Kim Dotcom Predict 2000$ per Bitcoin ??!! - page 9.

Daniel91

legendary

Activity: 3374

Merit: 1824

Quote from: Betwrong on August 07, 2016, 04:41:44 AM

Quote from: Snorek on August 05, 2016, 04:51:03 AM

Of cores it is wise to not trust him completely, but I think he got a really strong cards in his hand. And his predictions/expectations are not totally groundless.
$2000 might be a little too much, but 1000 after release of Bitcache is pretty much possible scenario. And I totally agree: BUY NOW while bitcoin is cheap!

IMO the price below $600 is very low for Bitcoin and all the people who bought for this price will profit big time. If a man with 500k followers on twitter is saying Bitcoin will be $2000 at least it means something, right?

I also agree with this prediction but don't think it will happen soon.
Before this scenario happen, Bitcoin should become more popular, online standard for payments, more popular among merchants and customers and becomes mainstream.
I don't think it will happen overnight, i short time but in 3-5 years it's possible.
I think that BTC users, which show faith and patience now, and don't sell their BTC funds for fast profit, will earn much more later.

20kevin20

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1597

Quote from: Betwrong on August 07, 2016, 04:41:44 AM

Quote from: Snorek on August 05, 2016, 04:51:03 AM

Of cores it is wise to not trust him completely, but I think he got a really strong cards in his hand. And his predictions/expectations are not totally groundless.
$2000 might be a little too much, but 1000 after release of Bitcache is pretty much possible scenario. And I totally agree: BUY NOW while bitcoin is cheap!

IMO the price below $600 is very low for Bitcoin and all the people who bought for this price will profit big time. If a man with 500k followers on twitter is saying Bitcoin will be $2000 at least it means something, right?

It's still all a speculation. Nobody can predict it, unless they have the right info (like the magnates can predict Gold price, because they are those controlling it). $2k price would be awesome, and he probably said that because halving rose the BTC price very fast to $1k, it was basically skyrocketing. Now the same thing is going on, probably.

Betwrong

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 2112

I stand with Ukraine.

Quote from: Snorek on August 05, 2016, 04:51:03 AM

Of cores it is wise to not trust him completely, but I think he got a really strong cards in his hand. And his predictions/expectations are not totally groundless.
$2000 might be a little too much, but 1000 after release of Bitcache is pretty much possible scenario. And I totally agree: BUY NOW while bitcoin is cheap!

IMO the price below $600 is very low for Bitcoin and all the people who bought for this price will profit big time. If a man with 500k followers on twitter is saying Bitcoin will be $2000 at least it means something, right?

sempak

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 505

If this is true then this will be great news. bitcoin influence in world financial markets will be taken into account. but for me USD 2000 will not be there in the near future. maybe the next few months could break the bitcoin prices above $ 1,000.

ekaterina77

sr. member

Activity: 255

Merit: 250

Quote from: ethereumhunter on August 05, 2016, 03:49:52 AM

it could be happen while there is a long journey while it reach in $2000. maybe what Kim predict will be right in future, better watch on the market for real and buy when you want to buy while its down rate for now.

If there is a confidence that in the future will get a good profit, which means that the stakes are very high, then it is really possible to buy when the price is low. But who will give 100% confidence in this venture?

OmegaStarScream

staff

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6152

Quote from: gentlemand on August 06, 2016, 11:04:33 AM

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on August 06, 2016, 11:02:10 AM

I wouldn't judge him based on his previous actions personally.

Really? In my experience people don't change. I suppose what has changed for him is that he's amassed a fortune, off the back of raping copyright holders, so no longer needs to defraud people directly.

I assume he'd still be contentedly doing that if he hadn't hit the jackpot.

I wouldn't hold him the responsibility unless he uploads the files himself. I mean how could the uploader get away while the owner gets issues ?
It's pretty much like everything else in the world. If we take the Internet, for example , It could be used for both good and bad (for both selling drugs and for helping billions of users every day).

I'm not supporting him honestly but I'm just using common sense and logic + the way how the government got info about him/his servers was never told to the public which makes everyone think that they violated the man privacy.

plpbtc1526

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Hmmm. Thats the thing i hope to be happen. But im not sure this could happen in a few months but i hope it will. Is it just marketing strategy to increase the demand of bitcoin? Thats too good to be true.

2dogs

legendary

Activity: 1267

Merit: 1000

Quote from: KonceptCars on August 07, 2016, 12:53:09 AM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 06, 2016, 05:55:30 PM

Quote from: gentlemand on August 06, 2016, 11:04:33 AM

he's amassed a fortune, off the back of raping copyright holders, so no longer needs to defraud people directly.

What fraud? What agreement did Dotcom enter into with the so-called "holders" of the copyright? In what way did he renege this (non-existent) agreement, or deceive the copy-masters (lol) into giving him money? He stole nothing and deceived no-one, so there is no fraud.

Can you explain also, why it is that you cast the situation as Dotcom "raping" copyright holders? Copyright holders became a multi-billionaire privileged class in the 20th century, it's not at all unreasonable to express this the other way around: that Dotcom was giving back to the class that was victimised by the entertainment industry by charging the highest price the market could possibly take. New CD albums used to be upto $20, now they're barely $10. And when it's mostly millionaire popstars and record company executives that feel the brunt of that, I'm kind of siding with the hundreds of millions of music/film fans, not the super wealthy moguls and artists. It's not about being "statist" or not, it's about knowing right from wrong.

That is an interesting counter perspective on Megaupload, Napster, and other early P2P sites. In essence, they somewhat set the precedence for bitcoin and the blockchain.

Yes, I've heard it described as Kim DotCom (or Pirate Bay,etc) only provided the medium for the file transfers.
If so, then why should they be held responsible/liable for the contents in those files?
As an analogy, that would be like the Post Office being liable for all the contents in the mail they handle.

goinmerry

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1083

Tsss.. there are lots of people who are predicting it. So give me some reason why that is special and we should believe in it?

KonceptCars

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: Carlton Banks on August 06, 2016, 05:55:30 PM

Quote from: gentlemand on August 06, 2016, 11:04:33 AM

he's amassed a fortune, off the back of raping copyright holders, so no longer needs to defraud people directly.

What fraud? What agreement did Dotcom enter into with the so-called "holders" of the copyright? In what way did he renege this (non-existent) agreement, or deceive the copy-masters (lol) into giving him money? He stole nothing and deceived no-one, so there is no fraud.

Can you explain also, why it is that you cast the situation as Dotcom "raping" copyright holders? Copyright holders became a multi-billionaire privileged class in the 20th century, it's not at all unreasonable to express this the other way around: that Dotcom was giving back to the class that was victimised by the entertainment industry by charging the highest price the market could possibly take. New CD albums used to be upto $20, now they're barely $10. And when it's mostly millionaire popstars and record company executives that feel the brunt of that, I'm kind of siding with the hundreds of millions of music/film fans, not the super wealthy moguls and artists. It's not about being "statist" or not, it's about knowing right from wrong.

That is an interesting counter perspective on Megaupload, Napster, and other early P2P sites. In essence, they somewhat set the precedence for bitcoin and the blockchain.

asriloni

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1024

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on August 05, 2016, 03:41:44 AM

A bunch of tweets he made in the last few hours :

After seeing the image and appearing one questions about this, and does the bitcoin price is not reached like Kim prediction. is it possible to Kim will getting depressed about their prediction? but this is like a miracle the price of bitcoin can touch more than $2000 for each.

Indrawan77

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 516

I am really hoping that it will come true but the possibility of bitcoin reachinf that price is very small, and i personally thinks that it is impossible, the highest point of bitcoin is only 700$, the reason it reach that point is because the halving rumour, unless there is a big breakthrough i am pessimistic that the price is going to reach 2000$

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3071

Quote from: gentlemand on August 06, 2016, 11:04:33 AM

he's amassed a fortune, off the back of raping copyright holders, so no longer needs to defraud people directly.

What fraud? What agreement did Dotcom enter into with the so-called "holders" of the copyright? In what way did he renege this (non-existent) agreement, or deceive the copy-masters (lol) into giving him money? He stole nothing and deceived no-one, so there is no fraud.

Can you explain also, why it is that you cast the situation as Dotcom "raping" copyright holders? Copyright holders became a multi-billionaire privileged class in the 20th century, it's not at all unreasonable to express this the other way around: that Dotcom was giving back to the class that was victimised by the entertainment industry by charging the highest price the market could possibly take. New CD albums used to be upto $20, now they're barely $10. And when it's mostly millionaire popstars and record company executives that feel the brunt of that, I'm kind of siding with the hundreds of millions of music/film fans, not the super wealthy moguls and artists. It's not about being "statist" or not, it's about knowing right from wrong.

angaper

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 507

Quote from: peta4e on August 06, 2016, 03:13:02 PM

Quote from: calkob on August 06, 2016, 02:56:47 PM

i think $2000 will be small change in the future when it is worth an absolute fortune....... Grin

No one can predict the exact price of bitcoin but still it has an potential to go even beyond that and it will totally depend on mass adoption and acceptance of bitcoin worldwide.

I am not so optimistic in this prediction because the multiple conditions required to achieve that level of price are almost impossible to meet in the short or medium run. I prefer other more conservative predictions that fix the maximum potential price around $1300.

peta4e

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: calkob on August 06, 2016, 02:56:47 PM

i think $2000 will be small change in the future when it is worth an absolute fortune....... Grin

No one can predict the exact price of bitcoin but still it has an potential to go even beyond that and it will totally depend on mass adoption and acceptance of bitcoin worldwide.

calkob

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 520

i think $2000 will be small change in the future when it is worth an absolute fortune....... Grin

vero

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: OmegaStarScream on August 05, 2016, 03:41:44 AM

A bunch of tweets he made in the last few hours :

I'm not sure I belonged kim possible that only work for people who try to give the issues of price rise. Here we must try to think realistically about something that never could happen in bitcoin. $ 2000 per bitcoin it's really disgusting dream.

DebitMe

legendary

Activity: 2786

Merit: 1011

Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive

$2,000 per coin is very optimistic IMO. But it is nice to see innovators like DotCom building services around bitcoin that will provide more and more uses for it. That is what we need to get to that 2k point per coin. I just think he is hyping up his release a little bit to gain some support and fans.

Cryptonitex

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Intelesting tweets

$2,000 + is really a dream come true.

coinoclock

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

thats sounds like a wild dream but maybe why not. btu first i want to see his service work properly and i hope its not a scam.

Topic: Kim Dotcom Predict 2000$ per Bitcoin ??!! - page 9. (Read 9948 times)