Topic: (JWL) JEWELS 🔷 HEROES LAUNCHED 🔷 1ST JWL USE CASE 🔷 TRADING ON BITTREX - page 134. (Read 212673 times)
August 22, 2016, 08:01:25 AM
Can we get an update to know how the other discussions are going for outside investments.
August 22, 2016, 07:39:14 AM
Can everyone stop quoting and interacting with the troll. Its making it hard for people to stay on track with the projects movements. And wasting my time while reading the thread looking to stay up-to-date.
Thank you.
Thank you.
August 22, 2016, 07:25:05 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
Even if it doesn't hit 200 BTC this is from OP message :
I have a minimum goal of 200 BTC ($120,000.00 USD). If at the end even after factoring in outside investments we have a budget less than $120,000 USD we will first seek to establish a new roadmap for development based on the available budget. Once we know this, we will then publish this information publicly and allow those who invested to vote weighted by their investment on whether we should proceed. If the majority votes "no" implying that they wish to be refunded then Jewels project will not proceed and we will begin the process of issuing a refund of all BTC. On the contrary, if the majority votes "yes" implying they wish to proceed despite the change in timeline which likely implies delayed schedules we will continue distribution and proceed with Jewels as intended.
So it means project might still continue, but progress will be much more slow of course.
But what are the options if it misses the target. I understand a new timeline but they still need funding. Where will they find it, is it possible that they can do another ico. Myabe that's what they should have done all along. Fooer 2 or 3 ico's over 2 or 3 months.
Servers and development of new content is going to be developed regardless of jewels ... Jewels will just be an in-game currency and a potential to be included in other online games when they develop casino games. Funding will just speed everything up.
But what other ways can they find funding if not with jewels? I really hop it makes it to the goal. Or very close then I can push it over.
August 22, 2016, 07:19:11 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
it wont even hit 50btc invested.. gaming is dead and gambling is dead, bitcointalk is dead, microsoft is dead, linux is dead, my first dog is dead, my sense of huomor is dead, hype is dead, ponzi gaming coins are dead, BITCOIN is dead, my account is dead, ponzi are ALIVE! invest in ponzi and forget the dead. you must live on and not live for dead.
Want to take a bet that it will hit 50+
? August 22, 2016, 07:08:15 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
Even if it doesn't hit 200 BTC this is from OP message :
I have a minimum goal of 200 BTC ($120,000.00 USD). If at the end even after factoring in outside investments we have a budget less than $120,000 USD we will first seek to establish a new roadmap for development based on the available budget. Once we know this, we will then publish this information publicly and allow those who invested to vote weighted by their investment on whether we should proceed. If the majority votes "no" implying that they wish to be refunded then Jewels project will not proceed and we will begin the process of issuing a refund of all BTC. On the contrary, if the majority votes "yes" implying they wish to proceed despite the change in timeline which likely implies delayed schedules we will continue distribution and proceed with Jewels as intended.
So it means project might still continue, but progress will be much more slow of course.
But what are the options if it misses the target. I understand a new timeline but they still need funding. Where will they find it, is it possible that they can do another ico. Myabe that's what they should have done all along. Fooer 2 or 3 ico's over 2 or 3 months.
Servers and development of new content is going to be developed regardless of jewels ... Jewels will just be an in-game currency and a potential to be included in other online games when they develop casino games. Funding will just speed everything up.
August 22, 2016, 07:00:57 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
Even if it doesn't hit 200 BTC this is from OP message :
I have a minimum goal of 200 BTC ($120,000.00 USD). If at the end even after factoring in outside investments we have a budget less than $120,000 USD we will first seek to establish a new roadmap for development based on the available budget. Once we know this, we will then publish this information publicly and allow those who invested to vote weighted by their investment on whether we should proceed. If the majority votes "no" implying that they wish to be refunded then Jewels project will not proceed and we will begin the process of issuing a refund of all BTC. On the contrary, if the majority votes "yes" implying they wish to proceed despite the change in timeline which likely implies delayed schedules we will continue distribution and proceed with Jewels as intended.
So it means project might still continue, but progress will be much more slow of course.
But what are the options if it misses the target. I understand a new timeline but they still need funding. Where will they find it, is it possible that they can do another ico. Myabe that's what they should have done all along. Fooer 2 or 3 ico's over 2 or 3 months.
August 22, 2016, 06:48:23 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal. 
Its ok. 31 Bitcoins invested so far with over a week left is an amazing start. Don't be fooled by the ico's that have "raised" 500-600-800" BTC in the first few days. 99% of those are scams and the BTC you see is belong to the devs. Id prefer to see this get funded slowly, over the full term. Seriously don't be falling for the ico scams left right and center and make sure when you pick whatever investment you want that you're 100% behind your investment, you've done the research and can sleep comfortable at night knowing your BTC are locked up in whichever ico you choose.
Most of them ICO suck anyway and I'm glad I never invested.
The thing that sucks the most is they raise btc from people and then with their massive own brought they dump it down to shake legit investors
That is disgusting, waves as an example of that.These small and legit ICO is where your investment will have the most chance, real world development behind it from the start, not just fairy tales of what the future holds.
LISK for instance raising thousands of btc has only just released a road map months and months after accepting peoples money.
Real world purpose ICO is where investments should be heading in 2016, not promises of the world lol
Its funny that when there is a good project, with good and working bussiness plan, less people are interested in them. I wonder why
I think it might have something to do with the smoke and mirror projects that promise the world have a lot of btc gained through previous sales. With that they cause hype and people fall for it everytime.
Most of the time the price then crashes so they can get everyones cheap coins before the real pump. So many of the ones that risked it and invested in the sale never actually get out in profit.
A project like this, will have no hype and no hundreds of btc faked. It will all be real but the small starting marketcap will give potential for it to return a very good return when the crowd enter the game.
I would find it hard to believe people in crypto don't want a walk around casino, poker, roulette, blackjack all provably fair. A working game with thousands of players and a crypto as the in-game currency. Luckily I found this early and am involved before the market cap blows the roof off.
I see. Thanks. This coin may have a good chance to be well known among laymen gamer. Laymen in term of crypto. If Jewels team manage to introduce JWL as a gaming crypto and make them self as laymen friendly, it will eventualy get mass adoption.
Hope the team will also manage to get external financial support too. As what they said, this ICO is not the only source of finance for this project. They are trying to get external fund to complete the 120k USD too.
August 22, 2016, 06:44:59 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
Even if it doesn't hit 200 BTC this is from OP message :
I have a minimum goal of 200 BTC ($120,000.00 USD). If at the end even after factoring in outside investments we have a budget less than $120,000 USD we will first seek to establish a new roadmap for development based on the available budget. Once we know this, we will then publish this information publicly and allow those who invested to vote weighted by their investment on whether we should proceed. If the majority votes "no" implying that they wish to be refunded then Jewels project will not proceed and we will begin the process of issuing a refund of all BTC. On the contrary, if the majority votes "yes" implying they wish to proceed despite the change in timeline which likely implies delayed schedules we will continue distribution and proceed with Jewels as intended.
So it means project might still continue, but progress will be much more slow of course.
August 22, 2016, 06:39:10 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
Its ok. 31 Bitcoins invested so far with over a week left is an amazing start. Don't be fooled by the ico's that have "raised" 500-600-800" BTC in the first few days. 99% of those are scams and the BTC you see is belong to the devs. Id prefer to see this get funded slowly, over the full term. Seriously don't be falling for the ico scams left right and center and make sure when you pick whatever investment you want that you're 100% behind your investment, you've done the research and can sleep comfortable at night knowing your BTC are locked up in whichever ico you choose.
Most of them ICO suck anyway and I'm glad I never invested.
The thing that sucks the most is they raise btc from people and then with their massive own brought they dump it down to shake legit investors
That is disgusting, waves as an example of that.These small and legit ICO is where your investment will have the most chance, real world development behind it from the start, not just fairy tales of what the future holds.
LISK for instance raising thousands of btc has only just released a road map months and months after accepting peoples money.
Real world purpose ICO is where investments should be heading in 2016, not promises of the world lol
Its funny that when there is a good project, with good and working bussiness plan, less people are interested in them. I wonder why
I think it might have something to do with the smoke and mirror projects that promise the world have a lot of btc gained through previous sales. With that they cause hype and people fall for it everytime.
Most of the time the price then crashes so they can get everyones cheap coins before the real pump. So many of the ones that risked it and invested in the sale never actually get out in profit.
A project like this, will have no hype and no hundreds of btc faked. It will all be real but the small starting marketcap will give potential for it to return a very good return when the crowd enter the game.
I would find it hard to believe people in crypto don't want a walk around casino, poker, roulette, blackjack all provably fair. A working game with thousands of players and a crypto as the in-game currency. Luckily I found this early and am involved before the market cap blows the roof off.
This project will have hype, Rome wasn't built in a day.
Like you explained it won't be from the start because of devs filling the wallet with thousands of BTC though.
It will be because of the legitimacy of the team and the community that is built around that.
Jewels will pick up mega traction but it will be real and not because of fake BTC.
August 22, 2016, 06:36:47 AM
I still dont think it can hit the goal with only 31 btc invested. it needs to have 170 btc invested by now for a sellout to even be possible but obviously this is just my amateur investor opinion.
August 22, 2016, 06:07:22 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
Its ok. 31 Bitcoins invested so far with over a week left is an amazing start. Don't be fooled by the ico's that have "raised" 500-600-800" BTC in the first few days. 99% of those are scams and the BTC you see is belong to the devs. Id prefer to see this get funded slowly, over the full term. Seriously don't be falling for the ico scams left right and center and make sure when you pick whatever investment you want that you're 100% behind your investment, you've done the research and can sleep comfortable at night knowing your BTC are locked up in whichever ico you choose.
Most of them ICO suck anyway and I'm glad I never invested.
The thing that sucks the most is they raise btc from people and then with their massive own brought they dump it down to shake legit investors
That is disgusting, waves as an example of that.These small and legit ICO is where your investment will have the most chance, real world development behind it from the start, not just fairy tales of what the future holds.
LISK for instance raising thousands of btc has only just released a road map months and months after accepting peoples money.
Real world purpose ICO is where investments should be heading in 2016, not promises of the world lol
Its funny that when there is a good project, with good and working bussiness plan, less people are interested in them. I wonder why
August 22, 2016, 05:56:01 AM
If you believe it's a good investment, people dumping should be a GOOD thing -- it means you get more coins for even less than before.
Hopefully everything goes good but I will def be there watching for those panic sells :p
As will I. There haven't been any official announcements for an exchange yes has there? I hope we can get on Bittrex pretty quickly, I think it will definitely help draw attention to this coin.
yeah, i hate ccex..... let's hope for bittrex and dream with poloniex
Poloniex is just hopeful at this point but I think Bittrex is a definite possibility if enough people contact them. They have a slack so we should be messaging them there.
It could be an idea to start a slack for Jewels and build up a base of operations so to speak. In the end it will be good to group up and hit the bittrex twitter or just get a guild going. Dev team, you start and official or a member of the community?
August 22, 2016, 05:10:33 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
Its ok. 31 Bitcoins invested so far with over a week left is an amazing start. Don't be fooled by the ico's that have "raised" 500-600-800" BTC in the first few days. 99% of those are scams and the BTC you see is belong to the devs. Id prefer to see this get funded slowly, over the full term. Seriously don't be falling for the ico scams left right and center and make sure when you pick whatever investment you want that you're 100% behind your investment, you've done the research and can sleep comfortable at night knowing your BTC are locked up in whichever ico you choose.
I have not seen any fake ico's yet maybe its because im new here. Can you point some of them out so I can go see them.
August 22, 2016, 04:58:22 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
Its ok. 31 Bitcoins invested so far with over a week left is an amazing start. Don't be fooled by the ico's that have "raised" 500-600-800" BTC in the first few days. 99% of those are scams and the BTC you see is belong to the devs. Id prefer to see this get funded slowly, over the full term. Seriously don't be falling for the ico scams left right and center and make sure when you pick whatever investment you want that you're 100% behind your investment, you've done the research and can sleep comfortable at night knowing your BTC are locked up in whichever ico you choose.
August 22, 2016, 04:37:30 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
Many projects won't raise much until the last days, that is when the fomo usually starts.
On average the few projects I've invested in recently have raise over 50% in the last few days.
Stratis as the most recent example.
Think positive
August 22, 2016, 04:27:01 AM
I see only 31 btc invested. I dont think it will hit the goal.
August 22, 2016, 04:16:41 AM
If you believe it's a good investment, people dumping should be a GOOD thing -- it means you get more coins for even less than before.
Hopefully everything goes good but I will def be there watching for those panic sells :p
As will I. There haven't been any official announcements for an exchange yes has there? I hope we can get on Bittrex pretty quickly, I think it will definitely help draw attention to this coin.
Surprised that this actually doesn't have that much attention. Of course its not being driven down peoples throats either. Sign of a non pnd coin
lol. now days real project seem to have the least amount of pages in there threadsThis thread has 36 pages. I'd say its got a lot of attention.
August 22, 2016, 04:15:12 AM
ruzka why no sell pressure for Jewels?
Maybe 'no sell pressure' was exaggerated
what i meant was, not much sell pressure because there is no free coins given to everyone to dump on real investors. This is the first real ico sale that has not shit on investors by giving away so many free coin. I hold high hopes for Jewels and its team. Yeah I agree, no bonuses, no free coins to be dumped, zero "can I do this translation" posts. Its all for the better.
Yeah I think this is first of it's kind ICO - no bounties, no free coins, no extreme bonuses and I think that's the way to go with it! No one will sell under ICO price that's for sure and I quite like that.
I dont think its the first but its definitely doing things different from the rest, but its no wonder. Tis is a real project and all the rest are just jokes and scams to take your money.
AFAIK there is no gaming coin other than JWL that will immediately use the coin for immediate adoption in long established game. Mostly will develop and try to negotiate deal with game developer to consider using their coin. Some offer the coin as winning price with the hope that people will try their best to win more of their coin. The flaw with this strategy is: there is too many uncertainties and fewer motivation for real adoption.
JWL will be used by the developer of the games itself. The coin developers are also the adopter of their own system. And the game has been gathering user base for 1-2 years now. Looks at their numbers:
The Numbers
Here are some bullet point metrics about the current game and servers which may give you a grasp on how things are at the financial level
- The average user is on 1-3 accounts at the same time (doing various tasks)
- On average 1 in 20 accounts will spend atleast $4.00 (est. 1 in 6 players).
- Those who’ve paid for things, average out to $80.00 an account (over a year and a half)
- The most common amount a user will spend is about $25.00 at once
- At peak revenue, the gross was 8,000.00 - 12,000.00 USD/mo.
- 250 - 600 players on at any given time
- Around 2000 unique accounts accessed via logging in each day
- The new server “Heroes” is expected to increase player count due to its appeal with new content and can therefore be better monetized via Jewels
Great post. I feel like it should be bumped on every page.
August 22, 2016, 01:06:29 AM
If you believe it's a good investment, people dumping should be a GOOD thing -- it means you get more coins for even less than before.
Hopefully everything goes good but I will def be there watching for those panic sells :p
As will I. There haven't been any official announcements for an exchange yes has there? I hope we can get on Bittrex pretty quickly, I think it will definitely help draw attention to this coin.
yeah, i hate ccex..... let's hope for bittrex and dream with poloniex
Poloniex is just hopeful at this point but I think Bittrex is a definite possibility if enough people contact them. They have a slack so we should be messaging them there.
If dev stays true to his word and Rebirth happens then Poloniex is not hopeful but inevitable!
August 21, 2016, 10:17:10 PM
If you believe it's a good investment, people dumping should be a GOOD thing -- it means you get more coins for even less than before.
Hopefully everything goes good but I will def be there watching for those panic sells :p
As will I. There haven't been any official announcements for an exchange yes has there? I hope we can get on Bittrex pretty quickly, I think it will definitely help draw attention to this coin.
yeah, i hate ccex..... let's hope for bittrex and dream with poloniex
Poloniex is just hopeful at this point but I think Bittrex is a definite possibility if enough people contact them. They have a slack so we should be messaging them there.
Jump to: