I didn't know that there are classifications of it and described as how OP did it. To be honest, I don't think people that are taking risk didn't know that they are taking risks. They know for a fact that they do it and they don't mind taking it. In layman's term, it's a gamble of whatever you're taking. Whatever classification you have mentioned and if someone is taking a risk on it, the easiest logic to understand it without being confused is you are taking a gamble.
Well, I wasn't aware of this risk classification either, and I partly agree with this explanation. I think that risk is a risk. Financial, strategic, operational... one problem always leads to the other, so for me, it's all the same. One risky move (you can take a risk type from OP) can
be beneficial or can lead to losing a lot, it's like that whenever we decide to take some risk.
Instead of classifying risk, I would also focus on assessing the risk itself and what that risk can bring or take away. We can give any kind of
name to a risk we take, but it's still just a risk that has chances to give us what we want or take us down, so why to complicate it?