but I'm not the type of DT that looks into account history anymore; I'm more concerned with those who break the rules.
Don't tell me that what you think of me will be associated with an rby, or naim account. This will be a new drama
However, you react a bit aggressively to every reply here, which otherwise reminds me of some earlier trolls here, and this all adds to the claim that you are still not a complete beginner on this forum. In addition to the history of your posts, it is obvious that in less than a month you have learned in detail some details of the forum, which many members have not for a much longer period.
Well, maybe I shouldn't be fighting a lord here. Very different from other explanations which say that all members are the same. That's a lie, there are other forces that don't want to be disturbed and don't want to be criticized.
Maybe I realized too late that everyone here should only be interested in bitcoins. They should not be interested in anything else, nor should they be interested in learning anything else
You should mind. Yes, this is obviously a "fake newbie," (as suchmoon would say,) but there's far more unfounded speculation in the feedback than just the obvious.
That neutral tag JollyGood left is a retaliatory feedback, and was only left there because the OP had the audacity to challenge JG during his most recent crusade against another user. That's why he felt the need to speculate about alleged alt-farming and other intentions. Does anyone believe that JG would have left that tag if the newbie had jumped on the Bash rby Bandwagon instead of challenge the effort?
When JG gets his panties in a twist he starts an advertising campaign, creating multiple threads, spamming his opinion in every thread touching on the subject of his vendetta, and trying to get as many people on his side as possible. Typical tactics for one who lacks confidence in his convictions. He's obviously abusing his position as DT and has been for years. He has no more business being on DT than Derek Chauvin has being a cop.
The trouble here is the OP fell right into his trap. By creating this thread he's done nothing but bring attention to JollyGood's latest subject of scorn (i.e. himself.) Now all those who have JG in their trust inclusions have to chime in on this thread, but all they have to say is "yup, that's a fake newbie," just to justify having JG included.
But it's also useless if indeed he is considered to have abused the power of DT but no one dares to fight him. Just like him who didn't dare to tag yahoo and nutildah, who in another thread admitted that he had been involved in buying and selling accounts. Jolly only dares to new members or people who have no influence. I also know Jolly has influence so even though she flags people on assumptions, no one dares to go against her.
In a theory it is also explained that someone who has power does not want his position and power to be sued, he will use all his power and position to keep his power and position safe.
Yes you are right, maybe jolly cheers because without him coming here already many support him. Yet I remains consistent that tagging someone solely on assumptions is a mistake, and tagging a series of judgments without providing preliminary evidence is also a mistake. Even though I don't care about the results of that judgments... because everything is just an assumption...
I didn't look into the reason why JollyGood thinks you might be an alt account because you have more knowledge of the forum than a newcomer would, but as to you question above: in general, newbies are clueless about what's happening on the forum, not necessarily about bitcoin. Unless you were a lurker prior to registering, why would you be familiar with anything related to the forum? And even then, you'd have to have been a lurker for a long time just to get a sense of bitcointalk's politics and history, and frankly I don't think many people lurk here and just read before they become members and start posting. That might have happened in the past (as with me in 2014-15) but it's become much rarer.
i didn't spy on forums before i signed up. But my mistake maybe I was interested in the board's reputation, forcing me to read too much about the rules of this forum. I didn't find the discussion interesting for another discussion. I'm familiar with bitcoin because I've played airdrop before being told about this forum. The discussions that I try to make also always fail, they are not interesting
So, last week you complained about someone calling you a kid (on a public discussion platform), now you're complaining about neutral feedback. What's next?
Do you mean I can't complain about the tags provided by DT? even though the tag is wrong? or is there really a rule that it is forbidden to complain to DT?
There is nothing wrong with somebody attempting to build a reputation for himself, but the question is why? I understand the op is attempting to suck his way into the DT system, but if I were him, I would focus on becoming a better member. I know the op was busted in his previous account, and he's doing the same thing now, drawing needless attention to himself. The more popular you are in this community, the more likely you are to get into trouble.
Op it's time to lock this thread; it's not helping....
yes, i didn't expect jolly to get so much support. Though I'm pretty sure that what he does isn't always right. And like in other threads, people are busy finding fault with me, accusing me of being alt, accusing me of breaking rules on other accounts, or maybe I'll be linked with rby or naim. But that's an assumption. But I know that no one can prove it, even so no one will be satisfied if they haven't found fault with me. But everyone here isn't looking for or judging jolly faults, isn't that discriminatory? or is there a statement that old members will always be right, and new members will always be wrong?
Yes.. since last night I thought about closing this thread. But if i close it does that mean i lost and jolly won?
Yes - I know that's fine, but I tend to expect it to be unhurried. The OP is different - his way has led several users to speculate about his account and motives and of course it's not going to help him.
I don't really want to speculate on that either - but I guess by now the OP has been on some DT distrust lists [~PytagoraZ] because of the way he responded to some advice.
Yes I know that what I do will make many people judge me. But no one thought that if that person had any faults then he wouldn't dare to open a thread here
