I dare to predict that puzzle 66 is at ~72% of its range. 
Ok I'll try that. I to think it's somewhere around there
Hey if you find something don't forget about me
1DvdiYvRr7pzHsYRJiXYdroQNZUqKxLAzf
I now got 67 Pkeys/s hunting Puzzle 130 and 40 Mkeys/s on Puzzle 66Ok I'll try that. I to think it's somewhere around there
Hey if you find something don't forget about me
1DvdiYvRr7pzHsYRJiXYdroQNZUqKxLAzf
I need a new computer to get 1 or 2 Ekeys/s like this guy,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62268526
With bsgs mode it is only a matter of ram to reach those speeds, I don't see it as easy with puzzle 66.
Anyway, I don't think those who solved 120 and 125 have done a full range scan or used a single computer, it would be interesting to know what program and what values they used, but obviously this must be confidential information.
Unfortunately I have the problem that I like numbers and I understand magnitudes, and honestly every time I see the infinity that we face I want to look for my weapon!! ha ha
Personally I believe that whoever made the puzzles did not use a random method, I think the location of the known puzzles in relation to their rank demonstrates this. A while ago I did a linear regression study and I was surprised by the result. I expected the average difference between the predicted and actual location to be approximately 50%, which is what is expected for a linear regression prediction on random data, however the average is 27.81%
I dare to predict that puzzle 66 is at ~72% of its range.
💩💩💩
Bullshit!
The author already said that it was the result of a random keys padding with bits to match the expected range.
Hello Alberto.
However, is the author willing to provide more information? I don't think so, otherwise I would have exposed more public keys. What it has done is increase the incentive so that more people hit the security.
After all, what does the author want to prove? I imagine that the security of bitcoin...
