Pages:
Author

Topic: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose (Read 1101 times)

copper member
Activity: 406
Merit: 59
XFX RX480 8GB stock bios
Core Freq running at 936
Voltage 1150
Clock VRAM Speed 1800
Power limit -18%
Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057


7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c

If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts

Use another miner, normal hashrate for RX470 - RX 580 are around 12,5 to 14mh with teamredminer. I don´t know why you have so low hashrates.
Yes team red miner + hiveos will get you that result no problem.
I have heard a lot that guys on windows get 7mh.s, most likely related to drivers i guess.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
XFX RX480 8GB stock bios
Core Freq running at 936
Voltage 1150
Clock VRAM Speed 1800
Power limit -18%
Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057


7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c

If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts

Use another miner, normal hashrate for RX470 - RX 580 are around 12,5 to 14mh with teamredminer. I don´t know why you have so low hashrates.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
XFX RX480 8GB stock bios
Core Freq running at 936
Voltage 1150
Clock VRAM Speed 1800
Power limit -18%
Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057


7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c

If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts
member
Activity: 242
Merit: 11
Just thought id toss in the hash rate of 2 cards that are not very popular (for mining at least).

GTX 1650 Super - 12.45 MH/s ( +150 core / + 1500 memory) @ 100 watts power consumption (VBIOS limit).

GTX 1650 Ti (laptop) - 9.4 MH/s (+ 200 core / +225 memory) @ 50 watts power consumption (VBIOS limit).

1650 Ti laptop is extremely efficient.
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
Hi all
RTX2060 GPU-1550, MEM 7700, PL-78%, 15,5Mhash/125Wat.
GTX1660Ti GPU-1340, MEM-6680, PL-58% , 10,5Mhash/70Wat
P106 GPU- 1290, MEM-4551 , PL-73% , 9,5Mhash/85W

I`m using Nicehash and mostly i`m mining daggerhasimoto on it. Few days ago, after Vosk`s YT i`ve spend night to settle kawpow on my rig (2060, 4x1660ti, 2xp106). Settings are ready for moning both with no change in OC needed.
copper member
Activity: 406
Merit: 59
i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video

not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol
lol that vosk dude is the worst man!

Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? Huh
GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm by Drew Vosk, on Flickr

I never knew your name was Drew.  Learned something new today  Grin
haha yeah man Cheesy -- what's your name :O
At this point it needs to be changed in passport to Vosk Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 487
YouTube.com/VoskCoin
i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video

not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol
lol that vosk dude is the worst man!

Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? Huh
GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm by Drew Vosk, on Flickr

I never knew your name was Drew.  Learned something new today  Grin
haha yeah man Cheesy -- what's your name :O
jr. member
Activity: 195
Merit: 4
Anyone seeing any numbers on the 5600 / 5600 xt?
full member
Activity: 1179
Merit: 131
i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video

not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol
lol that vosk dude is the worst man!

Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? Huh
GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm by Drew Vosk, on Flickr

I never knew your name was Drew.  Learned something new today  Grin
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Hi, I've tested my three AMD R9 390 with the nanominer 1.9.2, the hashrate is between 12.5 - 13.5 MH/s

https://imgur.com/a/EVoZ5iT
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 5
EVGA RTX 2070 BLACK OC'd through PrecisionX1 Core Clock +200 Memory Clock +1000 Power 114% 195W  ~23.1 MH/s GMiner 2.0.4
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 6GB GDDR6 OC'd through PrecisionX1 Core Clock +50 Memory Clock +310 Power 95%  118W ~14.8 MH/s GMiner 2.0.4
My NVidia cards both got about 1MH/s more with GMiner than with TRex 0.15.3

XFX RX 580 8GB No OC ~9-10MH/s 121W NBMine
jr. member
Activity: 156
Merit: 1
Hi all, FYI info:
GTX 1080 TI @+100 core +450 mem and 80%power load: 24MH/s on TTminer (206 W)
GTX 1070 @+170 core +550 mem and 80%power load: 14MH/s on TTminer (120 W)
and very similar with zenemy


sr. member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 487
YouTube.com/VoskCoin
i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video

not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol
lol that vosk dude is the worst man!

Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? Huh
GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm by Drew Vosk, on Flickr
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1408
I'm mining RVN with 2 cards:

RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall
Bios mod - memory  @1950 - Core Clock @1100

GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall
Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory

It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption


I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas?

RX 570 4GB 9.5 - 9.7 @ 110w
GTX 1060 3GB 9.5 - 10 @ 90w
GTX 1060 6GB 10 - 10.5 @ 90w

Your RX 570 do 1mhs more and consumes 10w less than mine
Can you share your parameters to achieve this hashrate?

I only hit 9.5 with more than 140w
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
I'm mining RVN with 2 cards:

RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall
Bios mod - memory  @1950 - Core Clock @1100

GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall
Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory

It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption


I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas?

RX 570 4GB 9.5 - 9.7 @ 110w
GTX 1060 3GB 9.5 - 10 @ 90w
GTX 1060 6GB 10 - 10.5 @ 90w
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1408
I'm mining RVN with 2 cards:

RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall
Bios mod - memory  @1950 - Core Clock @1100

GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall
Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory

It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption


I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas?
copper member
Activity: 406
Merit: 59
Great data, very helpful thanks,

are there also any values included for 1080 TI ? It would be interesting to see if it has a significant advantage over 1080, which is way too expensive / hashrate...

For previous RVN algorithms, 1080 TI was the boss in terms of efficiency.

edit: on the 2nd spreadsheet I'm glad to see 1080 TI's are performing very robustly for this algo with minor modifications.

Seen Red Panda mining was running these at 24-25mh/s
Profit has been great first few hours of mining with 7x1080 mined so far in first 15hours just over 530 RVN http://prntscr.com/scgnnz
But the mining has slowed down as many miners seen opportunity. With the same mining rig mined 300 RVN in first 30minutes.

But its good to see that AMD also performing so good on this mining algorithm.
copper member
Activity: 406
Merit: 59
The numbers for RX series look a little odd to me, basically they are

RX 480 8GB   9.2mh  99 watt
RX 570 4GB  10.5mh 133 watt
RX 580 8GB   12mh 133 watt

The RX 480 and RX 580 8GB is pretty much the exact same GPU. Why is the RX580 almost 30% faster and using 33% more power. Also how can the RX 570 4GB be faster than the RX 480GB?

The power wattage also is a bit off. The 480/580 8GB are identical cards but the wattage is different, I guess because the 580 8GB hashes more however if thats the case why does ther RX 570 4GB which is slower also use the same wattage?

Maybe run these benchmarks and tests again.

Different brand has different stock clocks also different memories, as these tests where done on stock settings. Also mining software can affect certain series of graphic cards performance.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1656
Great data, very helpful thanks,

are there also any values included for 1080 TI ? It would be interesting to see if it has a significant advantage over 1080, which is way too expensive / hashrate...

For previous RVN algorithms, 1080 TI was the boss in terms of efficiency.

edit: on the 2nd spreadsheet I'm glad to see 1080 TI's are performing very robustly for this algo with minor modifications.
Pages:
Jump to: