Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key.
[/quote]
Hi, I'm new to this research. I know it's practically impossible to look up all the private keys.
But with the public key is it possible? How much time?
i have been playing with bsgs but to no avail
single address
./keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/1to32.eth -b 120 -k 640 -t 3 -q -S -B dance
Topic: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports - page 24. (Read 15202 times)
Hi, is it possible for you to consider making a video, or even a step-by-step note on how to test find ethereum's private key, using a known public key.
I couldn't find a step by step about it and I couldn't do it.
I couldn't find a step by step about it and I couldn't do it.
By the way guys i just add support for
- Ethereum
- Minikeys
- Ethereum
- Minikeys
By the way guys i just add support for
- Ethereum
- Minikeys
Also i double the speed for rmd160 and add stride option for xpoint, rmd160, address, and ethereum.
I need to make changes in the code to work with those new modes.
That depend if you enable the flag -R, with that it is random. without it is sequential.
Best regards!
- Ethereum
- Minikeys
Also i double the speed for rmd160 and add stride option for xpoint, rmd160, address, and ethereum.
is it possible to add a mode -B dance to xpoint mode?
I need to make changes in the code to work with those new modes.
Is xpoint mode sequential or random when searching for keys?
That depend if you enable the flag -R, with that it is random. without it is sequential.
Best regards!
Is xpoint mode sequential or random when searching for keys?
is it possible to add a mode -B dance to xpoint mode?
Albert, I think your videos will help people understand, especially the "0 keys" question!
yes that is why i do it, any request for a new video just tell me
How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
-r 1:10 is too small, i need to check the code but i remeber that the limit is something like 65K keys there are some internal limits for the number of operations, the minimal number of keys is 1024 but the code doesn't limit it, i need to chage it to show a warning in screen.
Ok I am following on the range being too small. I will try with a larger range and see if keyhunt works correctly. It would be helpful to know exactly what the minimum range limit is. So since I did not get the results I expected I held off on doing additional tests. A warning in the console would definitely be helpful if you use a range that is too small. Thanks for the quick response too.
Albert, I think your videos will help people understand, especially the "0 keys" question!
yes that is why i do it, any request for a new video just tell me
How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
-r 1:10 is too small, i need to check the code but i remeber that the limit is something like 65K keys there are some internal limits for the number of operations, the minimal number of keys is 1024 but the code doesn't limit it, i need to chage it to show a warning in screen.
How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?
Test:
./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10
Seems tha the calculation is correct. That is why that puzzle is not solved yet. We all try it by our selfs just hopping for luck.
By the way i made some videos about keyhunt:
keyhunt - Why the program show 0 keys/s?
Keyhunt Solving the 63 bit puzzle, just testing
Regards!
Did you observer any increase in memory usage with a new version?
I have a question about the operating mode -M matrix screen
It increases the chances of winning in random mode?
It increases the chances of winning in random mode?
That options just a test, is to show the full output line by line.
And no it doen't increment anything in chances.
I add that option -M just because some users need to see the program "working" if they don't see lines running out the screen it they think that the program is stuck or freeze.
I do not understand why the creation Bloom filter, became very slow almost 10 times slower.
I used the -S key and -M.
as I understand the key -S Bloom filter is created on disk/ from here creation Bloom filter the speed drops
The previous version of the program directly created bloom in RAM
And now it’s impossible?
I used the -S key and -M.
as I understand the key -S Bloom filter is created on disk/ from here creation Bloom filter the speed drops
The previous version of the program directly created bloom in RAM
And now it’s impossible?
Yes that is a bug, i already correct it, i will update the github repository today.
small calculation of how much RAM is needed to solve 120 puzzles
-n 0x100000000000000000000000000000 -k 1
Bloom filter for 288230376151711744 elements = 1.21755226 exabytes ram
if
Bloom filter for 13967032320 elements = 59.5GB
if I didn't mess anything up
-n 0x100000000000000000000000000000 -k 1
Bloom filter for 288230376151711744 elements = 1.21755226 exabytes ram
if
Bloom filter for 13967032320 elements = 59.5GB
if I didn't mess anything up
Seems tha the calculation is correct. That is why that puzzle is not solved yet. We all try it by our selfs just hopping for luck.
By the way i made some videos about keyhunt:
keyhunt - Why the program show 0 keys/s?
Keyhunt Solving the 63 bit puzzle, just testing
Regards!
small calculation of how much RAM is needed to solve 120 puzzles
-n 0x100000000000000000000000000000 -k 1
Bloom filter for 288230376151711744 elements = 1.21755226 exabytes ram
if
Bloom filter for 13967032320 elements = 59.5GB
if I didn't mess anything up
-n 0x100000000000000000000000000000 -k 1
Bloom filter for 288230376151711744 elements = 1.21755226 exabytes ram
if
Bloom filter for 13967032320 elements = 59.5GB
if I didn't mess anything up
I have a question about the operating mode -M matrix screen
It increases the chances of winning in random mode?
this seems to be a bug because I can't see the speed counter in -M mode
constantly jumps to the next line
I do not understand why the creation Bloom filter, became very slow almost 10 times slower.
I used the -S key and -M.
as I understand the key -S Bloom filter is created on disk/ from here creation Bloom filter the speed drops
The previous version of the program directly created bloom in RAM
And now it’s impossible?
It increases the chances of winning in random mode?
this seems to be a bug because I can't see the speed counter in -M mode
constantly jumps to the next line
Quote
./keyhunt -m rmd160 -f tests/64.rmd -l compress -s 10 -b 64 -R -t 24 -M
Quote
Base key: b446a02fd6f5381f
Base key: cae8a89843ee4ee8
Base key: 82fc18d395467fd4
Base key: cae8a89843ee4ee8
Base key: 82fc18d395467fd4
I do not understand why the creation Bloom filter, became very slow almost 10 times slower.
I used the -S key and -M.
as I understand the key -S Bloom filter is created on disk/ from here creation Bloom filter the speed drops
The previous version of the program directly created bloom in RAM
And now it’s impossible?
For 32gb ddr3 k = 
maybe -k 2048, you need to test.
can you please tell what is the optimal value of n and K for 256GB RAM?
I don't know maybe you need to test with -n 0x400000000000000 and some values some values of K upto fill all the memory. The program tell you more of less how much mamoery is going to need, so test one value and press ctrl C if you that it doesn't fill your RAM
Hi albert0bsd,
have any progress about the program?
have any progress about the program?
Sorry there is no progress yet.
Thanks for the updated Beta version. It looks amazing.
can you please tell what is the optimal value of n and K for 256GB RAM?
thanks.
For 32gb ddr3 k =
would keyhunt be used for ethereum publickey?
I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key.I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
so keyhunt can be used for ethereum,only if i have publickey.
Who is sb and how did they steal your eth?
would keyhunt be used for ethereum publickey?
I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key.I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
so keyhunt can be used for ethereum,only if i have publickey.
Who is sb and how did they steal your eth?
would keyhunt be used for ethereum publickey?
I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key.I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
so keyhunt can be used for ethereum,only if i have publickey.
would keyhunt be used for ethereum publickey?
I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key. I lost my 12.7 eth,and want get them back.
here is the eth address:0xa42181ac82065d34095a3590c90cc56ac390ab5b
Jump to: