Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 732. (Read 5352367 times)

jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 3
I started mining 3 weeks ago as a hands-on experiment to better understand crypto-currency.  I use Kano as my pool and have been having fun and it has been going well.

But.....

I just went to spend my first bit coins and I was hit with a $40+ miner fee on a $50 purchase!

After research and reading I learned that is because of the nature of the inputs to my wallets.   Lots of little bitty mining rewards were used to create my one large $50 transaction.

So - is there any way to set how often you get paid by the pool?   I'd rather let Kano hold the coins for two weeks at a time because right now my miner fees FAR exceeds the capital gains I've experienced in the last two weeks by bitcoin rise in value.  Receiving the coins every two weeks would half the number of inputs to my wallet and half my fees.

Also - I need advice.   I'm stuck   I can't spend my coins without SERIOUS miner fees.   What should I do?

You can send them with a virtually zero transaction fee to another address you own.  However it could take a very very long time for the transaction to be confirmed.  Or it could be confirmed right away.  (More than likely the former.)

You may also be able to find an online wallet that can receive the transactions that won't charge you huge network fees when you withdraw.  I did that accidentally with a NiceHash wallet, and they didn't complain about it.  

Of course you then have the online wallet withdrawal fee, and your coins aren't in your control.

Maybe now that the fork is nixed, Kano can work on the "only send payments when accumulated over X amount" code? Smiley  

M

Thanks - I'll try the wallet to wallet thing.   Thats actually a cool idea.

By the way - in response to the "accumulate more coin" post above:  I thought of that, but I think in this particular case that won't help.   The fee is based on the size of the inputs, which is basically constant as I mine(everyone of my payments is roughly the same).  So in my circumstance a $500USD transaction will require 10 times the input as a $50USD transaction, and therefore have the same relative fee (ie $400USD) fee.

Or am I wrong about this?   Like I said, i am doing this to learn and I am a newbie so maybe I'm wrong???

Thanks again!

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
I started mining 3 weeks ago as a hands-on experiment to better understand crypto-currency.  I use Kano as my pool and have been having fun and it has been going well.

But.....

I just went to spend my first bit coins and I was hit with a $40+ miner fee on a $50 purchase!

After research and reading I learned that is because of the nature of the inputs to my wallets.   Lots of little bitty mining rewards were used to create my one large $50 transaction.

So - is there any way to set how often you get paid by the pool?   I'd rather let Kano hold the coins for two weeks at a time because right now my miner fees FAR exceeds the capital gains I've experienced in the last two weeks by bitcoin rise in value.  Receiving the coins every two weeks would half the number of inputs to my wallet and half my fees.

Also - I need advice.   I'm stuck   I can't spend my coins without SERIOUS miner fees.   What should I do?

You can send them with a virtually zero transaction fee to another address you own.  However it could take a very very long time for the transaction to be confirmed.  Or it could be confirmed right away.  (More than likely the former.)

You may also be able to find an online wallet that can receive the transactions that won't charge you huge network fees when you withdraw.  I did that accidentally with a NiceHash wallet, and they didn't complain about it.  

Of course you then have the online wallet withdrawal fee, and your coins aren't in your control.

Maybe now that the fork is nixed, Kano can work on the "only send payments when accumulated over X amount" code? Smiley  

M
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
I started mining 3 weeks ago as a hands-on experiment to better understand crypto-currency.  I use Kano as my pool and have been having fun and it has been going well.

But.....

I just went to spend my first bit coins and I was hit with a $40+ miner fee on a $50 purchase!

After research and reading I learned that is because of the nature of the inputs to my wallets.   Lots of little bitty mining rewards were used to create my one large $50 transaction.

So - is there any way to set how often you get paid by the pool?   I'd rather let Kano hold the coins for two weeks at a time because right now my miner fees FAR exceeds the capital gains I've experienced in the last two weeks by bitcoin rise in value.  Receiving the coins every two weeks would half the number of inputs to my wallet and half my fees.

Also - I need advice.   I'm stuck   I can't spend my coins without SERIOUS miner fees.   What should I do?
You need to consolidate your transactions. This is best done during a time when the network is not busy. Right now the network is clogged with transactions, so fees to transfer are very high. You can send them with a lower satoshi/byte ratio, but you will wait  for while to have your transaction confirmed. You can use a transaction accelerator like this one https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ and they would include it in the next block they mine.
member
Activity: 658
Merit: 21
4 s9's 2 821's
I started mining 3 weeks ago as a hands-on experiment to better understand crypto-currency.  I use Kano as my pool and have been having fun and it has been going well.

But.....

I just went to spend my first bit coins and I was hit with a $40+ miner fee on a $50 purchase!

After research and reading I learned that is because of the nature of the inputs to my wallets.   Lots of little bitty mining rewards were used to create my one large $50 transaction.

So - is there any way to set how often you get paid by the pool?   I'd rather let Kano hold the coins for two weeks at a time because right now my miner fees FAR exceeds the capital gains I've experienced in the last two weeks by bitcoin rise in value.  Receiving the coins every two weeks would half the number of inputs to my wallet and half my fees.

Also - I need advice.   I'm stuck   I can't spend my coins without SERIOUS miner fees.   What should I do?

Hold onto your bitcoins until you have more of them.
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
What I was asking is with current hash rate and diff, the expected blocks should be less than 1 block per day.
But the stat shows almost one block per day.
Most likely it is that the first block found to start this month block originally started being worked on 10/28. So you would need to add those days in as well.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
What I was asking is with current hash rate and diff, the expected blocks should be less than 1 block per day.
But the stat shows almost one block per day.

Expected == what you get on average
Actual == will vary.  over a long enough period of time, it will become "expected"

Right now the pool is doing better than average.

M
xuy
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
What I was asking is with current hash rate and diff, the expected blocks should be less than 1 block per day.
But the stat shows almost one block per day.

Can someone explain to me why the number of expected blocks does not match the hash rate? Currently with 45PHs, we expect less than one block a day but Kano's stat shows almost one block per day in November.
So with diff 100%, the luck is also 100%? If the diff is 200%, the luck then is 50%? Is it right?

Luck, over time, is always 100%, assuming everything else is working properly.

That means some times luck will be good, and sometimes it will be bad.

Right now, so far this month, it's been good.  Better than average.

The last few months have been bad.  Below average.

M
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Can someone explain to me why the number of expected blocks does not match the hash rate? Currently with 45PHs, we expect less than one block a day but Kano's stat shows almost one block per day in November.
So with diff 100%, the luck is also 100%? If the diff is 200%, the luck then is 50%? Is it right?

Luck, over time, is always 100%, assuming everything else is working properly.

That means some times luck will be good, and sometimes it will be bad.

Right now, so far this month, it's been good.  Better than average.

The last few months have been bad.  Below average.

M
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0

Try:

stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333

M

It Doesn't work yet.

Sad


You need the stratum+tcp:// part if you don't have it.

Yes of course but it doesn't work, at the moment i'm linked and working with slushpool
Sorry if this is a dumb question but do you have your worker field and password field filled out correctly?
xuy
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
Can someone explain to me why the number of expected blocks does not match the hash rate? Currently with 45PHs, we expect less than one block a day but Kano's stat shows almost one block per day in November.
So with diff 100%, the luck is also 100%? If the diff is 200%, the luck then is 50%? Is it right?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Heads up!  Watch your PM's!  Someone just tried to phish me.  If he did it to me, he probably did it to others!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24247003

M
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
If you haven't heard... Segwit2X cancelled!

BTC 10K ?

LIVE now : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DURIPYlsx5s

Eric Voorhees confirming that #Segwit2x has been called off: https://twitter.com/ErikVoorhees/status/928316364585963520  They did the right thing!  A serious price spike is underway.  And, we were nearing record short levels and all those clowns have to cover.  love it!

Wowsers!!  And I here I thought people may be buying up because of the split, to get their "free money".

That explains why the price is climbing again.

These are very good times to be a miner! Smiley

M
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
If you haven't heard... Segwit2X cancelled!

BTC 10K ?

LIVE now : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DURIPYlsx5s

Eric Voorhees confirming that #Segwit2x has been called off: https://twitter.com/ErikVoorhees/status/928316364585963520  They did the right thing!  A serious price spike is underway.  And, we were nearing record short levels and all those clowns have to cover.  love it!
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
S9s are available.

Your heads up allowed me to snag a few. As noted in an earlier post I was in the market for some. So thanks for the heads up. Again great to be part of a good community.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0

Try:

stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333

M

It Doesn't work yet.

Sad


You need the stratum+tcp:// part if you don't have it.

Yes of course but it doesn't work, at the moment i'm linked and working with slushpool
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Hi,
at the moment i have
stratum.kano.is:80
and
stratum.kano.space:443

DEAD on my Antminer S9

is it normal ?

I use as dns 8.8.8.8

Try:

stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333

M

You need the stratum+tcp:// part if you don't have it.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Hi,
at the moment i have
stratum.kano.is:80
and
stratum.kano.space:443

DEAD on my Antminer S9

is it normal ?

I use as dns 8.8.8.8

Try:

stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333

M
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
Hi,
at the moment i have
stratum.kano.is:80
and
stratum.kano.space:443

DEAD on my Antminer S9

is it normal ?

I use as dns 8.8.8.8
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
S9s are available.

Pay with bcc/bch only

That sucks, man they are a manipulative company. Stocking their coffers with an alt currency in hopes it will rise like BTC.

Apparently it's not well known that they are the main reason BCH exists.  That's why they are backing it, it's their doing that it exists!

M

EDIT: I thought that's what I'd read at least, however I'm having a hard time finding documentation backing that.  Therefore I may be mistaken.

Jihan Wu and Roger Ver are the reason BCash exists.  It was their attempt to wrest codebase control away from Bitcoin Core, who in my opinion, has been doing a good job keeping Bitcoin safe since 2009.  Yes, Core needs to work a little faster to find better scaling solutions.  But, they follow a strict software development methodology and they work hard to get consensus from users and miners before making a major change.  I think these hard forks suck, and they take credibility away from Bitcoin.  This latest fork, Segwit2x, is Barry Silbert and Jeff Garzik's half baked attempt at a scaling solution.  It hasn't been through the rigorous testing process which Core uses.  Also, ironically, Jeff G just declared he is launching a competing coin (an ICO).  That is laughable.  Right when he should have been completely dedicated to Segwit2x, he announces a competing coin.  I hope this pool sticks with Bitcoin Core support as much as possible.  Also, run a Bitcoin Core node if you can in order to support the network.  This is a great tutorial if you are interested: https://99bitcoins.com/step-by-step-guide-firing-up-bitcoin-node/  Or, you can Google "Bitseed" and buy one of their dedicated nodes which you just plug into your router.
Jump to: