Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 890. (Read 5352420 times)

member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
I for one predict  12 more. Grin

Don't go jinx'n it now with your predictions.. Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
Block! by mikese Smiley

That gets us to 54 for the month  52.21  is 100% luck.

So 63 blocks for the month  will do the trick.

That means only 9 more needed.

I for one predict  12 more. Grin

or 66 for July
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Thanks again Kano-san!
Probably more detail than you want to know but ... Smiley

Web<->CKDB is handled via 2 socat connections through a secure tunnel.
The tunnel avoids constant logging in to the main server for every request, the socat's make a new connection for each message, through the tunnel and at the CKDB end translate the socket into a linux socket as per what CKDB wants.

When the tunnel closes (once in a blue moon) the replies to all the web messages that CKDB is processing, will not be wanted, since the web server will have given up on them and replied with the red "Database is reloading, mining is all OK" message.
This leads to a (possibly large) number of unwanted messages queued in CKDB and trying to be sent back to the web server.

I'll need to get CKDB to not report every one of them, but rather a summary a minute later, since it's OK that they fail, since they are no longer wanted.
However, on the console it looks like CKDB has gone into network cardiac arrest due to so many messages not replied, and I restarted it to clear it Smiley

As I mentioned, it's on the TODO list, but since it's ever so rare (happened probably only twice before) it's not urgent.

That's exactly the kinda stuff I like to hear about! While I'm not familiar with Socat, it sounds like CKDB just got into a strange state due to not being able to get replies from the web server, and couldn't recover.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Thanks again Kano-san!
Probably more detail than you want to know but ... Smiley

Web<->CKDB is handled via 2 socat connections through a secure tunnel.
The tunnel avoids constant logging in to the main server for every request, the socat's make a new connection for each message, through the tunnel and at the CKDB end translate the socket into a linux socket as per what CKDB wants.

When the tunnel closes (once in a blue moon) the replies to all the web messages that CKDB is processing, will not be wanted, since the web server will have given up on them and replied with the red "Database is reloading, mining is all OK" message.
This leads to a (possibly large) number of unwanted messages queued in CKDB and trying to be sent back to the web server.

I'll need to get CKDB to not report every one of them, but rather a summary a minute later, since it's OK that they fail, since they are no longer wanted.
However, on the console it looks like CKDB has gone into network cardiac arrest due to so many messages not replied, and I restarted it to clear it Smiley

As I mentioned, it's on the TODO list, but since it's ever so rare (happened probably only twice before) it's not urgent.
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 101
Nice green color! I like it, keep them coming guys!

Mine on
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Had a network glitch in CKDB - so I had to restart it.

Mining is completely unaffected.

Yet again, nothing to do with the recent changes - added to the TODO list to sort out why it happened and fix it Smiley
Restart almost complete.
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 9201
'The right to privacy matters'
Block! by bobsyouruncle Smiley
... and 3 payouts (including the missing one)


sorry  but  bob- is- my- cousin  not my uncle Grin
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Block! by bobsyouruncle Smiley
... and 3 payouts (including the missing one)
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
looks like the payout from 477443 was sent in that block, but not the one from 477428. or did i miss something?

Same question - did I/we miss/skip the payment for block 447428??
Yep it fell out overnight. There was a problem with one of my multitude of bitcoind at home, and when I fixed it, it would seem I missed pushing that txn to the pool.
I've put it back in just now and it will be in the next block.

Well ... always fun to note that any change in the work we mine of course (completely randomly) affects the blocks we find.
Could have found more, or less or the same, but at least in this case we found the next block faster than expected Smiley

Thanks for staying on top of this and keeping us in the loop, as always!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
looks like the payout from 477443 was sent in that block, but not the one from 477428. or did i miss something?

Same question - did I/we miss/skip the payment for block 447428??
Yep it fell out overnight. There was a problem with one of my multitude of bitcoind at home, and when I fixed it, it would seem I missed pushing that txn to the pool.
I've put it back in just now and it will be in the next block.

Well ... always fun to note that any change in the work we mine of course (completely randomly) affects the blocks we find.
Could have found more, or less or the same, but at least in this case we found the next block faster than expected Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
It shows on BTC.com as unknown:

477,563   unknown   1,948   988,095   0.00062121   12.5 + 0.61381006 BTC   2017-07-25 14:58:22   

Don't know what that means
...
I submitted a pull request to them to fix the "unknown" a few days ago ... after being told by Sarah at Bitmain that I had to do that ... though they ignored my request to fix the icon also ... since it should be '🐈'
https://github.com/btccom/Blockchain-Known-Pools/pull/10
Might be days, weeks or months until they bother Tongue
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
I currently only have 2 R4's for 17.2 TH. I will be adding my 1st S9 later today (on IPS truck for delivery) to increase my TH to 30.7.

Then in a few more weeks, I will be adding another S9 for a total of around 44.2 TH.

Love this pool !

Mine on!!



Its a big day for blocks... and adding more pool power!  Just fired up my first S9 as well tonight.  woot!

Welcome to the pool MAERK!
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
I currently only have 2 R4's for 17.2 TH. I will be adding my 1st S9 later today (on IPS truck for delivery) to increase my TH to 30.7.

Then in a few more weeks, I will be adding another S9 for a total of around 44.2 TH.

Love this pool !

Mine on!!



Its a big day for blocks... and adding more pool power!  Just fired up my first S9 as well tonight.  woot!
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 10
looks like the payout from 477443 was sent in that block, but not the one from 477428. or did i miss something?

Same question - did I/we miss/skip the payment for block 447428??
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Appreciate the status update Kano! You're a big reason why I love mining here.
Jump to: