STOP WITH SECTION 75. YOU ARE NOT COVERED.
Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
KNCMINER binds you as a BUSINESS, NOT a consumer.
It doesn't work that way.
The seller does not define who the buyer is. If you are a non-professional, a consumer, buying an item for personal use, you are covered as such. If you buy as a registered business, ie. "KS coins Inc", you are not.
But KnC's terms & conditions force you to state you are not a consumer but are rather a business. What does that do to the law? (I really don't know so I'm asking, not trolling.)
I was very pro-KnC in the beginning but I am becoming less so as the days go forward. What they did yesterday was a new low.
1) It appears that the Mars would cost more to produce than they were asking for it AND/OR the FGPA lead time was longer than the expected life of the product. This should have been apparent to ORSoC from the beginning. Project planning FAIL.
2) At the very least, they should allow customers to put $2800 "down" towards a Jupiter for each Mars that was ordered then pay the full amount when a working Jupiter is demonstrated. This is nearly what what was promised from the start minus Mars hardware delivered. (I'm looking at the risk to buyers perspective.)
3) The whole "lottery" thing of forcing people to pay full amount up front BEFORE the demo day is ...umm... BAD to out it politely.
KnC's only plus is that the FPGA hardware does indeed look real. I'm am looking forward to the reports from the open house visitors.
Before KnC gets any of my money (BTC or fiat), they need to restore some of their reputation by making it more clear how they will deliver working 28nm ASICs by September.